|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I hate to seem like I'm stating the obvious, but equipment choice depends on a number of things: mission, opposition, terrain, available personnel, and so on.
For example. My own version of the Atlantis Project doesn't have "Recon Teams". It has "Network Teams" which are tasked with initial contact, survey and assessment (which usually involves interaction with survivor communities). These teams also have a responsibility to 'connect' these communities with the Atlantis Project - and other survivors. Opposition is expected to be very lightly armed. Terrain would be mostly "on-road" and teams would be about 6 people (who have to transport light weaponry and LOTS of communications gear). Tanks would not be appropriate - but something like an armoured Unimog would be useful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyssen_Henschel_UR-416 (check out the "home-made" PLO version) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_Dingo Last edited by Matt W; 04-04-2017 at 07:28 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Especially if they have advanced weapons like ATGMs to further even the odds. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://aw.my.com/gb/news/general/he...urion-variants well no everyone from the Indian army to the Ukraneans do it, Israel more than most has made an art of repurposing old tanks. As it is buying a bunch of outdated hardware and messing around with it, is not that suspicious but building brand new multi million dollar APCs is. As for recon I think they were always viewed as a disposable asset. If they don't respond on radio checks send another recon team, if that fails send a MARS team. Sensible Recon teams would have worked to observe from a distance and then send foot patrols in probably in mufti. I'm not sure this uparmoured and heavily armed vision of Recon was what the project would have been looking for. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Project can't just recruit or draft a replacement, losing a single team is a problem, losing 2 in one area means you don't have Recon teams in that area of a few thousand square miles any more. The fact that you are going to lose Recon teams to enemy action doesn't mean that you consider them disposable. Quote:
Quote:
R-001: Recon Team with V-150 w/ 20mm cannon R-002: Recon Team with Commando Scout w/20mm cannon and XR-311 R-003: Recon Team with V-150 w/M2HB R-004: Recon Team with Commando Ranger w/M2HB R-005: Recon Team with V-150 x/ 81mm mortar R-007: Recon Team with V-150 w/ TOW and FAVs R-010: 3 Recon Teams with (1) Commando Ranger w/M2HB, (2) Commando Scout w/20mm cannon and XR-311, and (3) V-150 w/ 20mm cannon Out of 9 Recon teams, 5 V-150's, 2 Commando Scouts, and 2 Commando Rangers. Recon teams were never envisioned as being lightly armored or armed unless you look at some optional takes on a couple of modules. And I think that is a reasonable starting point, I see no reason to say that Recon teams should be in uparmored pickups. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|