![]() |
![]() |
|
View Poll Results: What is your favorite battle rifle for your PC | |||
L1A1/FAL |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 29.29% |
M-14/M1A |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 32.32% |
G-3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 25.25% |
AR-10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 6.06% |
M-1 Garand |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 8.08% |
other (list below) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 6.06% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wish I had a Garand...
![]() I picked the G-3. I've never fired any of the guns on the list but I chose it because it looks shorter and handier than the FN FAL (and, as opposed to the SLR version, is full auto capable) and it has a pistol grip. Some of the tricked out versions used by German and Norwegian commandos look pretty flippin' sweet too.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As a point of interest, the L1A1 SLR can be easily converted to fire automatically by several methods. Two that I know of involve a match stick inserted inside or simply removing the safety catch. Of course it's not exactly a great idea as the barrel is a bit light to cope and you loose the ability for single shots (not to mention a working safety!)
A third option is judicious application of a file to the safety which both removes the exterior "lug" from the safety which prevents it rotating around to the Auto setting (the L1A1 is marked with an auto setting even though it's not actually able to fire that way), and a little work on the same peice internally.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AR-10, as it is very familiar to the M16 which the USMC sought to train me on. And I own one. Very nice weapon.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
War is the absence of reason. But then, life often demands unreasonable responses. - Lucian Soulban, Warhammer 40000 series, Necromunda Book 6, Fleshworks Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In other parts of the world, absolutely. I doubt they would here in Australia though. I can't imagine the Australian military thinking it would be a good idea to provide militias with full-auto converted SLRs. I think they would feel much more comfortable training militias to use SLRs in the same way that the Australian Army has always used them (semi auto).
__________________
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The lighter barrel the L1A1 is equipped with probably wouldn't stand up to automatic fire for all that long. At a guess, maybe it would last through one decent contact before becoming effectively useless.
However, replacing the barrel with a heavier one while retaining the other parts is conceivable - but it would require at least a trained armourer and the correct tools. Without a bipod though I can't really see the point. You'd also need to find a decent supply of the larger (and seriously rare) 30 round mags - the standard 20s are gone in a flash (same with the 30 true be told). As a side note, the Infantry museum at Singleton, NSW has an L1A1 and an M16 converted to bullpup. Both weapons are capable of fire even though the "conversion" appears to be little more than application of a hacksaw, and adding a bit of fencing wire and assorted bits and peices that happened to be laying about the workshop....
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem Last edited by Legbreaker; 02-04-2010 at 03:43 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks to StainlessSteelCynic this is one of the weapons I remember seeing at Singleton. http://www.nvtech.com.au/index-pastProjects.html
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
War is the absence of reason. But then, life often demands unreasonable responses. - Lucian Soulban, Warhammer 40000 series, Necromunda Book 6, Fleshworks Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Or AG-3 as we call it -AutomatGevær-3 .
It is a sturdy,accurate and reliable piece of gun .Heavyer than carbines,only 20 round mag etc etc . But still - us Norgies have had it since the late 60s and used from the Polar Circle to the Bekaa Valley. We now use the HK 416 which is like an M4 with a piston system - only better than an M4 - ![]() I havent quite decided yet which one I favour -but the AG-3 is definently a good battle rifle. I see many have the SLR as primo arma. I cant argue with that choice either -proven and re-proven . I think many tend to choose whatever they are most familiar with though.Stick with what you know in a way . As for use in game terms , the battle rifle is very useful if you have good STR and AG .If not , the recoil builds up to fast for efficient use imho. Still in game terms - if you get them with the 7,62x51 you get them good. The 5.56 you might get them straight off - but maybe not . |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Privyet!
I have to go with the SVT-40, "Stalin's Garand." 7.62x54, 10 round box mag...and it looks as sharp as hell. The only accessories are a scope, a bayonet, and a sling. ![]() Me with mine at a public "demo" (ie, dog and pony show) in Waxahatchie, TX: ![]() Call me old-fashioned. ![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SVT-40 a true Frontovik!
Another good battle rifle always wanted one for my collection seems like every time I almost aquire one something gets in the way. I have almost bought about 4 of these rifles. Not to mention the cut down Carbine version of these rifles is extremely appealing actaully had a twilight game set in russia and one of the players aquired a SVT-40 PU from a great Patriotic war diarama in a musuem. It was later used with deadly effect. Gotta Love 7.62x54R leave it to russia to develope a round nearly the same ballisticaly to 7.62x51 only 80 years before we did! There is reason that this round is being used today even though it was invented in the 1880' Love the SVT though they are sadly harder to get these days. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very Wierd Poll..Most here have not been to combat or have carried all these weapons in or to Combat. So we are going off what we have read or heard ...This is not good. I have attended Foreign Weapons Instructors course and Have handled all the above weapons in Static Live fire and In BE's. I had a preferance for the G3 with the FAL a close second. I own a M-1 and a M-14 and shoot them often. If I was in Combat where I had to have a Battle rifle I would choose the FAL..Its not better then the G3 but there are more out there to use and I would feel I would be well armed with a reliable weapon that had the power to stop any two or four legged creatures.....
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The arguement on the 5.56...go stand in the street and let me shot you in the chest and then I will ask you if it is a under-strenght round...ok thats right you would not be able to talk you would be dead.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The poll is titled What is your favorite battle rifle for your PC? It's for the game, not real life
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in order.
G3 (ootb can serve any decent sniper) M14 (the 8 round ding with a box mag) FAL (democracies right arm) M1 garand (the 8 round ding.)
__________________
the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have shot the M-14 while in the service...an absolute sweetheart of a weapon, very easy to use, ergonomic and surisingly far more accurate than a M-16 on single shot. When kicked over to full auto, he had better have been hitting the barbells at the gem, the recoil would throw you all over the range.
Since getting out, I have purchased an M-1 Garand...and next to my wife and kids, this is the love of my life (at least until the military starts selling off M-14s to civilians). A sweet, sweet rifle.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you can find an older M1A (back when Springfield Armory was basically just assembling USGI M14 parts on their receivers), or get one from a higher end manufacturer than SA today, you can get something that is about as close to the real thing as will ever be available on the commercial market, though. (Well, I'm told there are some transferable Class III M14s out there, but I think I've heard upwards of $15K price tags if you can even find one . . .) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hmmm went through Basic with the 14 went through AIT as well.
Then go to Nam and get a 16......... er wtf? buy browning auto five and get permission to carry. Happy again. My SWAT team started out with a L1A1 as heavy support weapon carried by the 6'5" 245 lbs middle linebacker of our team. Me ... shortened mini 14 and restocked as I was the happy Scout. I do love that garand action ( have one) and have the 30 carbine and m1a1 scoped as well. It is a very good and dependable design as seen by the use as a sniper weapon now. I will say I think you members of HER Britanic forces are just biased ![]() PS I can not spell and am taking pain meds so there.
__________________
Tis better to do than to do not. Tis better to act than react. Tis better to have a battery of 105's than not. Tis better to see them afor they see you. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Tags |
polls, weapons |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|