|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
One of the other issues is that recon will generally be scouting with one or two vehicles up close. And literally everytime a military has tried to do that with heavy armour it's failed.
Tanks be they M1s or Panthers have poor visibility (well except maybe the very latest generation of all around cameras). Are limited in their agility and by their weight where they can go. The same pretty much applies to the heavy APCs they may be considering. So giving the Recon team a heavy vehicle on it's own would more than likely be a deathtrap if swarmed by an enemy armed with little more than petrol or the ability to knock over buildings. So something like a Peacekeeper or even an unarmoured Humvee would enable a team to drive away fast over most surfaces and with plain old windows that everyone can look out of, would have far superior situational awareness. Recon is traditionally one of the most dangerous missions for any military unit, the future maybe more so. If the project is considering a heavy APC for MARS etc. A popular solution is to get an obsolete tank; rip the turret out and ammo storage and put some seats in there. Voila instant heavy APC. In fact with the weight saved from losing the turret you can give it better all around armour then it would have had as a tank. Ok so you've got an APC that weighs 40 tonnes+ with all the inherent problems but it'll do the job without getting wiped out like a lighter dedicated APC. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I hate to seem like I'm stating the obvious, but equipment choice depends on a number of things: mission, opposition, terrain, available personnel, and so on.
For example. My own version of the Atlantis Project doesn't have "Recon Teams". It has "Network Teams" which are tasked with initial contact, survey and assessment (which usually involves interaction with survivor communities). These teams also have a responsibility to 'connect' these communities with the Atlantis Project - and other survivors. Opposition is expected to be very lightly armed. Terrain would be mostly "on-road" and teams would be about 6 people (who have to transport light weaponry and LOTS of communications gear). Tanks would not be appropriate - but something like an armoured Unimog would be useful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyssen_Henschel_UR-416 (check out the "home-made" PLO version) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_Dingo Last edited by Matt W; 04-04-2017 at 07:28 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Especially if they have advanced weapons like ATGMs to further even the odds. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://aw.my.com/gb/news/general/he...urion-variants well no everyone from the Indian army to the Ukraneans do it, Israel more than most has made an art of repurposing old tanks. As it is buying a bunch of outdated hardware and messing around with it, is not that suspicious but building brand new multi million dollar APCs is. As for recon I think they were always viewed as a disposable asset. If they don't respond on radio checks send another recon team, if that fails send a MARS team. Sensible Recon teams would have worked to observe from a distance and then send foot patrols in probably in mufti. I'm not sure this uparmoured and heavily armed vision of Recon was what the project would have been looking for. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Project can't just recruit or draft a replacement, losing a single team is a problem, losing 2 in one area means you don't have Recon teams in that area of a few thousand square miles any more. The fact that you are going to lose Recon teams to enemy action doesn't mean that you consider them disposable. Quote:
Quote:
R-001: Recon Team with V-150 w/ 20mm cannon R-002: Recon Team with Commando Scout w/20mm cannon and XR-311 R-003: Recon Team with V-150 w/M2HB R-004: Recon Team with Commando Ranger w/M2HB R-005: Recon Team with V-150 x/ 81mm mortar R-007: Recon Team with V-150 w/ TOW and FAVs R-010: 3 Recon Teams with (1) Commando Ranger w/M2HB, (2) Commando Scout w/20mm cannon and XR-311, and (3) V-150 w/ 20mm cannon Out of 9 Recon teams, 5 V-150's, 2 Commando Scouts, and 2 Commando Rangers. Recon teams were never envisioned as being lightly armored or armed unless you look at some optional takes on a couple of modules. And I think that is a reasonable starting point, I see no reason to say that Recon teams should be in uparmored pickups. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Currently, it is the Ukranians doing this with T-55s making the BMP-55 or the Israelis using T-55s to make the Acharzit or purpose built chassis to make the Namer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yup I was reading up on it, once you take the old diesel powerpack out of a Centurion or a T55 you've saved enough room in the back for a door way out of the rear. And once you've yanked the turret you've saved enough weight to put heavy armour all the way around. In fact IDF Merkavas have been knocked out by heavy Kornet ATGMS, whilst Nammer APCs have taken similar hits and kept on trucking. The cost of a couple million dollars on these HAPCs usually comes down to ROWs, reactive armour, extra cameras and communication systems. But if you just want a basic APC like the WW2 Kangaroo the whole thing could be done for a fraction of that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The kangaroos were about repurposing old gear at a lower relative standard of performance, I think you could do a much better job by other means, especially if you don't already have the tanks and a desire to save money. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I think in some of the official stuff that came out in magazines afterwards there was description of the rather sinister replacements. Basically a team of similarly skilled MORROW members with a basic equipment load. Who when the first team were reduced in number or wiped out could replace them.
Most military or paramilitary organisations work on the basis that not everyones going to make it. And when you're job is going out and looking what's going on in a world of desperate lawlesness then more so. And the generically skilled team in a small armoured vehicle are way more disposable than the specialised disaster recovery team or medical unit. nb the Commando is pushing the definition of a heavy armour vehicle. Developed in the Vietnam War as a quick and cheap way of providing armoured support for military police escorting convoys or guarding air bases. It's basically an armoured school bus with the same engine and drive system. Which left it lightly armoured and not really capable of taking on much more than it came with. Not to mention a 4 wheeled military vehicle is always going to be at risk of being crippled by having one of them blown off. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There is a thread for them here ---> Frozen Watch |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If your men are disposable, you're the bad guy. Even if there are ONLY bad guys, you're still one of them, there is no one you can stand next to that makes you a good guy. There are huge sections of history and fiction that illustrate this. Quote:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|