View Single Post
  #26  
Old 03-10-2010, 08:15 PM
kota1342000's Avatar
kota1342000 kota1342000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
I like the work you've done. I'm especially appreciative that you've maintained the spirit of Twilight: 2000 in your organization. I note that the 91st ID hasn't come across any hidden stockpiles of tanks and TOW missiles. The battalions are quite small. This is a weak division, but it's exactly the sort of combat formation one would expect in late 2000/early 2001. Nicely done!

Webstral
Weak by the standards we normally assign to formations, but by 2000/2001 the reformed 91st would be a preetty powerful formation...except for the level of training of the majority of the troops. The adventure is built around forming up and testing the unit against Soviet, Mexican and marauder elements in Southern California.
With a little research, I figured it would make more sense for this kind of formation to pull the 106mm rcls back out as the ammunition would be easier to manufacture and the system has many less quirks. Its the mortar equivalent for the anti-tank side and can be used for bunker busting too.
Thanks btw
Reply With Quote