Quote:
Originally Posted by sglancy12
Tell us more Dog 6..
Is it a post Apartheid state or a South Africa that still practices Apartheid? How widespread are South Africa's forces? Are they agents of stability or are they just fighting it out with the local Soviet proxies?
Anyone else have a preference here? A barely functioning post Apartheid South Africa, probably lead by Nelson Mandela... the one guy the blacks would support and who wouldn't indulge in bloody revenge on the whites... This state would be besieged by armies of refugees and marauders pouring into the relative stability of South Africa, overrunning farms and looting communities.
...or a besieged apartheid South Africa, probably led by F.W. de Klerk, or a more reactionary Afrikaner President elected during the 1994 presidential race. This state would be besieged from within and without, fighting a very ugly race war. This war would turn much of South Africa into a war zone, and it would therefore be less attractive to refugees seeking safety. But perhaps foreign marauders would enter the country claiming to be there to liberate the place from "White Colonialism," only to loot and pillage any ethnic group that has something they want. This "race-war" South Africa is going to be a place of bloody absolutes and total war against civilians and soldiers.
Which one would make for a more likely scenario?
And which one would make for a more interesting role-playing environment for your players?
A. Scott Glancy, President TCCorp, dba Pagan Publishing
|
I have no Apartheid in South Africa, they are the main suppler of DU tank ammo in 2001. They have divisions all over from cape town to central Africa along with a US army group. They even took part in operations in the med and the war with france. "armies of refugees" LOL a few 20kt bombs fixed that problem.
BTW we play Battalions and up, mostly division's.