PDA

View Full Version : SOF: Most Elite


Raellus
04-08-2010, 01:52 PM
Polls are fun and this subject always seems to lead to interesting and spirited debate. So, which special operations force do you think is the most elite? Please justify your response in the thread.

NOTE: Please don't be offended if I left out the SOF closest to your heart. Space was limited and there are a lot of special operations forces out there. I couldn't include them all. I know the U.S. listing is the largest but they are also fairly well known around the world.

kato13
04-08-2010, 02:43 PM
Close call between SAS, SEALs and Delta, but I went with Delta. I expect Delta spares no expense in training which overshadows slight advantages in SAS tactics and SEAL determination. All IMHO of course.

Frank Frey
04-08-2010, 03:01 PM
In honor of my stepfather who was a US Army Ranger from 1942-1944 (when he was wounded during the Huertegen Forest Campaign)
"RANGERS LEAD THE WAY!"

Out Here
Frank Frey

TiggerCCW UK
04-08-2010, 03:47 PM
Given my small link to the Royal Marines (I was a cadet with them for 7 years, and a cadet instructor for a further 2) I went with SBS. They aren't so well known, but I reckon they're as good as, if not better than any other unit on the list.

Raellus
04-08-2010, 04:27 PM
I'm voting USAF PJs. Their selection program has the highest dropout rate in the U.S. military (something like 90%). They all have to learn trauma aid as well as SF-style combat tactics, parachute insertion, FAC, combat swimming, etc. I don't think they get the same glory because their primary mission is saving lives as opposed to taking them- a sad observation about human nature.

The fact that they are not as well known as most other SOF of the world's major players also gives them some cool points, IMHO. In all of the T2K games I've played or lurked in (or the one I run), I've encountered PCs from just about every SOF on the poll list. I have never run across a USAF PJ. My next American PC will probably be a PJ.

For me, as far as "elite" status goes, the SEALs take second, followed by the SBS.

I've been really into Rangers since I was in the 6th grade. They may not be quite as "elite", but they are definitely just as cool.

Delta is too shadowy and I get the impression that they are CQB/hostage rescue specialists and not very well suited to operating in non-urban environments.

Spetznaz is pretty cool (and scary when I was a kid) but it seems that they invest too much training time into learning how to break bottles and 2x4s on their heads. Impressive or dumb? Hmm.

Webstral
04-08-2010, 04:52 PM
USAF operators are a special crew. It does seem to me like your assessment is pretty on-target, Raellus. We'd give the rescue guys more credit if they were slitting throats. Kevin Costner's character observes in The Guardian that the Navy "...thinks they're better than us [USCG rescue swimmers] because they're combat oriented."

Although class has taken up my time lately, I've been using my time in the car to ponder covering some of New Mexico's Twilight: 2000 history. There's more to the story than just the withdrawal of the School Brigade from Fort Bliss. In particular, I think some exciting options are available for the USAF Special Operations types based outside Albuquerque.

As for the Rangers, who I hold in very high esteem, I'm going to stick with the guidance given me by my first NCO mentor, who had been a Ranger back in the day: "A Ranger is nothing more and nothing less than what every infantryman ought to be."

Webstral

StainlessSteelCynic
04-08-2010, 08:14 PM
I find the list a little too varied, for example GIGN and GSG-9 are specialist police units that deal with counter-terrorism and high threat crime so they are more of an uber-SWAT team than they are a special forces team. Marine recon and Army rangers are certainly elite infantry but they are not special forces. The Foreign Legion again I would call an elite force but not special forces, they have their own special forces within the Legion.
Personally I would be inclined to select the USAF ParaJumpers from the list but I have always admired the Rhodesian Selous Scouts so I'm going with 'Other'.

kota1342000
04-08-2010, 08:22 PM
Moot question. Most of the groups listed have different types of missions. I declare no force is any better than the others, though I have to admit that I hate inter-service rivalry with a passion.

Raellus
04-08-2010, 08:42 PM
It's just for fun, guys. Polls have a limit of 20 choices and I didn't want to be accused of deliberately leaving anyone off of the list. If I put UK Paras on there, then I'd have to put other airborne forces. The FFL have several smaller SOF components but I used the catch-all instead. It's not perfect, admittedly.

Selous Scouts is a very good "other", I must say.

Snake Eyes
04-08-2010, 08:51 PM
USAF Pararescue, hands down. Delta probably gets a nod at being high-speed, low-drag bad-asses, but they pretty much owe their origins to the British SAS who in turn (at least according to the internet) clean up as the most historically successful operators worldwide. I concur with SSC that the list isn't wholly an apples-to-apples role comparison, but for "most elite" I'm going with Pararescue anyway for all the reasons already cited by Rae and Web.

I have been fascinated with PJ's since the first time I saw Airport '75 and let my father convince me that the whole helicopter-to-747 rescue maneuver was possible and there were guys who actually got to do that stuff for real. Plus, on top of everything else, they got to pick up astronauts after splashdown and how cool is that? Pararescue is always my first choice to play as a PC unless the group already has a medic, in which case I'd fall back to a CCT (who are also pretty slick) unless the GM has some kind of anti-SOF bias.

Webstral
04-08-2010, 10:20 PM
Personally I would be inclined to select the USAF ParaJumpers from the list but I have always admired the Rhodesian Selous Scouts so I'm going with 'Other'.

Good "other"! I have taken great interest in the Rhodesian war over the past couple of years. There is so much for us to learn from the experience of the Rhodesians. The Rhodesians are proof that excellence in motivation and training can overcome many material deficits. They are also proof that counter-insurgencies cannot be won on the battlefield alone, no matter how well-fought. Sooner or later, economic and political arrangements become paramount.

Ironically, highly-trained soldiers offer politicians a reason not to avoid bloodshed. "If the troops can kill enough of the enemy, I won't have to convince the major players that they will have to give up something to get peace..."

Webstral

Matt Wiser
04-08-2010, 11:28 PM
SEALs, hands down. For pure SOF, they can do it all, pretty much. And for a Naval outfit, they've been in some pretty landlocked places like Iraq and Afghanistan (two MOHs won in A-Stan, and a third in Iraq, all posthemously). But I'll also add the AF PJs (and the Combat Control Teams) as well. The PJs' job is getting in and rescuing downed aircrew or others in need of rescue in hostile territory, and the CCTs go in with other SOF types to call in air strikes and other support. (usually of the AC-130 and extraction helo type)

headquarters
04-09-2010, 02:11 AM
whats most elite anyways?.

hardest selection /highest drop out rate during selection and training?

actual combat time/terms under fire ?
( some units here see little combat ,some alot )

succesful mission ratio ?

Just asking .In some caces Special Forces just means the above average trained guys you send out whithout qualms about casualties to get the job done.In other cases they are educated to an extreme level in several fields.

I have a suggestion for "other " -Brazillian Military Police Special operations units . ( B.O.P.E) .
A movie was made about them ( tropa de elite -cracking good btw ),their training and their operations.Constant policing action/counterinsurgency operations in the Favelas.The enemy were teens with automatic weapons operating like a guerilla army to protect drug turf.

All Special forces units tend to claim they are the best - or they wouldnt be very special would they ? But I have noticed a tendency to lok to the SAS when tactics and techniques are being developed.

Question for you Anglos/Commonwealthers out there: the AUS/NZ SAS and the GBR SAS - same training etc ? Can Commonwealthers serve in eachothers armies etc ?

TiggerCCW UK
04-09-2010, 02:13 AM
PJ's are an impressive unit. Has anyone read 'That others may live' by SMSGT Jack Brehm? Great read, and the only book I've ever come across about the PJ's.

sglancy12
04-09-2010, 02:26 AM
I can't answer this poll because the term "elite" is so nebulously defined in this context that it is essentially meaningless.


A. Scott Glancy, President TCCorp, dba Pagan Publishing

Canadian Army
04-09-2010, 06:21 AM
My Vote and choice is for The Canadian Special Operations Regiment (CSOR) (French: Régiment d'opérations spéciales du Canada; ROSC), but if it could be any unit in history that I could vote for it would be 1st Special Service Force, The Devil's Brigade.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/1st_Special_Service_Force.patch.jpg

Targan
04-09-2010, 06:39 AM
I would have bundled the Aussie and Kiwi SAS together on the poll - they regularly not only train together but also fight together. It is rare for the Kiwi SAS to be deployed overseas where the Aussie SAS are not operating.

StainlessSteelCynic
04-09-2010, 07:02 AM
Question for you Anglos/Commonwealthers out there: the AUS/NZ SAS and the GBR SAS - same training etc ? Can Commonwealthers serve in eachothers armies etc ?

Very similar training but modified to suit local conditions, e.g. the Australian SAS spend more time in desert training than the UK SAS because it's a significant portion of the terrain they have to operate in.
There is lots of cross-training between the three SAS units and a long history of Australian, New Zealand, South African, Canadian, Rhodesian, Fijian and so on military personnel serving either as individuals signing up to serve in British units or entire units serving within the British military structure like a couple of RAAF units that served in Coastal Command and Bomber Command during WW2 who flew RAF planes.

There is also a history of New Zealand units working within the Australian military structure like various infantry and artillery detachments serving within Australian units during the Vietnam War.
The father of one of my friends (Australian Army) was scheduled to serve with BAOR as a part of their Signals unit during the late 1970s but something happened and he wasn't able to go.

ex3313
04-09-2010, 08:38 AM
Of note the seal/udt recover the astronauts not pj's

Raellus
04-09-2010, 01:23 PM
I would have bundled the Aussie and Kiwi SAS together on the poll - they regularly not only train together but also fight together. It is rare for the Kiwi SAS to be deployed overseas where the Aussie SAS are not operating.

I specifically didn't lump them together because I didn't want to offend any of our Aussie or Kiwi members.

Webstral
04-09-2010, 03:03 PM
I can't answer this poll because the term "elite" is so nebulously defined in this context that it is essentially meaningless.

Perhaps some possible interpretations of the term "elite" might help guide the poll?

Webstral

pmulcahy11b
04-09-2010, 04:28 PM
Perhaps some possible interpretations of the term "elite" might help guide the poll?

Webstral

Of course, anyone who is in the military and really has the "military bug" thinks that they are the most elite...

pmulcahy11b
04-09-2010, 04:30 PM
In the US, SOCOM has become a virtual sixth branch of the military. They tend to mix and match their units -- nominally, you may be a SEAL, Delta, Ranger, SF, etc, but these units inter-operate so much that they are more like simply "SOCOM."

mikeo80
04-09-2010, 08:33 PM
In my very humble opinion, Isreal's Mossad is the best SOF. Get in, get out, get the job done.

This may not fit , cause Mossad is also Intelegence gathering and other duties as assigned.

jester
04-09-2010, 11:33 PM
I vote for Larry the Cable Guy and his elite team of fighters ala Delta Farce! :p


Elite, again we should define elite? Combat monsters, CQB kings, folks who can get in, not get detected and back to the LZ with the package or data? Since their job is not to engage directly <ala Air Force Para Rescuemen <tried to be one once, and I love playing them!> Combat weathermen, or FACs or Anglico>

Guys who can go in and then stir the shit by riging the enemys area to blow?

Guys who can infiltrate and plan a raid to destroy the target?

Snipers? They move in and engage.

We need to define the task, as none of the above is a one group fits all. Can they do all tasks, probably but with varied results as to the task they are assigned.

Seals, cool for working around bodies of water and usualy for short durration ops.

Rangers, they take down airports well! <Then why did they use a platoon or company of SEALS on an airport, when Rangers could have done it as that is what they do?>

It all depends on the task, and the units focus.

StainlessSteelCynic
04-10-2010, 02:38 AM
Stressing the definition of elite is completely irrelevant, everyone knows what it means and that should obviously be the easier part of the question to understand. The original question is which special forces unit do you consider the most elite and so if anything needs defining it is what is a special forces unit.

kato13
04-10-2010, 02:48 AM
Stressing the definition of elite is completely irrelevant, everyone knows what it means and that should obviously be the easier part of the question to understand. The original question is which special forces unit do you consider the most elite and so if anything needs defining it is what is a special forces unit.

I think our varied answers indicate our own varying definitions of elite. Nothing wrong with that since this poll helps us understand what those definitions are.

Dog 6
04-10-2010, 06:26 AM
infantry bah, just a crunchy to me :D

Adm.Lee
04-10-2010, 07:33 AM
I am reminded of a line from a story long ago.

"We're under attack! It must be the American Delta Force!"
"How can you tell?"
"Well, if it were the SAS, we'd be dead already; and if it were the Israelis, we still wouldn't know about it."

jester
04-10-2010, 09:54 AM
BS!!!!!!

Elite:

The Spectre Gunship Crews are considered ELITE in the AF

Submariners are considered ELITE in the Navy

So, defining elite, or the criteria is important! Or at least the objective will determine the whole "eliteness" of the organization.

Are we going with prolonged ground combat?

Anything prolonged then we need to eliminate the SEALS, the Delta and others. As most are mission orientated and not trained or geared for long term operations.

SF, they can go bye bye! As their mission is counter insurgency and working with locals. Kinda like "The Peace Corps" but with guns :)

Snipers, eliminate, they are single mission orientated.

Any of the Air Force types GONE!!! Again specific mission objectives and they are not designed for combat.

If its get in and get out without engaging then some of the above units are good, if its get in and attack different storey. And then if its sustained attack or combat operations then its something else.

RN7
04-10-2010, 10:45 AM
This is probably one of the most difficult questions to answer as a most major armed forces and many smaller ones have special forces which are very tough and suprisingly capable. Also some units no longer exist, the Rhodesian Selous Scouts and the WW2 German Brandenburger commandos had a ferocious reputation.

By taking a unbiased view of the question the Americans would seem to be the best in terms of resources, while in experience the British SAS/SBS are second to none, and the highly secretive Israeli special forces community must be rated as well.

The war against terror over the past 9 years has made a lot of special forces units very experienced. The British probably still set the standard and I would include the Australian/NZ SAS and Canadian JTF2 alongside them, and other European NATO units also have very good reputations. Direct combat experience and cross training with other special forces has made the American special forces community very experienced, and with their level of resources they may be the best overall at the moment.

Personally my own choice would be the British SBS, until recently you had to be a Royal Marine Commando before you even volunteered for selection.

StainlessSteelCynic
04-10-2010, 08:06 PM
BS!!!!!!

Elite:

The Spectre Gunship Crews are considered ELITE in the AF

Submariners are considered ELITE in the Navy

So, defining elite, or the criteria is important! Or at least the objective will determine the whole "eliteness" of the organization.

Are we going with prolonged ground combat?

Anything prolonged then we need to eliminate the SEALS, the Delta and others. As most are mission orientated and not trained or geared for long term operations.

SF, they can go bye bye! As their mission is counter insurgency and working with locals. Kinda like "The Peace Corps" but with guns :)

Snipers, eliminate, they are single mission orientated.

Any of the Air Force types GONE!!! Again specific mission objectives and they are not designed for combat.

If its get in and get out without engaging then some of the above units are good, if its get in and attack different storey. And then if its sustained attack or combat operations then its something else.

You have missed the point of the poll. It is quite explicit in its question - of the SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES listed, which do you consider to be the most elite.

Webstral
04-10-2010, 08:36 PM
BS!!!!!!

Jester, why are you so upset? It's a friendly conversation between people who play a game and share an interest in the military. I like your ideas; I just don't understand why you're so worked up about it. Volume may stun, but it seldom persuades.

Webstral

pmulcahy11b
04-10-2010, 09:48 PM
Let's just settle this once and for all: I'm the most elite.:D

StainlessSteelCynic
04-11-2010, 01:31 AM
Let's just settle this once and for all: I'm the most elite.:D

I have been won over by your persausive argument - I agree.
I'm changing my vote to Paul Mulcahy.

waiting4something
04-11-2010, 08:07 AM
I went with Army Special Forces aka Green Berets. The one's I had run into were cool humble guys. Every person I know that has met some has had the same impression on them too. I mean the dudes are well rounded in their studies, and there not arrogant like many people that reach the elite club. The guys tend to be older which I think is a plus too for having a mature view of things.
I think they don't get the hype the Seals get, because they are a more about working with and training partisan units. They can do all the cool direct action shit, but they can also do non combative shit too and blend with the locals.

pmulcahy11b
04-11-2010, 08:16 AM
I went with Army Special Forces aka Green Berets. The one's I had run into were cool humble guys. Every person I know that has met some has had the same impression on them too. I mean the dudes are well rounded in their studies, and there not arrogant like many people that reach the elite club. The guys tend to be older which I think is a plus too for having a mature view of things.
I think they don't get the hype the Seals get, because they are a more about working with and training partisan units. They can do all the cool direct action shit, but they can also do non combative shit too and blend with the locals.

I'll agree there; some of my best teachers in the Army were former SF troops who were doing duty with regular units after a promotion or because they needed a change of pace. They are those kind of soldiers who "have forgotten more than you'll ever know."

I'll put in a vote for the Air Force CCTs too -- they worked right alongside us at the 82nd Airborne and were every bit as STRAC as soldiers as we were.

jester
04-11-2010, 12:04 PM
Jester, why are you so upset? It's a friendly conversation between people who play a game and share an interest in the military. I like your ideas; I just don't understand why you're so worked up about it. Volume may stun, but it seldom persuades.

Webstral



Who said I was worked up! I'm not! I'm not worked up. Nopt at all, not I say, not!

My point was there are different criteria for ELITE within each force according to that forces or even the Elites organization and mission.

Some are direct combat, some are covert ops, some are traditional comando ops with raids and such.

But, some of the units, are more support rather than "elite." They have high standards and such, which put them in the realm of elite, but as for ability, it isn't really there as a fighting force.

Now let me consult the list once more and make a selection.

And wo to all of you lest I let loose with weapons of mass destruction! My chili and a locked room!

jester
04-11-2010, 12:05 PM
Nope, none of them appealed to me, and I have worked with a good number of such units too.

HorseSoldier
05-10-2010, 11:35 PM
How does one determine most elite?

I voted for CAG (Delta, or whatever they're calling themselves this week) because, while you can in theory be a cook or truck driver or whatever and go to selection and OTC and come out the other end an assaulter (and a small portion of guys do just that) most of the guys who wind up in CAG come out of either the 75th of the SF community.

So, unlike most most other SOF units out there, the majority of CAG assaulters have already been cycled through one SOF selection process before they show up for that selection process. (A similar situation exists with the SBS and the Royal Marines, and your average SAS guy comes out of the Paras, which is also similar.)

Cpl. Kalkwarf
05-11-2010, 06:20 AM
You forgot the little known United states Marine Special Forces, Bored and very enthusiastic Cooks and Bakers. While they lack in specific special forces training they make up with enthusiasm and imagination.

When given an opportunity to do what Marines are supposed to do, this bunch puts there all into it.

Granted my experience in this has been all in the training operation side of it, and no actual combat experience (other then in the bars). Given the opportunity and the equipment they will do some rather amazing things. One particular training exercise which I will not give any more detailed information on to protect the egos of the Marine recon unit, a small group of about a dozen cooks, bakers and mess-men were given a "motivational" training opportunity and taken on an OJT LRRP. They Captured/Killed a larger group of Recon, including a relatively high ranking Officer. Preventing an attack on a Supply and Command Forward operating base. (special note that about half of small unit were veterans of role playing games)

On top of that there were allot more of us that could Handel our booze allot better then the infantry and combat types. (some of the men you never knew they were drunk, cause you never saw them sober). And we felt no pain in the bar fights, before, during, or after.

Hell, the long hours of putting up with insults on our cooking and baking gave us the payback factor when we got the opportunity. In the Marines a cook or a baker was still a Marine. Horrible hours of regular duty followed by normal Training and responsibilities. But as I hear it those elite few are getting fewer and fewer as they are being phased out and replaced by contract civilians more and more.

From a former Elite MOS 3311, Field Baker.

headquarters
05-11-2010, 08:00 AM
You forgot the little known United states Marine Special Forces, Bored and very enthusiastic Cooks and Bakers. While they lack in specific special forces training they make up with enthusiasm and imagination.

When given an opportunity to do what Marines are supposed to do, this bunch puts there all into it.

Granted my experience in this has been all in the training operation side of it, and no actual combat experience (other then in the bars). Given the opportunity and the equipment they will do some rather amazing things. One particular training exercise which I will not give any more detailed information on to protect the egos of the Marine recon unit, a small group of about a dozen cooks, bakers and mess-men were given a "motivational" training opportunity and taken on an OJT LRRP. They Captured/Killed a larger group of Recon, including a relatively high ranking Officer. Preventing an attack on a Supply and Command Forward operating base. (special note that about half of small unit were veterans of role playing games)

On top of that there were allot more of us that could Handel our booze allot better then the infantry and combat types. (some of the men you never knew they were drunk, cause you never saw them sober). And we felt no pain in the bar fights, before, during, or after.

Hell, the long hours of putting up with insults on our cooking and baking gave us the payback factor when we got the opportunity. In the Marines a cook or a baker was still a Marine. Horrible hours of regular duty followed by normal Training and responsibilities. But as I hear it those elite few are getting fewer and fewer as they are being phased out and replaced by contract civilians more and more.

From a former Elite MOS 3311, Field Baker.

Funny story about the SF training camp at Ramsund ,Nothern Norway ,home to the MarinejegerKommando - Something along the lines of Navy seals or there abouts . One saturday some years back a brawl erupted at the local pub off base .The police had to gather deputies from the surrounding counties ( long distances -few people up there ) before they could brake it up .Turns out the base cooks ,( conscripts ), had had it out with some of the SF type guys in the bar .As the story goes the MarineJegers lost the bloody brawl and the brass decided to "split" the times so that it was off limits to either group at interval so that they no longer could chance to meet there .

Raellus
05-11-2010, 11:42 AM
So, unlike most most other SOF units out there, the majority of CAG assaulters have already been cycled through one SOF selection process before they show up for that selection process. (A similar situation exists with the SBS and the Royal Marines, and your average SAS guy comes out of the Paras, which is also similar.)

That's a really good point and a relatively objective way to determine which units qualify as "most elite".

CDAT
04-13-2016, 06:24 PM
I have to agree that this is a hard one to answer. My take on some of them.
SAS/Delta Force - At this point more or less the same the real difference would be the individual operator I think, and are probably the best direct action units.
Green Berets - Most highly trained troops, there job is to go behind enemy lines and train the locals to fight. There medics are from my understanding the highest trained medics in the US Military it has been described to me by several different groups (both in and out of the military) that they are unlicensed physicians. And each of specialties are trained to the same level.
SEALs - A lot of hype to them, but still the best as ship to ship action. (Quiet professionals they are not.)
U.S. Army Rangers - According to the Ranges I worked with they are not really Special Forces, but are Special Operations. To me that does not make much difference but to them it did. Having said that they are the most destructive as they can field up to an entire regiment if needed.

RMC/SBS - My guess is that they would be kind of like the SEAL's just with out all the talk about how they are so great.
French Foreign Legion - I would not class them as a special forces unit, but as they are here kind of like the Rangers maybe.
Marine Recon - Not a special forces unit. Great scouts, and all that, but not special forces.
USAF PJs - Best prehosbital care, see reply below.
GSG-9 - Best law enforcement special action team.
Spetznaz - As this is a class not a specific group can not comment. They have lots of different groups that are called Spetznaz and they are very different for example my under standing that group "Alpha" is there version of the SAS/Delta, but they also have some for SEAL's and so on.
KSK/GIGN - Do not know enough about them to comment.

I spent about Eight years working EOD, during my three deployments of a year to a year and a half each I got to work with/for/or around lots of the Special Forces types, including all US and some foreign (never for, but around the foreign)

I'm voting USAF PJs. Their selection program has the highest dropout rate in the U.S. military (something like 90%). They all have to learn trauma aid as well as SF-style combat tactics, parachute insertion, FAC, combat swimming, etc. I don't think they get the same glory because their primary mission is saving lives as opposed to taking them- a sad observation about human nature.

This is different than what I got from all of them, I was told when asking (my cousin was looking at trying to go special forces at the time). I was told that the PJ is the easiest way to get into the Special Forces community. Ranger is the easiest way into the special operations community.

Delta is too shadowy and I get the impression that they are CQB/hostage rescue specialists and not very well suited to operating in non-urban environments.

I can say that they work super well in the urban environment, and also the desert.

And last but not least who is the craziest of them all? I have to give this to the Australian SAS (I do not know if there were others with them) I did not work with/for them, but around them and they take the cake as far as I have ever seen.

Raellus
04-13-2016, 06:37 PM
This is different than what I got from all of them, I was told when asking (my cousin was looking at trying to go special forces at the time). I was told that the PJ is the easiest way to get into the Special Forces community.

I suggest doing a little research on the PJs instead of taking your cousin's word for it. He may be right, but that's quite a claim to take on "authority".

And last but not least who is the craziest of them all? I have to give this to the Australian SAS (I do not know if there were others with them) I did not work with/for them, but around them and they take the cake as far as I have ever seen.

What about those Spetznaz guys that kung fu kick one another and break bottles and two-by-fours over their heads at demonstrations. I'm not sure that kind of stuff proves anyone's "elite" but it does seem to indicate a lack of good judgment and/or problem-solving skills.

CDAT
04-13-2016, 06:51 PM
I suggest doing a little research on the PJs instead of taking your cousin's word for it. He may be right, but that's quite a claim to take on "authority".

It was not from him, it was from them for him. So from the PJ's them self. He later decided to go to medical school instead of joining.

What about those Spetznaz guys that kung fu kick one another and break bottles and two-by-fours over their heads at demonstrations. I'm not sure that kind of stuff proves anyone's "elite" but it does seem to indicate a lack of good judgment and/or problem-solving skills.
Just the lack of good judgment/problem-solving skills does not make you crazy.

Raellus
04-13-2016, 07:18 PM
It was not from him, it was from them for him. So from the PJ's them self. He later decided to go to medical school instead of joining.

Then they had a vested interest in telling him that, right? They were recruiting him, were they not?

.45cultist
04-13-2016, 07:34 PM
Another "other" unit is the CIA SAD teams who draw from the operator community. BTW, the third top tear medal- The Intelligence Cross is pretty much a posthumous award. But SAD(can't remember their previous moniker) would be available to fight the KGB and GRU teams in Krakow and elsewhere. As spies it would be best not to get caught though.

WallShadow
04-17-2016, 09:57 PM
(Snip)

As for the Rangers, who I hold in very high esteem, I'm going to stick with the guidance given me by my first NCO mentor, who had been a Ranger back in the day: "A Ranger is nothing more and nothing less than what every infantryman ought to be.Webstral

To jump genres, Webstrall, Your NCO sounds like a Dorsai.;)

bobcat
04-17-2016, 09:58 PM
i have to go with the blanket heads for this. they have to be able to kick in doors, shoot people and break things like everyone else. and on top of that they have to be able to teach people who have probably never even seen a modern weapon before how to fight a war behind enemy lines. imagine combining rambo, a college professor, and james bond into one person. chuck noris isn't even that good.

Draq
08-12-2016, 01:03 AM
An excellent list. I'd have to say MACV-SOG. Not to diminish any other organization. And the Gurkhas.