View Full Version : Defensive weapons
kcdusk
10-08-2008, 03:39 AM
Most people think of weapons as being "offensive".
What sort of weapons or equipment could be considered defensive?
I guess some examples i can think of are flash/bang grenades used to disorientate the enemy to buy yourself time.
Caltrops, used to slow or stop an enemy on foot or to burst car tyres.
Can anyone think or list of any others?
kato13
10-08-2008, 03:55 AM
Mines
Mohoender
10-08-2008, 04:03 AM
I would say air defense systems. Some can be used in an offensive role but their main purpose remain to defend an area.
Elsewhere, I might be burnt for that but mines (at least regular ground mines) are defensive as well. I can't think of someone throwing a mine at a tank :p . The one dropped by planes today are, however, truly offensive especially when they are launched on civilians.
Then, every type of gear that is not truly a weapon : helmets, bodyarmors, and most electronic systems. Radars were first used in a strictly defensive role and Asdic was designed for naval defense.
Interceptor planes is another type. Fighter planes are often used in an attack role but interceptors were made strictly to stop incoming ennemy aircrafts. They are becoming increasingly rare, however.
Tear gas but you might have said it.
Any weapon of course, depending on what end of it you are but that is the obvious:D .
Mohoender
10-08-2008, 04:04 AM
Mines
:D :D :D :D
kcdusk
10-08-2008, 04:18 AM
I'll pay mines, body armour and radar.
how about smoke grenades, or vehiclar smoke.
General Pain
10-08-2008, 04:19 AM
Mines
that was my first thought aswell : Claymore mines ;)
kcdusk
10-08-2008, 04:47 AM
Barbed wire.
And nets, as a form of non-lethal traps.
kato13
10-08-2008, 05:00 AM
If you are including barb wire there are a bunch of passive sensors you should include as well.
the REMBASS system is interesting
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/rembass.htm
button bomblets (noise makers) and trip flares might also make sense.
Targan
10-08-2008, 05:35 AM
Tank traps, anti tank ditches, sharpened stakes, caltrops. All low tech and very 'do-able' by people with hand tools but potentially very effective.
Diamond_Spear
10-08-2008, 08:19 AM
Can we include handguns? To paraphrase what a veteran once told me :If you need a pistol you should already have leftâ€.
pmulcahy11b
10-08-2008, 09:25 AM
Technically, fragmentation grenades are "Defensive Hand Grenades..."
Technically, fragmentation grenades are "Defensive Hand Grenades..."
This post makes me remember that in the Spanish army, the R-41 (the standard hand grenade) has a different configuration depending if you use it in a defensive or offensive role. Basically the defensive grenade is an offensive grenade inside an special envelope that contains 3500 small steel balls to increase the damage in the burst area. The idea of the increased frag. power is that the soldier who uses a defensive grenade is throwing it from a cover. It is thought that the offensive configuration of the R-41 is better to prevent damage against the rest of the squad, immediately advancing to take profit from the grenade effect.
No idea if in others armies this difference between defensive/offensive grenade types exists.
jester
10-08-2008, 11:15 AM
Weapons that are purely defensive, ARGH since most weapons can be used for either. Especialy if one is creative.
The flashbang example and how it is explained allow it to be used as a defensive weapon for the purpose of distraction. HOWEVER, as they are primarly used they are used in an OFFENSIVE ROLE, they are used by pole and raid units in distracting while a building or similiar operation is occuirng, ie being taken down.
A machinegun mounted on a tripod and in a fixed position is ususaly a defensive weapon, however the same schem as it delivers supporting fire to an infantry advance on an enemy position it is now an offensive weapon.
The improvised weapons mentioned, a Helmet, or an entrenching tool or a tent pin. Are they a defensive weapon when used to bash someone, or stab or hack? Not really. They are offensive weapon, to use them as a defense weapon they loose ALOT of their effectiveness, surprise is what will help you win if you have to use such equipment as a weapon.
Mines for the most part are defensive, although they did teach how to use them to ambush vehicles or personel, the old trick of tying a line to an anti tank mine and pulling it under the track of a tank.
I digress.
Pistols for the most part are now more or less a last ditch weapon and thus can be used and are used for defensive purposes. Very few people have the skill or need to use one as an offensive weapon. However, I can see it being an offensive weapon in trench clearing, urban, tunnels and ship operations where it is close quarters. However, today there are alot more weapons that will fill the role much better.
Carbines USED TO BE defensive weapons for drivers, clerk and artillerymen. Now they are almost standard issue because of their size, portability and ease of use in close quarters and in modern methods of deployment via inside a mech vehicle or helicopter.
Today as I mentioned a few days ago, Submachineguns are now being issued as a means of personal defense to personel who would in the past be issued a pistol. Although again for a close quarters raid operation, they would be a good choice and used as an offensive weapon.
Claymores, yes mines, but they are so much more and I love them :) Used for strengthening perimeters and thwarting an enemy attack. but, also a cool thing to have if you are setting up an ambush.
I agree, most air DEFENSE systems are exactly defensive, almost exclusivly so unless of course you turn the system on infantry, but its primary purpose defense.
I would say, something like a mini gun in a fixed fortification would be a defensive weapon as well. And a very cool one.
Trip Flares are defensive.
Most of the time Knives because that means you are without a working firearm or ammo and things are now desperate. <The bayonet goes both ways, but traditionaly a bayonet is an offensive weapon ie the bayonet charge>
Mo, I like the idea that interceptor aircraft are defensive and it is, but to do the defensive role they must be offensive, since their purpose is to ATTACK incomming bombers. At the Macro level they are defensive, but at the micro level they are offensive.
Just like bomber aircraft, they are purely offensive.
This is actualy harder than I imagined it would be when I first opened this string.
I'll just make a list:
Pistols
Knives
Shotguns usualy
Some grenades
Mines mostly
Carbines and Submachineguns as they are generaly issued today
Air Defense Systems
Machinguns and heavy weapons when dug in in a fixed position
Obstacles <wire, tank traps, ditches, punji sticks etc>
headquarters
10-08-2008, 02:08 PM
Can we include handguns? To paraphrase what a veteran once told me :If you need a pistol you should already have leftâ€.
hehe good one
headquarters
10-08-2008, 03:06 PM
Technically, fragmentation grenades are "Defensive Hand Grenades..."
its the one swith out shrapnel that are for offensive uses..
headquarters
10-08-2008, 03:09 PM
This post makes me remember that in the Spanish army, the R-41 (the standard hand grenade) has a different configuration depending if you use it in a defensive or offensive role. Basically the defensive grenade is an offensive grenade inside an special envelope that contains 3500 small steel balls to increase the damage in the burst area. The idea of the increased frag. power is that the soldier who uses a defensive grenade is throwing it from a cover. It is thought that the offensive configuration of the R-41 is better to prevent damage against the rest of the squad, immediately advancing to take profit from the grenade effect.
No idea if in others armies this difference between defensive/offensive grenade types exists.
We trained for assault using concussion grenades and defence using frags in the Norwegian Army in the 1990s..The frags were german made plastic ones with thousands of little steel balls in them - the concussion ones were more like a smokegrenade type only they gave little smoke but quite the walloping bang ..
headquarters
10-08-2008, 03:14 PM
Altough once used to gas people in positions you were about to attack -I seem to remember that modern use of these weapons also play on the defence ,meaning that gas and chemical agents can be used to deny an enemy use of a certain piece of terrain ,since its temporarily toxic /poisonous ..The same gas/aerosol weapon could of course be used to attack someone ,but it would slow you down some if you had to move through country were everything was potentially /actually covered in a fine spray of nervegas droplets or some such.
jester
10-08-2008, 03:26 PM
Yes, gas is an offensive weapon but can be used as a denial weapon as well. Especialy something like CS since its base is a crystline chemical that is persistant. So toss in a CS grenade in the bunker and yes it will disapate, but it will still affect you for sometime, weeks and months later depending on the weather conditions and how it breaks down.
copeab
10-08-2008, 03:44 PM
Guard dogs. Ducks. Geese.
(animals as alarms)
Brandon
chico20854
10-08-2008, 04:34 PM
AT missiles! Not exactly the sort of thing you want to be dragging with you when you go over the top.
And to second Jester's statement, tripod-mounted GPMGs. Interlocking fields of fire make defensive positions oh-so-much fun!
jester
10-08-2008, 05:18 PM
I was thinking of adding anti tank weapons as defensive as they tend to be used more for that purpose than offensive. But, then again, if one wants to ambush an enemy vehicle column well antitank rockets of missiles do work wonders. a narrow aproach a bridge, mountain pass or sunken road, take out the first and last vehicle and everything in between can be destroyed at your leasure or captured intact as they are now trapped and can't manuver or fire really.
And, think of the SMAW, an antitank weapon and its nickname, "BUNKER BUSTER!" So, I can see it being hauled with you as you go over the top, to be used to take out those pesky enemy machinegun emplacements.
I also recall the British in the Falklands using the Javalins to take out the Argentinians bunkers.
Again, the things we don't think of as defensive turn out to be. However, a simple rule,
If it is dug in and has a tripod or stand or mount that is being used it is a defensive weapon.
And here we go, a weapon with a mounted tripod has a longer range and more stable platform.
The same weapons in the assault mode, tend to be hand fired or from a bipod and thus have less range and accuracy.
And now I am thinking mortars too.
Set on its bipod unless it is giving support fire then it is in a fixed posiiton and will most likely fire in a defensive mode. Like that scene in Green Berets where Mr. Beckworth gets to be part of the war.
And then the 60mm mortar fired in the handheld mode, no bipod and fired with its trigger while the gunner is holding it.
Now, we have the fine line between cover or supportive fire and defensive fire.
TiggerCCW UK
10-08-2008, 06:34 PM
Jester, it was Milans, not Javelins, but you are exactly right. One of the instructors I worked with years ago was a Falklands veteran, who told a story about them using Milans to pop bunkers, and then his Troop commander got pulled up when they got back for using too many expensive missiles!
jester
10-08-2008, 06:58 PM
Lovely! Missiles are more important than men, ya gotta love the budget minded commanders in the rear.
TiggerCCW UK
10-08-2008, 07:22 PM
IIRC He was bollocked for 'being excessively profligate with resources'. Words to that effect anyway. Really endeared the brass to the men!
jester
10-08-2008, 07:27 PM
It never ceases to amaze me. A missile costs depending on the ordinance used anywhere from 10k to 1 million.
But, how much does it costs to recruit, train, pay and then burry a soldier, give his widow/mother his indemnity, then recruit and retrain his replacement?
Speaking purely financialy it is a better deal to use a piece of hardware still. But, alas, the brass doesn't think ahead.
headquarters
10-09-2008, 01:55 AM
It never ceases to amaze me. A missile costs depending on the ordinance used anywhere from 10k to 1 million.
But, how much does it costs to recruit, train, pay and then burry a soldier, give his widow/mother his indemnity, then recruit and retrain his replacement?
Speaking purely financialy it is a better deal to use a piece of hardware still. But, alas, the brass doesn't think ahead.
probably less than one million it would seem
kato13
10-09-2008, 02:09 AM
Reminds me of the fact that during peak production RPG-16 rounds were manufactured for the equivalent of something like 75 cents (US).
"Quantity has a quality all its own" - Joseph Stalin
headquarters
10-09-2008, 02:41 AM
Reminds me of the fact that during peak production RPG-16 rounds were manufactured for the equivalent of something like 75 cents (US).
"Quantity has a quality all its own" - Joseph Stalin
wow!!
how many millions did they make?
kato13
10-09-2008, 02:46 AM
I don't have solid numbers on how many they made but on the current international market they go for about 14 dollars. I was reading about a firing range in Lebanon where you can shoot them off for 25 dollars a shot.
kcdusk
10-09-2008, 03:01 AM
Its 99% of accountants that give the rest of us a bad name.
jester
10-09-2008, 06:33 AM
Reminds me of the fact that during peak production RPG-16 rounds were manufactured for the equivalent of something like 75 cents (US).
"Quantity has a quality all its own" - Joseph Stalin
Well, that is also the result of a comand economy, where everyone works for a set wage determined by the state. And what was the going wage of the worker at the time? I wonder how much Chinese made ones actualy cost to make? Probably pretty close to that figure I would imagine since Norinco uses convict slave labor they really are just paying for the raw materials and transport costs, again all state owned/controlled/run so that is at a reduced rate or technicaly no cost. Shipping overseas and marketing could be the major cost.
Nowhere Man 1966
10-09-2008, 08:06 PM
Can we include handguns? To paraphrase what a veteran once told me :If you need a pistol you should already have leftâ€.
I pretty much would see handguns, in a military situation, in that light. They are good backup in case if your rifle/shotgun jams, runs put of ammo or if you lose it.
Chuck M.
bigehauser
10-10-2008, 04:02 AM
Adding a caveat, as many of we Soldiers would say, I would like to talk about using a structure or building itself as a defensive weapon, or perhaps redoubt.
Entrance ways, to include doors, large windows, and combat damage large enough to give entry, interior objects such as bed frames, book shelves, or other large objects filled with ballast like dirt or similar material to add that much more weight, are placed behind these areas. However, careful pains need to be made so that the defenders can not only get out, but get out very quickly if they are about to be overran.
For multiple storied buildings, secondary walls, whether dry wall or other can be taken down and placed over stairs to deny offensive movement from story to story. Furthermore, nails or similar objects can be stuck into the boards, as well as other means of disallowing enemies to get up or down stairs(think the Home Alone series).
Claymores can be placed in outward fans in partially or fully destroyed rooms with either detonators elsewhere, or trip wire set up to provide an alarm that can deny the enemy the element of surprise.
Hallways can be lengthened in terms of fields of fire by taking out non load bearing walls to make a long lane of fire within the building. Murder Holes can be placed in crawl spaces, and along walls. Holes can be cut into floors that have hollow spaces below, and concealed with throw rugs, garbage, or debris like tacked down news paper.
Trip wire at random intervals. Mouse trapped shotgun shells at random intervals.
I can think of plenty of other things, but this shall suffice I hope.
-Hauser
jester
10-10-2008, 10:44 AM
Hauser makes a good point. Defesnive weapons is terrain, as well.
So use what is arround you. Like I mentioned in my reply to defending the town in the tactical situation.
Clear fields of fire first.
Minor obstacles that will hinder advancement but, not allow for cover. Imagine having to run over ground covered with bits of cinderblock sized rubble, a tripping hazard, forcing you to change your focus from the enemy to the ground so you don't trip or run into one, put your foot down wrong and trip and fall, or even break a leg or ankle.
Small rail fences can be a problem, it forces the enemy to vault over them, making them a target, but they can be easily shot through too.
Small trenches even, eight to six inches deep and about 1 meter apart, these would make running impossible, again adding to the tripping problem but they wouldn't be deep enough to provide cover.
Other things, try a Blackberry bramble, its a natural barbed wire that is near impassable by infantry and some vehicles. Add poison ivy, it may deter someone or make them pause before assaulting through it.
And in the trenches like I mentioned before, use them for irrigation or even sewage, and toss in broken glass or punji stakes.
another defensive item, a pice of com wire or even better wire from a wireguided missile, its strong, fine and thin. And if you run into one it is something you won't forget. If running into it it will stop you, in some cases knock you down, or cut you. Have come wire just below knee height, the thin wire at neck and face height, so if someone running full bore hit them they will either trip, or get a nice garrote slice to the face, not fatal but it will do them an injury and give them pause.
Also, as Hauser said, filling furniture like bookshelves. Well anyone ever move an bookshelf and it fell? Rig them as deadfalls, as well as specific walls, sections of building, telephone poles and trees, or even rig trap doors in the building, say the front room, that the the enemy will come through, you have cleared the walls etc, so you are firing from the kitchen, enemy storms through the front room, as they cross either they fall into the crawl space about knee deep, or into the basement, or from the second floor to the first. Or even just weaken the floow leaving only enough to allow it to hold itself up.
Other defensive ideas, flood a trench or a feild, it will make it suicidal for most vehicles to cross, as well as men on foot bogging them down and making them advance at a snails pace.
And again you can put stakes and glass as an area denial weapon, especialy somewhere flooded or that has been turned to mud, the enemy wants to low crawl then they have to worry about being punctured or shredded.
Rainbow Six
10-10-2008, 12:25 PM
Back in the day Loonz's site made mention to villages sticking up big signs saying "Danger - stay away, bubonic plague" or words to that effect.
That strikes me as a fairly effective defensive weapon...
jester
10-10-2008, 01:07 PM
Back in the day Loonz's site made mention to villages sticking up big signs saying "Danger - stay away, bubonic plague" or words to that effect.
That strikes me as a fairly effective defensive weapon...
It would, other signs, "Radioactive" or "Chemical Weapons" signs as well.
And they are really pretty cheap, a board, a stick and some paint. And its all so passive too.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.