PDA

View Full Version : Potential Australian/New Zealand/East Timor/Indonesia conflict (was Red Dawn Remake


Targan
04-12-2010, 02:50 AM
Well I still get freaked out a little every time I think about Indonesia. People have told me time and again that the Indonesian military is qualitatively no match for Australia and New Zealand's armed forces but as an Australian I can't help but feel a bit threatened by Indonesia. Not so much as an immediate threat but a potential future threat. I mean there are what, around 21 million Australians. And our closest neighbour is the largest Muslim nation in the world with somewhere in the vicinity of 230 million people! All crowded on an archipelago in not particularly fantastic living conditions.

I don't think it takes a great leap of imagination to envisage a day where world conditions have deteriorated, rising sea levels eat away more and more of Indonesia's land mass, the military regain some of the power they have lost in the past 15 years and a more militant or (heaven forbid) radical Islamist government takes power. Right now Australia has powerful friends that would tend to scare off any conceivable military threat to Australia but that might not last forever. One of my big regrets is that if Australia and Indonesia ever enter into a serious stoush I'll be too old to do my part for my country in the manner my warrior spirit would want me to. I'll just have to find a sneakier way to have a go at the enemy.

I'm sure that most Indonesians are really nice people but take a look at what the Indonesian military and military-backed militias did in places like East Timor. That was only a few years ago and it was really, really nasty. The Indonesian military clearly has few qualms about engaging in activities that most western militaries would find abhorrent.

waiting4something
04-12-2010, 06:53 AM
East timor was hardly even covered in the U.S. media(no big surprise), but I'm sure the sports world was.:rolleyes: It is a wake call to most of us that believe bad things can't happen in modern times, but bad shit like that happens in places like the Congo a lot. We just blow it off and wonder who will be eliminated on American Idol.:( So yeah, I think one day we may be in for a rude awaking. For the U.S.A. our version of this would be Mexico. I always thought invading Mexico was more important then fighting in Iraq and Afganistan, and lately things are getting real interesting on the border.

I remember when I was in Indonesia for a short while. I was blown away by how third world it was. It reminded me of pictures in Soldier of Fortune magazine of Central America back in the 1980's. When I was touring one of the Indonesia Marine bases there I saw they even still had PT-76 tanks!

Legbreaker
04-12-2010, 07:54 AM
Back in the day, we trained to fight against the mysterious Kamarians who's country was located somewhere around where Indonesia is - but definitely NOT Indonesia.... ;)

Rumour had it that if the Indonesians had the will, and managed to quickly obtain enough transport ships, they could be halfway across Australia before we were even able to mobilise. A couple of weeks later and Australia would consist of little more than the 400,000 living on Tasmania plus another 50,000 or so refugees from the mainland.

Of course there were a number of prerequisites for that scenario to occur (namely will and transport), but it was a topic of discussion late at night around the Company bar - the consensus was that as a unit we'd hit the hills and do what we could from there.

headquarters
04-12-2010, 08:32 AM
Targan , you will be the grey haired gentleman with a brodie helmet and gasmask bag on your chest running around shouting all those insolent teenagers to attention in your towns home defense force.You might not be able to endure all the physical hardship that the younger ones can -but fighting a war isnt about running old chap .It is about holding your position and making the enemy run.

having the will to fight is pre requisite no 1 in a situation where national sovereignity is at stake in a sudden crisis or invasion.

The fellows who sank the Blucher the 9th of April 1940 ( one of the worlds most advanced and powerful warships at the time ) were reservists and the commander was in his 60s if I recall correctly .The guns were from the last half of the 1800s..The Kriegsmarine was cheeky and sent an esqadrille up the Oslofjord to capture our goverment,king and capitol in one fouls swoop in the guise of darkness,but they had to pass a narrow strait guarded by antique guns and a crew of reservist with a 3 week conscription in the 1920s behind them before they were recalled for this duty(!).The leaders were retired officers of ripe age.

The professional soldiers and young men in charge of the defense of our nation were biting their nails in fear and confusion, fleeing,surrendering,running around screaming incoherently ,and politicians were milling about with no clear orders - the decision to fight the approaching ships -and thus entering world war two was made by the unlikely heros of a band of reservists with little training and some old warhorses -some who had come out of retirement to take up posts at the Oscarsborg fortress in the Oslofjord -voluntarily.

It is a part of the story that the nationality of the ships approaching was unknown at the time the battery fired -for all they knew they might have been british!(We have fought them before you know).
But turns out -they were the boche and bobs your uncle -Norway became one of the allies.We were neutral at the time ,and the brits and the jerries both violated our neutrality .War with either seemed likely if it came to a situation with a push.
.

In a sudden invasion there will be panic and confusion -and as Legbreaker says -many professional military men will head for the hills because of the seemingly hopeless situation .Politicians and business men will back out in many cases -not willing to bear the responsibility for decisions that will lead to deaths.The fight is then left to reservists,volunteers and whoever else happens to be caught in the fighting .

Get a khaki kookabura slouch hat and some wide baggy shorts and go for it mate !


Well I still get freaked out a little every time I think about Indonesia. People have told me time and again that the Indonesian military is qualitatively no match for Australia and New Zealand's armed forces but as an Australian I can't help but feel a bit threatened by Indonesia. Not so much as an immediate threat but a potential future threat. I mean there are what, around 21 million Australians. And our closest neighbour is the largest Muslim nation in the world with somewhere in the vicinity of 230 million people! All crowded on an archipelago in not particularly fantastic living conditions.

I don't think it takes a great leap of imagination to envisage a day where world conditions have deteriorated, rising sea levels eat away more and more of Indonesia's land mass, the military regain some of the power they have lost in the past 15 years and a more militant or (heaven forbid) radical Islamist government takes power. Right now Australia has powerful friends that would tend to scare off any conceivable military threat to Australia but that might not last forever. One of my big regrets is that if Australia and Indonesia ever enter into a serious stoush I'll be too old to do my part for my country in the manner my warrior spirit would want me to. I'll just have to find a sneakier way to have a go at the enemy.

I'm sure that most Indonesians are really nice people but take a look at what the Indonesian military and military-backed militias did in places like East Timor. That was only a few years ago and it was really, really nasty. The Indonesian military clearly has few qualms about engaging in activities that most western militaries would find abhorrent.

Legbreaker
04-12-2010, 09:02 AM
...and as Legbreaker says -many professional military men will head for the hills because of the seemingly hopeless situation .Politicians and business men will back out in many cases -not willing to bear the responsibility for decisions that will lead to deaths.The fight is then left to reservists,volunteers and whoever else happens to be caught in the fighting.
At the time we were reservists which was one of the reasons the hills were looking so good - home turf which some of us knew like the backs of our hands, not to mention our unit had suffered through quite a number of years of cutbacks in funding - we didn't think we'd be a priority to receive ammo, weapons, body armour (not that it was all that common then), and everything else necessary for a modern battlefield.
Fortunately most of us had our own arsenals to bolster the worn out M60s and two dozen L1A1s in the armoury, not to mention access to plenty of explosives (much of it home made).

The way we saw it, the regular soldiers would be toast in a rather short space of time and the majority of civilians would either choose not to fight, or be rolled over in a heartbeat. Us poor reservists along with whoever we could find willing and able to listen to us had the best chance of resistance long term.

Nearly 20 years later that attitude seems rather naive, but, we were young and thought we knew the answers to everything...

Webstral
04-12-2010, 12:49 PM
Perhaps the Australian version of Red Dawn should be called Crescent Moon Rising.

Webstral

pmulcahy11b
04-12-2010, 04:06 PM
East timor was hardly even covered in the U.S. media(no big surprise), but I'm sure the sports world was.:rolleyes:

It wasn't much, though MSNBC covered it here in the US more than most. East Timor actually made it into the plot of several episodes of JAG as well, believe it or not.

headquarters
04-13-2010, 04:09 AM
I hear you .No critisizm intended whatsoever of you guys.
I just wanted to point out that our experiences has taught us not to trust the military to protect us - thats why we have had enthusiastic conscription and gusn in every house for 50 years ..Thats all coming to an end now ,with the increased focus on assymetrical warfare and operations abroad to quell the insurgencies in the sands and the Hindukush.

As you say - we thought the same thing back in the 90s when we were young and running our guns on the tundra up north .We were told ( unofficially )that our gear and resources were for two purposes :

start a shooting match so that no political solution would leave us in any diplomatic capacity aligned with the invading Ruskies

hold out for 14 days to allow the US- ,Roya-l,Konglichje- Marines and the Canucks to get here and push the communist aggressors out into the North Sea.
I believe we also had Bundeswehr and Italian Alpini alotted to our sector if the big one went off.

Of course -it was all winding down then, and everything was sort of in a vacuum .No idelogically motivated superpower enemy at our border anymore ? huh?

I still believe in conscription and that our military should be geared towards keeping our soverignity intact on our home turf .But I dont feel good about pulling out of all the shitholes either..


At the time we were reservists which was one of the reasons the hills were looking so good - home turf which some of us knew like the backs of our hands, not to mention our unit had suffered through quite a number of years of cutbacks in funding - we didn't think we'd be a priority to receive ammo, weapons, body armour (not that it was all that common then), and everything else necessary for a modern battlefield.
Fortunately most of us had our own arsenals to bolster the worn out M60s and two dozen L1A1s in the armoury, not to mention access to plenty of explosives (much of it home made).

The way we saw it, the regular soldiers would be toast in a rather short space of time and the majority of civilians would either choose not to fight, or be rolled over in a heartbeat. Us poor reservists along with whoever we could find willing and able to listen to us had the best chance of resistance long term.

Nearly 20 years later that attitude seems rather naive, but, we were young and thought we knew the answers to everything...

waiting4something
04-13-2010, 04:30 AM
It wasn't much, though MSNBC covered it here in the US more than most. East Timor actually made it into the plot of several episodes of JAG as well, believe it or not.

I can't believe it.:p But, I was like 13 at the time, so I'll take your word for it.;) I just remember being interested in it, but what was shown was very vague.

StainlessSteelCynic
04-13-2010, 09:28 AM
One of my friends was asked if he would rejoin the military when the fighting in East Timor occured. His cousin (female) was married to an ex-SAS guy who was also asked to come back

Webstral
04-13-2010, 01:32 PM
But, I was like 13 at the time, so I'll take your word for it.;) I just remember being interested in it, but what was shown was very vague.


Dude, you're killing me.

Webstral

pmulcahy11b
04-13-2010, 02:45 PM
I can't believe it.:p But, I was like 13 at the time, so I'll take your word for it.;) I just remember being interested in it, but what was shown was very vague.

You said it, Web! I'm almost old enough to be his grandfather!

waiting4something
04-13-2010, 03:28 PM
You said it, Web! I'm almost old enough to be his grandfather!

No, I just had my timeline screwed up I thought that it happened in the early 1990's, for some reason.:o How I was this far off I don't know?:confused: I could have swore something happen there back then, but I looked and I'm dead wrong. Sorry about that.

Legbreaker
04-13-2010, 06:36 PM
As far as I'm aware, the US barely had any involvement at all in East Timor. Most of the work was done by Australians with some small support from a few other nations.
The UN basically washed it's hands of the situation, at least in the first few months.

Of course with the intial invasion by Indonesia occuring back in the 70's, and the Australian government of the day sitting on their hands in fear of a confrontation, it was about time we did something good for the East Timorese.

headquarters
04-14-2010, 02:16 AM
No, I just had my timeline screwed up I thought that it happened in the early 1990's, for some reason.:o How I was this far off I don't know?:confused: I could have swore something happen there back then, but I looked and I'm dead wrong. Sorry about that.

Actually , East Timor in particular and Indonesia in general has been a powderkeg with numerous civil wars and insurgencies ( not to mention banditry,piracy and religious strife ) for a long time.

Reports of bombings,guerilla warfare and oppression have been plentiful ever since modern media coverage started.

I wonder if the incident in the 90s tho which you refer is the student massacre -same old story,unarmed students with flowers and slogans ,armed security forces with short temper .I know that it was one of the turning points in the East Timorese war for independence in the way that it brought attention and brought East Timorese together in support of the Fretellin.

It rang a bell .

headquarters
04-14-2010, 02:18 AM
But will you give back the oilfields that the Indonesians grabbed from the East Timorese and subsequently sold to Australia ....


:D

As far as I'm aware, the US barely had any involvement at all in East Timor. Most of the work was done by Australians with some small support from a few other nations.
The UN basically washed it's hands of the situation, at least in the first few months.

Of course with the intial invasion by Indonesia occuring back in the 70's, and the Australian government of the day sitting on their hands in fear of a confrontation, it was about time we did something good for the East Timorese.

Targan
04-14-2010, 02:38 AM
But will you give back the oilfields that the Indonesians grabbed from the East Timorese and subsequently sold to Australia ....

There are differing opinions on this point. Once East Timor gained independence large undersea areas with oil and gas reserves that should probably have belonged to the new East Timorese nation ended up either under Australian control or are jointly controlled by Australia and East Timor. Some might see it as Australia taking advantage of East Timor but then again with Australian help and joint control East Timor is likely to see those gas and oilfields developed much faster and also East Timor will be in a stronger position to get a decent income out of it (my point being that without Australia's help it would be easy for petro-chemical companies to drive a hard bargain and basically rip East Timor off).

I'm not sure how to feel about it yet. Part of me thinks that without Australian and New Zealand help East Timor would still be a province of Indonesia. And Australia is still providing heaps of support (financial, security, logistical) to East Timor. I haven't been to East Timor myself so I don't know how people on the ground there feel about the situation.

headquarters
04-14-2010, 03:11 AM
I wasnt slamming the Aussie/Kiwi Union -really .
You guys seem to be the good guys pretty much all the time.

So it was sort of a cheeky comment to Legbreaker just to rattle the cage .


I will behave .

But this discussion should spawn another topic - Indonesia/Australia/Kiwiland relations and situation in T2k .

Someone started saying something about possible Indonesian invasion in the future - but wouldnt an active policy of destabilizing Indonesia and a cut of from western military aid/products really throw sand in an Indonesian war effort ? I mean they already have a dozen insurgencies to handle and difficult terrain to control.

Also -given Australias vast landmass- couldnt you Aussies fight a delaying action and give them the crocodile infected swamps and deserts for long enough to mobilize and train a million bludgers ,produce enough kookaburra slouch hats and give `em a blue that they wouldnt ever forget ?I reckon this to be a fair dinkum analyzis.

Any invasion force would have to come to the south coast to get to any of the strategically important areas wouldnt they ?A hundred thousand cursing bushies with slouch hats would have to be battled firstly in Western Australia or in the jungles up north ?

There are differing opinions on this point. Once East Timor gained independence large undersea areas with oil and gas reserves that should probably have belonged to the new East Timorese nation ended up either under Australian control or are jointly controlled by Australia and East Timor. Some might see it as Australia taking advantage of East Timor but then again with Australian help and joint control East Timor is likely to see those gas and oilfields developed much faster and also East Timor will be in a stronger position to get a decent income out of it (my point being that without Australia's help it would be easy for petro-chemical companies to drive a hard bargain and basically rip East Timor off).

I'm not sure how to feel about it yet. Part of me thinks that without Australian and New Zealand help East Timor would still be a province of Indonesia. And Australia is still providing heaps of support (financial, security, logistical) to East Timor. I haven't been to East Timor myself so I don't know how people on the ground there feel about the situation.

Webstral
04-14-2010, 12:33 PM
I think a fight between Australian, New Zealand, and East Timor forces on one side and Indonesia on the other would make an excellent techno-thriller. Mind, I'm not actually advocating such a fight. I'd just like to read some well-researched, well-written fiction on the subject.

Webstral

Adm.Lee
04-14-2010, 01:26 PM
I think a fight between Australian, New Zealand, and East Timor forces on one side and Indonesia on the other would make an excellent techno-thriller.

I remember researching this in Jane's Fighting ships, and some other sources, back in the '90s, when I had better access to a university library. The only thing that I remember was that the navies were sort of well-matched in numbers, at least, but the air was much more in the Australians' favor.

Transport would be a huge problem for the invaders, as well as space.

Let's also not forget that if a war includes an English-speaking Navy, that side has almost never lost.

Webstral
04-14-2010, 02:37 PM
Transport would be a huge problem for the invaders, as well as space.

Agreed. So if we assume that the Indonesians are the aggressors (Why not? It's fiction.), the Indonesians would be aware of this. They would have to tailor their goals and methods to what they thought could be achieved. They would have to find some ways around anglophone air superiority. An outright invasion of Australia might be impossible for the immediate future, but perhaps our fictitious Indonesians are more interested in recapturing East Timor? ANZ forces come in on the side of the East Timorese. The Indonesians might plan to fight the air-sea battle in Indonesian waters. Perhaps some sort of build-up scheme would circumvent ANZ interdiction efforts, turning the fight into a slog-out on the ground. The Indonesians have a lot more bodies to throw into the fight, provided they can get them to the right place. The story could move along parallel tracks, with outnumbered ANZ and East Timorese grunts defending on the ground and ANZ air-naval assets attempting to secure control of the air and sea approaches to the island.

Of course, some means of politically neutralizing the US and the UK would have to be devised.

Webstral

pmulcahy11b
04-14-2010, 02:56 PM
I think a fight between Australian, New Zealand, and East Timor forces on one side and Indonesia on the other would make an excellent techno-thriller. Mind, I'm not actually advocating such a fight. I'd just like to read some well-researched, well-written fiction on the subject.

Webstral

One could add in some secret assistance to the ANZ forces by the flyers at Dale Brown's HAWC.

kato13
04-14-2010, 03:01 PM
For reference
Indonesian Naval Forces 2007

Navy ε45,000 (including Marines and Aviation)
EQUIPMENT BY TYPE

SUBMARINES
TACTICAL
SSK 2:
2 Cakra† each with 8 single 533mm TT with 14 SUT HWT

PRINCIPAL SURFACE COMBATANTS 28

FRIGATES 12
FFG 10:
6 Ahmad Yani each with 2 Mk 141 Harpoon quad (8 eff.) each with 1 RGM-84A Harpoon tactical SSM, 2 SIMBAD x2 manual each with Mistral SAM, 2 triple 324mm ASTT (6 eff.) each with Mk 46 LWT, 1 76mm gun, (capacity either 1 HAS-1 Wasp ASW hel or 1 NBO-105 (BO-105) utl hel)

3 Fatahillah each with 2 twin (4 eff.) each with 1 MM-38 Exocet tactical SSM, 2 B515 ILAS-3/triple 324mm ASTT (2-6 eff.) (not on Nala) with 12 A244/Mk 46, 1 2 tube Bofors 375mm (2 eff.), 1 120mm gun

1 Hajar Dewantara (trg) with 2 twin (4 eff.) each with 1 MM-38 Exocet tactical SSM, 2 x1 533mm ASTT each with SUT HWT, (capacity 1 NBO-105 (BO-105) utl hel)

FF 2:
2 Samadikun each with 2 triple 324mm ASTT (6 eff.) each with Mk 46 LWT, 1 76mm gun

CORVETTES 16
16 Kapitan Patimura† each with 4 x1 400mm ASTT, Twin each with SA-N-5 Grail SAM, 2 RBU 6000 Smerch 2 (24 eff.), 1 57mm gun
2 Sigma (first of class currently undergoing sea trials expected ISD late 2007; with second of class in build)

PATROL AND COASTAL COMBATANTS 37

PFM 4:
4 Mandau each with 4 MM-38 Exocet tactical SSM

PCT 4:
4 Singa each with 2 Single 533mm TT

PCO 8: 4 Kakap; 4 Todak

PCC 21:
13 Kobra KAL-35 each with 2 20mm gun

8 Sibarau

MINE WARFARE
MINE COUNTERMEASURES 12
MCC 3: 1 Pulau Rani; 2 Pulau Rengat

MSC 9: 9 Palau Rote†

AMPHIBIOUS

PRINCIPAL AMPHIBIOUS VESSELS
LPD 1: 1 Tanjung Dalpele (capacity 2 LCU)

LS LST 26:
1 Teluk Amboina (capacity 16 tanks; 200 troops);
12 Teluk Gilimanuk;
7 Teluk Langsa (capacity 16 tanks; 200 troops);
6 Teluk Semangka (capacity 17 tanks; 200 troops)

CRAFT 54 LCU

LOGISTICS AND SUPPORT 16:
AGOR 7
AO 2: 1 Arun; 1 Sorong
AOT: 2 Khobi
AR 1
ATF 2
RY 1 (Presidential Yacht)
Spt 1

Legbreaker
04-14-2010, 06:30 PM
Of course, some means of politically neutralizing the US and the UK would have to be devised.

That's easy. Just tell them what countries are involved and the Americans won't have a clue where to go, ;) and the UK will justify non-involvement by claiming Ireland is flaring up again.

Seriously though Ireland might be a possible distraction for the English and if they've got troops still in the middle east, chances are they'll have nothing left to send to Asia.

The US on the other hand, well they couldnt' be bothered the first time around, why would they bother the second, especially if it's not being fought on Australian ground or directly threatening (thereby activating treaty obligations).

Webstral
04-14-2010, 06:49 PM
The US on the other hand, well they couldnt' be bothered the first time around, why would they bother the second, especially if it's not being fought on Australian ground or directly threatening (thereby activating treaty obligations).

We're talking apples and oranges. A high-tempo conventional war involving Australian and New Zealand forces and instigated by Indonesia almost certainly would draw in the US. I don't know how many ground-pounders would be involved, but it's hard to imagine the US Navy sitting on the sidelines while the navies of Australia and/or New Zealand are duking it out with another regional power--unless fault could be found with the other ANZUS allies. This is the route that an aggressive, fictitious Indonesia would to take to convince the US to stay out of the fight. How that would be managed I don't know. Perhaps that's something our Australian cousins can divine best. I'd be open to suggestions that rise to a higher standard than bad-mouthing.

Webstral

Legbreaker
04-14-2010, 07:44 PM
Perhaps they were already involved elsewhere such as China, or Korea sparks up again?

pmulcahy11b
04-14-2010, 07:56 PM
Perhaps they were already involved elsewhere such as China, or Korea sparks up again?

Or Iraq and Afghanistan.

Legbreaker
04-14-2010, 08:03 PM
...or Mexico, or against those evil Canadians....

:D

boogiedowndonovan
04-14-2010, 08:50 PM
anyone out there remember a guy that went by the handle Ballistix? I think his real name was Damian Robinson. He had an order of battle for the invasion of Australia by Indonesia, including a provisional battalion of US troops stranded in Australia after their convoy was sunk. I can't recall if he had anything about why Indonesia invades.

as for motivations, my understanding is that in the 60's there was a low level conflict between Indonesia and neighboring Malaysia with Britain and Australia intervening on the side of Malaysia. That conflict was over the future of Malaysia and the sultanate of Brunei.

Suppose a radical Islamic faction takes power in Indonesia and not only talks of recovering all of Borneo, but also of establishing a Southeast Asian Islamic Emirate encompassing parts of Thailand, parts of the Phillipines and all of Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei. The radicalized government then provides covert support to equally radical Islamic groups based in Malaysia and Brunei. These groups then commit terrorist acts to destabilize the governments of Malaysia and Brunei, and as these two governments respond, Indonesia intervenes.

We could also throw in the East Timor situation. As Indonesian troops deploy to Borneo to assist the Islamic groups fighting the Malaysians and Brunei, they organize citizen's militias on East Timor to maintain order. The citizen's militias on East Timor act without impunity while enforcing order, which incites unrest among the pro-independence East Timorese.

The Australians intervene to help their neighbors, Malaysia and Brunei.

As far as US and UK involvement, at the request of the Sultan the UK does station a battalion of Ghurkas in Brunei. I can't recall what T2k canon says for the battalion of Ghurkas stationed in Brunei, if they deployed with the other Ghurkas to Hong Kong or elsewhere. As for the US involvement...oil. There are significant oil fields in or off the coast Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia. Also, consider the Straits of Malacca, which passes between Malaysia and Indonesia, huge amounts of ship traffic, including oil tankers use the Straits to cross from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean.

I also read somewhere that New Zealand had an infantry battalion stationed in Singapore, so its possible this battalion would be involved. New Zealand would probably be involved anyways if Australia already is.

Now, a T2k US military straining to fight in Central Europe, the Middle East and Korea, wouldn't be able to dedicate many resources to fight a radicalized Islamic Indonesia, but I think they would devote something to protect a source of petroleum as well as a major supply line. Plus, we're the good guys. :)

Anyways, thats what I use in my campaign. What do you think? Too far fetched? I don't have my books in front of me, but doesn't T2k V2.0 have the Australians and Indonesians fighting over Papua New Guinea, and Merc 2000 has the Australians occupying Indonesia?

ps. Kato, maybe its time to split this out from the Red Dawn Remake thread?

pmulcahy11b
04-14-2010, 09:03 PM
Don't forget the Indonesian/Canadian conspiracy!

StainlessSteelCynic
04-14-2010, 09:33 PM
anyone out there remember a guy that went by the handle Ballistix? I think his real name was Damian Robinson. He had an order of battle for the invasion of Australia by Indonesia, including a provisional battalion of US troops stranded in Australia after their convoy was sunk. I can't recall if he had anything about why Indonesia invades
I think his page can still be found via the internet wayback machine but I don't know where to look. I'll ask some friends who are more inclined to save old web addresses.

as for motivations, my understanding is that in the 60's there was a low level conflict between Indonesia and neighboring Malaysia with Britain and Australia intervening on the side of Malaysia. That conflict was over the future of Malaysia and the sultanate of Brunei.

Suppose a radical Islamic faction takes power in Indonesia and not only talks of recovering all of Borneo, but also of establishing a Southeast Asian Islamic Emirate encompassing parts of Thailand, parts of the Phillipines and all of Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei. The radicalized government then provides covert support to equally radical Islamic groups based in Malaysia and Brunei. These groups then commit terrorist acts to destabilize the governments of Malaysia and Brunei, and as these two governments respond, Indonesia intervenes.

We could also throw in the East Timor situation. As Indonesian troops deploy to Borneo to assist the Islamic groups fighting the Malaysians and Brunei, they organize citizen's militias on East Timor to maintain order. The citizen's militias on East Timor act without impunity while enforcing order, which incites unrest among the pro-independence East Timorese.

The Australians intervene to help their neighbors, Malaysia and Brunei.
Indonesia has had plans for quite some time (since the 1950s at least) for expanding its land, simply because they have so many people on so little ground but also for other more 'empire building' reasons. They've not needed another excuse to believe that all of Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, parts of Thailand, all of Timor & Papua New Guinea and also a significant chunk of Australia should be part of the greater Indonesian empire. They need "living room" and resources and they claim Australia is part of Asia and should be Asian, not European.
And quite frankly, there's plenty of people in power in Indonesia who have hated Australia for quite some time because they see us as being the remnants of the old 'white' imperialist regimes

As far as US and UK involvement, at the request of the Sultan the UK does station a battalion of Ghurkas in Brunei. I can't recall what T2k canon says for the battalion of Ghurkas stationed in Brunei, if they deployed with the other Ghurkas to Hong Kong or elsewhere. As for the US involvement...oil. There are significant oil fields in or off the coast Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia. Also, consider the Straits of Malacca, which passes between Malaysia and Indonesia, huge amounts of ship traffic, including oil tankers use the Straits to cross from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean.

I also read somewhere that New Zealand had an infantry battalion stationed in Singapore, so its possible this battalion would be involved. New Zealand would probably be involved anyways if Australia already is.

Now, a T2k US military straining to fight in Central Europe, the Middle East and Korea, wouldn't be able to dedicate many resources to fight a radicalized Islamic Indonesia, but I think they would devote something to protect a source of petroleum as well as a major supply line. Plus, we're the good guys. :)

Anyways, thats what I use in my campaign. What do you think? Too far fetched? I don't have my books in front of me, but doesn't T2k V2.0 have the Australians and Indonesians fighting over Papua New Guinea, and Merc 2000 has the Australians occupying Indonesia?
Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the UK & USA all have defence treaties regarding this region so it shouldn't really be all that difficult to invoke the clauses needed for military action once the Indonesians commit any act of aggression to a treaty member

ps. Kato, maybe its time to split this out from the Red Dawn Remake thread?
I agree, there are some other threads I recall dealing with this issue somewhere here in the forum so perhaps if someone can find the links we can split this part into a new thread with links to the other relevant threads?

headquarters
04-15-2010, 02:56 AM
just a few thoughts for discussion..

I think that a few facts that need to be accounted for in a fictious war between ANZ and Indonesia for supremacy and oil in the region .

The oil involved will mean that the UK and the US will spare little expence to ensure there is no treath to Brunei. The sole reason for maintaining this nation was to secure the oil after the colonial era ended.

The Indonesians know this and play the part of the disgruntled neighbour that needs to be placated by Bruneis supporters.Look at the arms deals between the US/UK and Indonesia over the years.

It has been the way of London/Washington to allow the Indonesian dictators wiggleroom to keep from getting communists or in our time islamists in Djakarta.

So given the unofficial support of these major players how would an Indonesian/ANZ war ferment and escalate ?
For the US and UK to abandon its allies in the Axis of G`day seems unthinkable.
But losing Indonesia is a hairy prospect as well because of shipping lanes,oil and the sheer size of it and its population.

Also the Indonesians are not a homogenous population .They represent alot of different ethnicities ,languages ,religions and social classes.
Uniting these in holy war /Jihad would take a major civil war first or the islamists would have a two front war going ,possibly three as there are divides between the moslems that run quite deep .(Indonesians have moslems of the youtube with AKs variety ,but also modern/liberals that wouldnt dream of waging war less it was self defense).

Anyways -these are just a few of my thoughts -and I surely did not mean to start a political discussion -but a backdrop to said scenario.

In the near future the fate of nations hang in the balance .In a tropical hell one man will fight a war that can change human history for hundreds of years.Battles fiercer than anything the world has seen since the world war will rage on the sea and in the air.From the byzantine halls of power in Beijing to steps of the Capitol, a conspiracy that will shock the world will unravel...

Perhaps a closer alignment/mutual support with Beijing for Indonesia,a US bogged down in costly wars in the middle east (possibly on new fronts )with some sort of economical crisis that depletes its navy /airforce so that it cant intervene at will anymore- and then a political gambit from Djakarta /Beijing to seize the oil in the region ..But something goes horribly wrong..Circumstances lead to a spark that sets of the tense situation and before anyone understands it a full blown shooting match ensues.

headquarters
04-15-2010, 08:21 AM
Now that RL events have thrown sand in the FtF machine and my flight isnt able to go due to ash in the air I came up with another idea.

It looks like it is driving the car time. ( 8 hrs ..well its an FtF)

Indonesia or the region as a whole probably has a few good sized volcanos.A prolonged eruption with consecutive bursts of ash into the air/atmosphere could create huge no fly zones that bar any airtraffic.They extend greatly,move at speed and are unpredictable in as much as the winds and jetstreams control the direction of the ashes.

Such an event could hamper military operations in the air to an extent that airsupport would only be available from time to time.This would mean a huge difference in the way a modern war play out and allow less powerful militaries with big manpower and ruthless leadership room to attain some objectives .

Volcanic eruptions can last for years with periods of relative calm followed by periods of eruptive /explosive activity.

Apparently the ash is incredibly harmful to jet and prop planes alike,but especially jets as the turbines are damaged quite fast.And yeah -this means no Tomahawks either...

Could be a useful little something to drop into a stew of technothriller events that lead up to an ANZ/Indonesian brawl.

pmulcahy11b
04-15-2010, 08:40 AM
If you're going to throw an Indonesian volcano into the mix:

1) You could put in some non-combat problems and casualties due to the fact that volcanic ash contains a good amount of what is basically glass. If you're close enough and sudden enough, you could have mass casualties from lung damage and eye damage.

2) Ground vehicles are not particularly fond of that glass either. They're not as vulnerable as a human being or a plane, but if you don't change your air and oil filters enough, those vehicles could come to a (literally) grinding halt. Fun not only for the troops using the vehicles, but for the supply guys.

3) Krakatoa's making noises like it might erupt again -- it might be fun to have it go off during an Indonesian campaign.

4) And then, just for S&G, there are always earthquakes and tsunamis!

Webstral
04-15-2010, 02:20 PM
HQ, I like your thinking. The US and the UK could find themselves in a real pickle regarding a confrontation between Indonesia and ANZET (Australia, New Zealand, and East Timor). I like the idea of bringing in China. Perhaps, political machinations being what they are, the US/UK can be kept on the sidelines because tyhe belief that a localized conflict between strictly regional players is preferable to a more generalized conflict. Perhaps the stage could be set with the emergence of a more militant government in Indonesia. This government might make a deal with China for some sort of exclusivity regarding access to Indonesian oil and whatever oil comes out of the East Timor "situation". China, interested in having more oil and interested in flexing her muscles a bit, agrees to back Indonesia with material support and diplomatic support.

Some sort of maskirovka has to be generated to create a casus belli in East Timor. Once the shooting starts, Indonesia makes a bid to keep US/UK forces out of the fight by having China delcare the war a local confrontation not involving the great powers. Behind the scenes, China rattles the coin box fat with US Treasury notes.

Of course, Australia has strong ties to the Chinese economy, too. I'm not sure how to play that one out. Maybe China plays both sides here. China doesn't interfere with ANZ support for East Timor so she can watch how the war unfolds, and also to give her client a chance to beat some Westerners. Once things go a certain distance, of course, China intends to step in and call for peace on terms favorable to her client. There's a complex political dance needed to enable ANZET to carry the story by fighting Indonesia without having the great powers get involved. Hm.

Webstral

RN7
04-15-2010, 10:14 PM
Has anyone ever heard of the book by Eric Willmot called 'Below the Line'? Its basically a story about an Indonesian invasion of Australia which succeeds in annexing all of Australia north of a line from Brisbane to Carnarvon in Western Australia. The term 'South Irian' is used by Indonesians to describe Australia, and I believe it has also been used in real life by Indonesian nationalists to make Australian's a bit jumpy.

On a more realistic note the Indonesians couldn't pull it off. The distances and logistics are way beyond Indonesian capabilities, although they could probably land some soldiers along Australia's vast coastline who could cause some trouble. Unless the Australian or Western intelligence community is asleep for a few months they are bound to notice any build up of Indonesian forces on a scale that would be needed to invade Australia. Naval and air transports would be easily tracked and fairly easily picked off by better equipped and trained Australian naval and air forces. Any heavy ground units that Indonesia could concievably land woud be easy meat for the Australian army and RAAF, and even if the Aussies don't get them the outback would.

Australia also has too many allies that woud help. Even if America remained neutral, which is highly unlikely, Britain, New Zealand and Canada would send forces and aid, as might many other countries even in Asia. Indonesia would need the help of another major power to even contemplate an invasion. Although China automatically springs to mind, the Chinese and Indonesians don't like each other that much. There has been a lot of political and racially motivated anti-Chinese discrimination in both Indonesia and Malaysia during the 20th Century, much of it very voilent. Singapore which has a majority ethnic Chinese population became an independent country largely over the mutual mistrust and animosty that exists between the Chinese and locals in these countries. Also Australia is probably a lot more importantant to the Chinese economy that Indonesia, as a sizeable portion of China's raw material and agricultural imports come from Australia.

Jason Weiser
04-16-2010, 01:26 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomorrow_series

Also not bad, some big holes (such as the US not intervening...fat chance), but they didn't specifically name the enemy...I took it to be the Indonesians.

Targan
04-16-2010, 11:17 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomorrow_series

Also not bad, some big holes (such as the US not intervening...fat chance), but they didn't specifically name the enemy...I took it to be the Indonesians.

Great link Jason! And the best part... this at the end of the Wikipedia article:

"In June 2009, Screen Australia announced that it would fund the development of the feature film Tomorrow, When the War Began, written and directed by screenwriter Stuart Beattie (Australia, Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl), and produced by Andrew Mason for Ambience Entertainment, reportedly to begin production in late 2009. Raymond Terrace in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, was chosen as a major location for producing the film. The film is expected to show in cinemas in September 2, 2010."

An Aussie version of Red Dawn! Ripper!

Webstral
04-16-2010, 11:43 PM
I want to be clear that I am not talking about an invasion of Australia by Indonesia. I'm talking about an invasion of East Timor by Indonesia.

Webstral

Targan
04-17-2010, 12:03 AM
How about an invasion of Papua New Guinea by Indonesia? That would be very much worth their while. PNG has huge amounts of untapped resources.

Webstral
04-17-2010, 01:33 AM
How about an invasion of Papua New Guinea by Indonesia? That would be very much worth their while. PNG has huge amounts of untapped resources.

Another interesting prospect. With the aid of a good deception plan, the Indonesians might stockpile weapons and supplies on their half of the island. The tail-end of the plan might be the transport of a goodly number of troops to the island just before the offensive kicks off. Lots of details to be sorted there. Once the fighting on the ground began, both sides would fight an air/sea battle to keep their own supply lines open while interdicting the enemy's supply lines.

Webstral

boogiedowndonovan
04-22-2010, 03:40 PM
good points by SSC and RN7

I did not know that Indonesia made claim to Australia or Indonesia's bad feelings regarding past colonialism. but hey, I'm just an average American. :)

I seem to recall Ballistix' site mentioning that significant parts of the Pakistani Navy sailed to Indonesia after India defeated Pakistan. If I ever find the url and if webarchive can find it, I'll post what he had.

As far as Chinese involvement on the side of Indonesia. I don't have that in my T2k world. They'd be a little busy getting whomped by the Soviets. Like RN7 said, there's been some major discrimination by Indonesia against their minority Chinese population. There was a major anti Chinese riot in 1997 I believe.

paraphrasing but canon T2k V2.0 and 2.2 does mention Australia and Indonesia engaging in aeronaval battles over Papua New Guinea. I can't recall the outcome, I think it says that both sides exhaust themselves, but someone with access to the books can fill it in. Or you could go the Merc 2000 route and have Australia defeating and occupying all of Indonesia.

kato13
04-22-2010, 03:53 PM
paraphrasing but canon T2k V2.0 and 2.2 does mention Australia and Indonesia engaging in aeronaval battles over Papua New Guinea. I can't recall the outcome, I think it says that both sides exhaust themselves, but someone with access to the books can fill it in.

Pretty good if from memory

Australia was largely untouched by the nuclear exchange, but the global panic which followed left its mark on both the cities and outback. Large parts of the countryside are now in anarchy, terrorized, or insular, but the major cities are organized and controlled by the central government. A short war was fought with Indonesia after it invaded Australia's ally, Papua New Guinea. The Indonesian offensive quickly halted, mostly due to logistical collapse, but not before a majority of Australia's and Indonesia's modern aircraft and naval vessels had been damaged or destroyed in a series of running aeronaval actions.

boogiedowndonovan
04-22-2010, 07:25 PM
Pretty good if from memory

thanks! yeah, I hate to say it, I remember useless stuff and forget important things.

I dug through some of my old emails and found the link to Damian Robinson's T2k Indonesia-Australia site. (link was actually in an email from the etranger yahoo group)

http://web.archive.org/web/20021022022839/www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/4808/Twilight/T2KAust.html

He's also got a transcript of the incident where someone on the old WebRPG board thought Loren was female.

http://web.archive.org/web/20021022043440/www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/4808/Twilight/loren_who.html

Mohoender
04-24-2010, 01:46 AM
I don't think it takes a great leap of imagination to envisage a day where world conditions have deteriorated, rising sea levels eat away more and more of Indonesia's land mass, the military regain some of the power they have lost in the past 15 years and a more militant or (heaven forbid) radical Islamist government takes power. Right now Australia has powerful friends that would tend to scare off any conceivable military threat to Australia but that might not last forever. One of my big regrets is that if Australia and Indonesia ever enter into a serious stoush I'll be too old to do my part for my country in the manner my warrior spirit would want me to. I'll just have to find a sneakier way to have a go at the enemy.


Hello Targ, just to refocus on your initial question.:D

I like your idea but I don't see the rising sea level to be the trigger. If a good chunk of Indonesia gets underwater, that would probably be the case for Australia as well. However, some other catastrophy (multiple earthquake and repeated tsunamis, for exemple), could make people's life miserable. Then, that combined (as you say) with some radical leadership can drive people out. Australia would be a very tempting target.

Develop it, I would like to see more.