Player vs. Player Campaign

[Raellus]

Originally Posted by Targan

I've had countless instances of PvP in other games I have run, especially in my last Gunmaster Cyberpunk 2020 campaign but PvP hasn't really been an issue in my Gunmaster T2K campaign. There have been a few minor incidents and certainly PCs have considered acting against each other but since Major Po has been in charge there has been virtually none of that. I think it is due to naked fear of Po.

Yes, I've had quite a bit of intraparty tension in my campaign as well. A little adds some interesting dynamics but I've found that too much drama starts dragging players down. Some players don't seem to realize that, in many ways, T2K is a team game.

Yes, Boogie, that's the sort of thing I was thinking about. Free City of Krakow would make a good PvP setting as well- CIA, DIA, KGB, GRU, Mossad, ORMO, Marauders... it almost makes one's head spin.

[Snake Eyes]

I ran a 1-shot PvP game session back in high school where one team was the surviving crew of a downed B-52 and the other team was a squad of Russians chasing them down. Not a lot of roleplaying involved in that one, but the combat was fun. More tactical wargame than RPG. It was a great way to kill an afternoon, but I imagine turning it into a long-term F2F campaign would have taken a lot of work. I think the grouping feature on RPoL could make that work well on an ongoing basis in a PbP game, though.

Originally Posted by Snake Eyes

I think the grouping feature on RPoL could make that work well on an ongoing basis in a PbP game, though.

I have pondered this notion many...many......MANY times.