RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-26-2010, 07:38 AM
TiggerCCW UK's Avatar
TiggerCCW UK TiggerCCW UK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 663
Default

As far as I remember some of the close obs platoons used M16's over here, and IIRC the M16 was issued to certain units in Newry after an overpenetration incident when a squaddie with an SLR returned fire on a provie gunman and shot straight through the walls of a house and nearly hit a civilian. I'm unsure why this was deemed a particular problem in Newry as opposed to Belfast, Stroke sity or any other urban area.
__________________
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-26-2010, 09:40 AM
Ironside Ironside is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ipswich, UK.
Posts: 113
Default

Thanks for the replies people; I would have responded earlier but RL raised its ugly head.

@StainlessSteelCynic

Small arms did slip my mind, I'll rectify that in the next draft. I left out the 25pdr deliberately as my major source for that - Encyclopedia of the British Army 3rd Edition by Terry Gander 1986 - mentions that the 25pdr would soon be withdrawn due to diminishing ammo supplies, more having to be ordered from India or other country using it. I had no idea that the ammo was being produced in Britain. I'd be very grateful if you could share your info on that.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:58 PM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

The L119A1 is a Diemaco, as far as I can tell, having spent some time on the ranges with some SFSG lads while on tour who let us have a go.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-26-2010, 08:09 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironside View Post
Thanks for the replies people; I would have responded earlier but RL raised its ugly head.

@StainlessSteelCynic

Small arms did slip my mind, I'll rectify that in the next draft. I left out the 25pdr deliberately as my major source for that - Encyclopedia of the British Army 3rd Edition by Terry Gander 1986 - mentions that the 25pdr would soon be withdrawn due to diminishing ammo supplies, more having to be ordered from India or other country using it. I had no idea that the ammo was being produced in Britain. I'd be very grateful if you could share your info on that.
To be a little clearer, I have probably been confused with the fact that Pakistan Ordnance Factories still produce the 25-pounder ammo however my original information was that the Honourable Artillery Company was still operating the gun into the early 1990s. I haven't found my book yet but I have found the same info given in the wiki article on the HAC in the Post-War section
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honoura...illery_Company
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-26-2010, 10:01 PM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
The L119A1 is a Diemaco, as far as I can tell, having spent some time on the ranges with some SFSG lads while on tour who let us have a go.
Perardua,

Diemaco is an interesting story. Both new and licenced weapons (SA-80, AUSTEYR-88) seem to have considerable teething difficulties; Diemaco took a design and within a decade had made improvements on the original so much that more C7s-C8s were sold to more foreign governments than the M16/M4 designs, and in more versions. In a move that is neither surprising nor ironic, Colt acquired Diemaco and it is now known as "Colt Canada".

There were rumours in the 90's that the Diemaco C7 and C8 would replace the L85A1, but for many reasons this didn't come about. For one thing, a lot of time and money had been sunk into the SA-80. Also, the idea might have been to run out the clock until the next generation infantry weapon was developed, likely an OICW-type system.

In the T2K timeline, it's possible that after being adopted by special units in the 90's, the L119A1 would become more widespread in British units due to quality and availability, at least as a stopgap while the L85A2 is developed and deployed.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-26-2010, 10:13 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

I can't say any of the early model F88 Austeyrs I was issued had any teething problems. All worked well without faults.
The only thing I could say about it is that the bolt hold open device (a simple slot for cocking handle) didn't exactly instill a lot of confidence in the user after handling the L1A1. It seemed too easy to accidentally knock it, allowing the bolt to fly forward and chamber a round (or potentially trapping a finger in the chamber while conducing night time safety checks).
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-26-2010, 10:41 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
The only thing I could say about it is that the bolt hold open device (a simple slot for cocking handle) didn't exactly instill a lot of confidence in the user after handling the L1A1. It seemed too easy to accidentally knock it, allowing the bolt to fly forward and chamber a round (or potentially trapping a finger in the chamber while conducing night time safety checks).
The bolt hold-open of the M16 is like that. It's especially apparent when you go from Inspection Arms to Order Arms -- the butt goes to the ground and the bolt immediately goes forward. But it also makes for a quicker reloading time -- just trip the bolt catch after putting in a new magazine.
__________________
War is the absence of reason. But then, life often demands unreasonable responses. - Lucian Soulban, Warhammer 40000 series, Necromunda Book 6, Fleshworks

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-26-2010, 10:59 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Having used both weapons, I have to say the catch on the M16 is definately the flimsier. At least with the F88 you can keep your hand in a position that will block the cocking handle if it does dislodge itself (just don't let any instructors see your hand anywhere near it).

It seems strange that with the L1A1 SOP was that you engaged the hold open device, yet kept your hand on the cocking handle (in case the catch failed), but with the Steyr you got in serious shit for doing exactly the same thing.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-27-2010, 02:18 AM
Rainbow Six's Avatar
Rainbow Six Rainbow Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
To be a little clearer, I have probably been confused with the fact that Pakistan Ordnance Factories still produce the 25-pounder ammo however my original information was that the Honourable Artillery Company was still operating the gun into the early 1990s. I haven't found my book yet but I have found the same info given in the wiki article on the HAC in the Post-War section
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honoura...illery_Company
I can't be 100% certain on this, but I think the HAC's Gun Troop had a mainly ceremonial role.

There's some more info on them here (not all of this would be correct in a T2K timeline).

http://www.arrse.co.uk/wiki/Honourab...illery_Company

Cheers

Dave
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-27-2010, 03:33 AM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

A couple of the NCOs I was talking to on the range were of the opinion that the L119 was no more reliable than an L85A2, but offered the advantages of being able to be fired from the left shoulder, being not obviously British (plenty of people use Diemacos, whilst the L85 is rather distinctively ours), and most important of all, being different from the rest of the forces, which they admitted was part of the draw of being SF.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 10-27-2010, 04:54 AM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
A couple of the NCOs I was talking to on the range were of the opinion that the L119 was no more reliable than an L85A2, but offered the advantages of being able to be fired from the left shoulder, being not obviously British (plenty of people use Diemacos, whilst the L85 is rather distinctively ours), and most important of all, being different from the rest of the forces, which they admitted was part of the draw of being SF.
Peradua,

I could see this, the main advantage of the C8/L119A1 is that it was a proven design that was available immediately as a replacement for the L85A1, not that it was more reliable (once the SA80's kinks were worked out).

Leg,

I'm not going to get into the concerns with the early AUGs, as these mainly exaggerations and the AUSteyr does not belong on a "worst weapons" list. (There were a few changes that did improve things drastically but the design was sound.) Personally, I'd have been fine if Canada chose the AUG over the AR-15, but there it is.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-27-2010, 06:19 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Personally I'd have been happy if they kept the 7.62N L1A1 instead of the 5.56 F88, but that's just me and my desire to see a target obliterated rather than tickled to death....
I do like the ergonomices of the F88 a bit more though as it's much easier to use on handed than just about any other weapon I've every laid my greasy fingers on. Some say it's an uncomfortable weapon to use, but I think that's mainly because it's a bullpup and nothing is where you'd expect it to be on a conventional weapon. Adequate training fixes that. It's also one of the easiest weapons to carry on patrol because of it's centre of balance being right at the pistol grip.
It's only other drawback, at least in the earlier versions, was it's inability to fit a GL or alternate sights and accessories (this wasn't much of an issue at the time though as VERY few accessories were available, let alone issued).
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-27-2010, 07:08 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,345
Default

I've never fired a bullpup weapon, so...how does a bullpup compare to a conventional rifle? And has anyone here used one in combat?
__________________
War is the absence of reason. But then, life often demands unreasonable responses. - Lucian Soulban, Warhammer 40000 series, Necromunda Book 6, Fleshworks

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-27-2010, 07:18 PM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Personally I'd have been happy if they kept the 7.62N L1A1 instead of the 5.56 F88, but that's just me and my desire to see a target obliterated rather than tickled to death....
Leg,

You would have a lot of agreement from members of the Canadian Forces (Reg Force and militia) who transitioned from the 7.62x51mm FN C1A1/C2A1 to the 5.56x45mm C7/C8. There is still a lot of nostalgia for the old "FN".

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-27-2010, 07:33 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Personally I'd have been happy if they kept the 7.62N L1A1 instead of the 5.56 F88, but that's just me and my desire to see a target obliterated rather than tickled to death....
I hear ya.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-27-2010, 07:42 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Fortunatley I avoided combat, but I've trained intensively with the L1A1, M16A1, F88 and M60 (plus a few other less relevant systems). I'd have to say that I like the L1A1 for it's hitting power and solid contruction (now there's a weapon you can really smack somebody about with!), and the M60 is definately my favourite (what's not to like about a belt fed machinegun?), but for general patrolling and assault, the Steyr is the better weapon (note I'm ignoring the M16).

In it's base form (without accessories) it's perfectly balanced as I've already indicated around the pistol grip. It can be fired accurately one handed (although I'd advise tucking the stock into the shoulder anyway) which leaves the off hand to do other tasks such as open doors, carry equipment, etc.

The 30 round mags are ok, certainly better than the 20 rounds of the L1A1, and the weapon of course is capable of automatic fire. It is however not suited to automatic due to it's light weight - still, it's a good option to have for close range "panic" fire.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-27-2010, 11:25 PM
LBraden's Avatar
LBraden LBraden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England
Posts: 150
Default

The L1A1 was a good weapon, one of the downsides of the new L85 is that it has a plastic butt, which is relevant to this:

During one of the numerous riots that happened in Northern Ireland in around 1982 my father was involved in a bit of defending, well... during said riot he got a hurling ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurling ) stick though this plexi-glass riot helmet shield, left him with a good cut above his left eye.
Now, being sensible the army sent him to hospital to get patched up, except someone forgot to remove his ammo, so under SOP, no anaesthetic, which meant my father had 5 stitches with no pain relief.
So when he got discharged some bright spark passed him a new helmet and told him to get back to the fight.
To the day my father died, he was sure he got the bloke back, by swinging the rifle round and picking this bloke off the ground by usage of his groin region, my father is sure of this as 1) The gentlemen was wearing black balaclava, black bomber jacket, cammo trousers and 2) carrying a hurling stick.

Only problem he had, was he broke the wooden butt of the SLR, and hated the new plastic one because you could not "slightly alter" the butt to fit your shoulder properly, with a simple bit of wood carving

But I will say this, if ya want to stop a raging bull, and your marksman just put 10 rounds in its head with his SLR, make sure the Gimpy is loaded.
__________________
Newbie DM/PM/GM
Semi-experienced player

Mostly a sci-fi nut, who plays a few PC games.
I do some technical and vehicle drawings in my native M20 scale. - http://braden1986.deviantart.com/
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-28-2010, 04:57 AM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LBraden View Post
But I will say this, if ya want to stop a raging bull, and your marksman just put 10 rounds in its head with his SLR, make sure the Gimpy is loaded.
Lee,

A friend told me about how he was on a winter exercise in the bush with Cadets and was charged by a starving wolverine. The beast was so low that only the top of the skull was visible above the snow as it humped furiously towards them. The .22LR bullets fired from their rechambered Lee-Enfields only enraged it without penetrating the skull. The soldier/instructor knew to aim lower and was armed with an FN, finally stopping it.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-28-2010, 09:01 AM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
I've never fired a bullpup weapon, so...how does a bullpup compare to a conventional rifle? And has anyone here used one in combat?
I've spent my entire military career (pretty much) armed with a bullpup rifle in the form of the L85A2, apart from some brief range days with Diemaco's, M4s and M16s at various times. I have used the L85 on operations (in my case also fitted with a UGL), and appreciated the compactness of the weapon (especially in vehicle based patrolling, and the limited amount of urban work we did), as well as the fact that, like the Steyr, it's very easy to use one handed while performing other tasks with the left hand.

The inability to fire from the left shoulder has never been a problem in my experience, but then my AO was mostly flat desert anyway. Something that was also brought to my attention is that for a weapon 785mm/30.9 inches long, you get 518mm/20.4 inches of barrel. Compared to the M16A2, which according to Wikipedia is 1010mm/39.625 inches long but with a 508mm/20 inch barrel, the advantages of the bullpup design in reducing overall weapon length without the loss of barrel length are obvious.

I also wonder if the lack of experience with firearms in the majority of the general UK population helped with the adoption of a bullpup design - the majority of people have never used a 'conventional' layout weapon anyway, so recruits joining the armed forces will have their first experience with an L85. I know that when I have later used rifles like the M16 series on exchanges and suchlike I have not grasped the layout as quickly as someone used to a conventionally laid out rifle might.

Unrelated to the bullpup design, but just as a general point, the weapon is unfortunately rather heavy, especially when fitted with a SUSAT (now being replaced by a combined ACOG/reflex sight) and LLM (visible/IR laser/torch thingy), and even more so when you stick a UGL on the end. However, this does mean that the barrel suffers relatively little climb in automatic fire (not that there is ever normally any good reason to be firing bursts of any length), and with the addition of the ops issue vertical foregrip/bipod, makes it very accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-28-2010, 09:02 AM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

Oh, and the L7A2 GPMG is the king of machineguns. But that's not really relevant!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 10-28-2010, 09:43 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
Oh, and the L7A2 GPMG is the king of machineguns. But that's not really relevant!
It is relevant because the truth hurts!!!

The Belgian FN-MAG design, and its clones, the L7A2 and the M-240 have to be the best machineguns, almost as good as a M-2HB....and they will probably soldier on longer than the famous "Ma Deuce"!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-28-2010, 10:43 AM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

It's better than a .50 purely because I can carry and fire it without assistance! Apparently Heckler & Koch is doing an update of the GPMG for the British forces, made from significantly lighter materials and with a picatinny rail on the top cover, or at least so I read in the various trade magazines we have in the crew room.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-28-2010, 11:39 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
It's better than a .50 purely because I can carry and fire it without assistance! Apparently Heckler & Koch is doing an update of the GPMG for the British forces, made from significantly lighter materials and with a picatinny rail on the top cover, or at least so I read in the various trade magazines we have in the crew room.
Granted, the GPMG is can be carried and fired by one man...

But there is still something, special about setting up a Ma Deuce on a tripod, setting the H&T...and loading a 500 round belt until the old bitch! Then firing that belt at on old truck...and then taking a look at just how much damage a .50 AP round does...

It's almost as much fun as watching Tom & Jerry cartoons with my daughter!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-28-2010, 12:22 PM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

We shot up old tank hulks on Lydd ranges with the .50 when we did our training with it. Good times, even if I did slip and burn myself doing a barrel change. GMG's pretty good too, though reassembing the bolt after cleaning is like doing a rubik's cube.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-28-2010, 05:01 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

The FN MAG or whatever you want to call it has one drawback from what I've heard (we only had the M60) was that there was nothing up front to hold onto when the weapon was hot. Made it a little difficult to carry about in an attack.
Great weapon on a mount or stationary position, but try moving and fighting with it and you run into issues.

Now as for destroying things, the .50cal has nothing on a hundred kilos of ANFO....
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-28-2010, 05:35 PM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

Carrying handle, or just wear gloves. The American version has a heat shield anyway, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-28-2010, 05:40 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Yes, I'd heard the carrying handle was the only thing that could be used, however it's not exactly in the best position for that sort of activity.
A heatshield is in my opinion, an absolute MUST. Sure you can wear a glove, but that reduces your manual dexterity and slow reaction time in the event of a stoppage. Any glove thick enough to cope with the blistering heat is unlikely to allow the fine motorskills required to reload, etc.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-28-2010, 06:22 PM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

To be honest, for speed of movement in and especially out of firing positions (which with a GPMG, are going to be prone) whilst on the attack, the carrying handle is actually better than carrying it in a conventional fashion. Grab gun, run to next position, gun down, you go down behind it, then when you get up you just grab it by the handle and leg it forward again. That's how we used it in the light role, and is how it's supposed to be done on the annual weapons assessment for GPMG when advancing and withdrawing. SF role is a different matter.

Seemed to work at the time.

Last edited by perardua; 10-28-2010 at 06:25 PM. Reason: Hit reply too soon
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-28-2010, 07:03 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
It's better than a .50 purely because I can carry and fire it without assistance! Apparently Heckler & Koch is doing an update of the GPMG for the British forces, made from significantly lighter materials and with a picatinny rail on the top cover, or at least so I read in the various trade magazines we have in the crew room.
FN USA has built a version of the M240, which I believe is in limited issue now, which has a good portion of the steel parts replaced by lighter titanium. It's on my pages, and it's a lot lighter than a standard M240.
__________________
War is the absence of reason. But then, life often demands unreasonable responses. - Lucian Soulban, Warhammer 40000 series, Necromunda Book 6, Fleshworks

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-28-2010, 07:15 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Now as for destroying things, the .50cal has nothing on a hundred kilos of ANFO....
Indeed.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.