View Full Version : Dust off your books, Russia's going full-USSR rewind.
raketenjagdpanzer
03-01-2014, 04:17 PM
I wasn't aware until recently, but they've pretty much bullied the former USSR republics back in to line. Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus...of course Georgia and now Ukraine are about to feel the deep tissue massage of an ill-made yet entirely effective Soviet* hobnail on their necks.
...
*=like all things Russian it's surplus they've kept in storage for just such an occasion. Please to be ignoring hammer-and-sickle logo on sole, Tovarisch.
stormlion1
03-01-2014, 04:35 PM
The Russians have that going for them, they have tons of equipment stocked away for a rainy day. It might be covered in packing grease or rust considering who stockpiled it away, but they got it. It just takes so much extra vodka to convince the troops to clean the rust up though.
I remember reading a report years back about a warehouse full of artillery pieces from the Second World War that had been in storage in the nowheresville of Siberia. I wonder how much there really is.
Schone23666
03-01-2014, 05:39 PM
Now, feel the BOOT-HEEL OF MOTHER RUSSIA! MUWAHAHAHHAHA! :p
But in all seriousness...well, seems Russia's heading back to the old days once again. Not that this is surprising or anything.
raketenjagdpanzer
03-01-2014, 05:56 PM
The Russians have that going for them, they have tons of equipment stocked away for a rainy day. It might be covered in packing grease or rust considering who stockpiled it away, but they got it. It just takes so much extra vodka to convince the troops to clean the rust up though.
I remember reading a report years back about a warehouse full of artillery pieces from the Second World War that had been in storage in the nowheresville of Siberia. I wonder how much there really is.
I've heard likewise about aircraft going all the way back to the MiG-15. Who knows.
Of course, one might argue that by the time they're reduced to flying MiG-15s it "won't matter" but if everything else on either side is atritted, then a MiG-15 is as good as an F22 as far as having something in the air goes.
WallShadow
03-01-2014, 08:56 PM
...Of course, one might argue that by the time they're reduced to flying MiG-15s it "won't matter" but if everything else on either side is atritted, then a MiG-15 is as good as an F22 as far as having something in the air goes.
If the MiG has vacuum-tube technology that's survived numerous EMP-blasts, it's probably better than the F-22.
stormlion1
03-02-2014, 01:39 AM
Comes down to how there stored. Russians are good for storing some gear but I've seen pictures of an airplane storage yard and it was covered in weeds higher than the planes were and a Tank Storage Depot where the paint had come off from the weather. Maybe there salvageable? I don't know. But they still have crates full of boots, uniforms, rifles, submachine guns, landmines, and other assorted weapons and stocks that will probably last forever. The question is will they need it? The Russian Military isn't the sad excuse it was a few years back. Putin if nothing else put them back on there feet and gave them there pride again.
pmulcahy11b
03-02-2014, 03:16 AM
We (Meaning the US) can't intervene in Ukraine. That would put us head-to-head with the Russians, and that is fraught with danger that could conceivably lead down the path to WWIII. Real-life T2K scenario, anyone?
What we need to do is let our NATO allies deal with it. They do have the troops and firepower, as much as they would like everyone to believe they don't. It's time for the Europeans to stop being pussies.
Targan
03-02-2014, 05:02 AM
We (Meaning the US) can't intervene in Ukraine. That would put us head-to-head with the Russians, and that is fraught with danger that could conceivably lead down the path to WWIII. Real-life T2K scenario, anyone?
What we need to do is let our NATO allies deal with it. They do have the troops and firepower, as much as they would like everyone to believe they don't. It's time for the Europeans to stop being pussies.
But which NATO allies? Which ones have the kind of heavy armoured formations that would be required to stop Russia right on Russia's doorstep? Germany? Imagine that. Talk about letting the genie out of the bottle. I guess what I'm saying is, putting militaries like Germany's head-to-head with the Russians comes with some pretty serious historical baggage too.
StainlessSteelCynic
03-02-2014, 05:34 AM
Overheard late last night at the passport check at an airport in Eastern Europe...
Name?
-Matvey Romanovich Naumov.
Nationality?
-Russian.
Occupation?
-No no, we're just visiting.
stormlion1
03-02-2014, 12:07 PM
I don't even think the US has tanks in Germany anymore. They were pulled out last year in April. So if it did come down to Armor Formations it will be the Germans and the French gear that would be the first to arrive and be used. Maybe followed up by what we have in the Middle East and the Brits sending gear through the Chunnel. It can handle armor on flatcars right?
raketenjagdpanzer
03-02-2014, 03:05 PM
This is what we've waited for,
this is it boys, this is war,
the President is on the line -
raketenjagdpanzer
03-02-2014, 03:06 PM
I don't even think the US has tanks in Germany anymore. They were pulled out last year in April. So if it did come down to Armor Formations it will be the Germans and the French gear that would be the first to arrive and be used. Maybe followed up by what we have in the Middle East and the Brits sending gear through the Chunnel. It can handle armor on flatcars right?
We moved our heavy armor to Poland when we relocated our commands there, I thought. Or were they all just brought home?
Anyway, it's irrelevant. Russia is going to curbstomp Ukraine, the end.
stormlion1
03-02-2014, 03:13 PM
The tanks that were in Germany got moved to South Carolina. If we have armor in Poland I would be surprised, mostly because I don't think we have any bases there. And yes, the Ruskies are back and the Ukraine is going get its ass handed to it.
mikeo80
03-02-2014, 05:55 PM
So, is it time to raise the drawbridge, unleash the moat monsters, and put the archers on the wall?
My $0.02
Mike
Raellus
03-02-2014, 06:09 PM
A 99 Luftballons reference? Nice, although I prefer it in its original German. ;)
Raellus
03-02-2014, 06:14 PM
Not only am I dusting off the old books, I picked this new one up prior to the Sochi Olympics.
http://www.amazon.com/Russian-Security-Paramilitary-Forces-since/dp/1780961057/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1393805625&sr=8-1&keywords=russian+security+and+paramilitary+forces+ since+1991
At that time, I didn't quite foresee the current situation in the Ukraine.
Cdnwolf
03-02-2014, 06:29 PM
The Ukrainian Armed Forces still have some firepower...
Ukrainian Ground Forces is located in Ukraine
Land Forces Command Western Operational Command, (former Soviet Carpathian Military District)
Southern Operational Command, Odessa (former Soviet Odessa Military District)
Territorial Directorate "North", Chernihiv
79th Airmobile Brigade
19th Rocket Brigade
6th Army Corps, Dnipropetrovsk (Units based in the area of the Southern Operational Command)
17th Tank Brigade, Kryvyi Rih
25th Airborne Brigade, Cherkaske
28th Guards Mechanised Brigade, Chornomorske
92nd Guards Mechanised Brigade, Chuhuiv
93rd Guards Mechanised Brigade, Cherkaske
55th Artillery Brigade
Corps Units
8th Army Corps, Zhytomyr (Units based in the area of the Territorial Directorate "North")
1st Tank Brigade, Honcharivske
30th Mechanized Brigade, Novohrad-Volynskyi
72nd Mechanized Brigade, Bila Tserkva
95th Airmobile Brigade, Zhytomyr
26th Artillery Brigade, Berdychiv
3rd Army Aviation Regiment, Brody
Corps Units
13th Army Corps, Rivne (former Soviet 13th Army) (Units based in the area of the Western Operational Command)
24th Mechanized Brigade, Yavoriv
51st Mechanized Brigade, Volodymyr-Volynskyi
128th Guards Mechanized Brigade, Mukacheve
11th Artillery Brigade, Ternopil
7th Army Aviation Regiment, Novyi Kalyniv
Military University, Lviv
Hetman Petro Sahaidachny Land Forces Academy
Military Academy, Odessa
57,000 Personnel (+ 6,100 in air-mobile forces)
686 Tanks (+ 41 in Navy)
2,065 (+ 310 in air-mobile forces and 160 in Navy) Armoured Combat Vehicles
72 Combat Helicopters
716 (+ 47 in Navy) Artillery Systems
pmulcahy11b
03-02-2014, 06:42 PM
Just some clarity I left out inadvertently: The pussies I'm referring to is NOT the European troops. They are rock hard. The pussies I refer to is the various European governments.
mikeo80
03-02-2014, 07:07 PM
A 99 Luftballons reference? Nice, although I prefer it in its original German. ;)
Sorry, I do not follow you, Raellus. 99 Luftballons?
As far as the Ukraine, It is going pretty much as we said it will. Every one is pointing at Mr. Putin and saying, "You are a VERY BAD BOY." And in reality, there is not a whole heck of a lot that anyone can do about the Crimea. I hope to HELL that the Prez is not contemplating "boots on the ground". That would cause so many problems, many of which we have stated here and in other posts. Especially since the first "boots" would be the troops here at Fort Bragg.
My $0.02
Mike
kato13
03-02-2014, 07:24 PM
Sorry, I do not follow you, Raellus. 99 Luftballons?
refers to this post
This is what we've waited for,
this is it boys, this is war,
the President is on the line -
99 Luftballons
Pretty much the anthem of the cold war. At least in the 80s.
English
14IRDDnEPR4
German
Lur-SGl3uw8
In addition to being a great song I learned that the German phrase for "Captain Kirk" is "Captain Kirk" ;)
Targan
03-03-2014, 05:26 AM
I can't imagine Putin to be a passionate, volatile sort of personality. I think he's probably more the very controlled, ruthless type. Just imagine the confidence that Putin and his allies and his military commanders must have, to have calculated that even if they go in hard, flooding Crimea with troops, encircling Ukranian military bases and just annexing the whole damn thing, nobody's going to do a thing about it. Even the Ukrainian military, I mean what can they do? The Russians have absolutely supreme air superiority, they already have the entire Black Sea Fleet right there, the Russian Army is pouring in at the moment. It's done. A fait accompli. An absolute masterclass in realpolitik.
Rapparee
03-03-2014, 05:56 AM
The Ukrainians called up their reserves right? Wonder how many they can actually arm.
Feel bad for the remnants of their military still trapped on the Crimea. There was a contingent of Ukrainian marines stuck there at least and they'd refused demands to disarm. Theres some tense stand-offs between Russian forces and holdouts.
Olefin
03-03-2014, 03:09 PM
going to be a very interesting war - mainly because the Ukraine, if it really gets down and dirty, has the ultimate dirty bomb as I have stated before - and I really dont think that Putin wants to see eastern Russia and Belorussia basically get depopulated
hmm now where did I put that book about the mad Russian general in Lvov and his SCUD?
Raellus
03-03-2014, 06:13 PM
The news has been saying that the images of Russian troops we keep seeing are from the Russian Black Sea bases. Does this mean that they're Naval Infantry? I haven't noticed any distinctive blue and white striped undershirts (also worn by Russian paratroopers and some special forces) and all the photos I've seen show sanitized uniforms with no visible insignia of any kind so I have no way of figuring it out.
Crimea is Russia's for the taking. Short of comprehensive economic sanctions, freezing of Russian assets abroad, and a full embargo on Russian goods, there's really nothing the rest of the world can do to stop them. I don't see this happening.
As for the rest of Ukraine, I don't think the Russians are going to invade and I doubt we'll see full-scale war. I can see, however, a brief Russian invasion/occupation of East Ukraine so that that territory can be used as a bargaining chip to win annexation of Crimea (i.e. we'll pull out of E.K. if you recognize our annexation of Crimea). If would also afford the Russians an opportunity to whittle down the Ukrainian military a bit. That said, I don't think Putin will go that far. Still, I don't see NATO or anyone else doing anything militarily to stop him. The only way this is going to turn into a proto-WWIII is if a full NATO member like Poland or the Baltic states is attacked and Putin would be mad to do that. I think he's far too canny for that sort of brinksmanship.
stormlion1
03-03-2014, 07:08 PM
The troops were seeing have every insignia removed from those uniforms and even have there faces covered in most pics I've seen. Makes them look like mooks from a video game. I'm guessing this is to keep people guessing who they are or what units there from so as far as anyone can tell there Russian Specops or Naval Infantry or even troops pulled from boot camp.
Interesting thing is reports of four Russian Warships demanding two Ukrainian Warships stand down and be boarded. There keeping them bottled up in harbor.
Nowhere Man 1966
03-03-2014, 08:46 PM
If the MiG has vacuum-tube technology that's survived numerous EMP-blasts, it's probably better than the F-22.
Heck, given the right circumstances, the F-22 might lose to the MiG-15 in a dogfight.
Chuck
Targan
03-03-2014, 09:03 PM
Heck, given the right circumstances, the F-22 might lose to the MiG-15 in a dogfight.
Given the right circumstances an F-22 could be taken down by a goose.
Nowhere Man 1966
03-03-2014, 09:09 PM
Given the right circumstances an F-22 could be taken down by a goose.
LOL!!! Yeah, it can happen. ;)
Chuck
Trooper
03-04-2014, 02:33 AM
I'm guessing this is to keep people guessing who they are or what units there from so as far as anyone can tell there Russian Specops or Naval Infantry or even troops pulled from boot camp.
Russian VDV?
Crimea Invaded By High Readiness Forces Of The Russian Federation
Teksti: Arto Pulkki | Kuvat: Getty Images / EPA / Landov
According to Suomen Sotilas (Soldier of Finland) magazine's expert, the Crimean invasion was carried out by high readiness forces of the Russian Federation. The Russian media reported that the forces displaying no national or other insignia were pro-Russian volunteer militias defending Crimean autonomy.
During last weekend Western media was speculating to whom the troops actually belong.
Suomen Sotilas magazine's Arto Pulkki analyzed pictures taken from the so called volunteer militias.
Unknown soldiers - upper picture.
- New EMR camouflage combat uniforms used only by Russian Federation forces
- New 6sh112 tactical vest used only by Russian Federation forces
- New 6B27 composite helmet used only by Russian Federation forces
- New 7,62 mm PKP machine guns used only by Russian Federation forces
- Russian 5,45 mm AK74M assault rifles
As a conclusion it is evident that the troops in question are high readiness troops of the Russian Federation.
Unknonw soldiers - lower picture.
- 6B26 composite helmets used only by airborne troops of the Russian Federation
- Russian 5,45 mm AK74M assault rifles
Soldier on the left:
- New EMR-camouflage combat uniform used only by Russian Federation forces
- 6SH92-5 tactical vest used only by airborne troops of the Russian Federation
Soldier on the right:
- Russian special forces and mountain troops Gorka-3 combat uniform used only by Russian Federation forces
- Russian special forces Smersh AK/VOG tactical vest used only by Russian Federation forces
With a 99 % probability we argue that these troops are the 45th Guards Separate Reconnaissance Regiment of VDV (Russian: 45-й гвардейский отдельный разведывательный ордена Александра Невского полк ВДВ), Kubinka, Moscow.
http://www.suomensotilas.fi/en/artikkelit/crimea-invaded-high-readiness-forces-russian-federation
Panther Al
03-04-2014, 08:16 AM
For what its worth, we already are technically (The US that is) required by treaty to send in troops in support of the Ukraine.
Back when the old USSR broke up, they wound up with a lot of Nukes: In exchange for giving them up, we, along with 6 others - including Russia - agreed that should *anybodies* armed forces move in, the countries that signed on would come in and put a stop to it with all the force required.
kalos72
03-04-2014, 08:20 AM
But we wont... :(
kato13
03-04-2014, 08:25 AM
For what its worth, we already are technically (The US that is) required by treaty to send in troops in support of the Ukraine.
Back when the old USSR broke up, they wound up with a lot of Nukes: In exchange for giving them up, we, along with 6 others - including Russia - agreed that should *anybodies* armed forces move in, the countries that signed on would come in and put a stop to it with all the force required.
It was never submitted to nor ratified by the Senate so it is NOT a treaty the US is bound by. I was really surprised by that fact.
stormlion1
03-04-2014, 10:49 AM
If there is a treaty to aid the Ukraine isn't the other signers required to send aid? Sure the US may not have ratified it, but did the other signers? Because if they did sign and they don't send troops. Its just a piece of worthless paper.
If there is a treaty to aid the Ukraine isn't the other signers required to send aid? Sure the US may not have ratified it, but did the other signers? Because if they did sign and they don't send troops. Its just a piece of worthless paper.
Treaty or not no country in its right mind is going to send military forces into the middle of the Ukraine and confront the Russians.
kalos72
03-04-2014, 12:20 PM
As we tend to do...we promised something and dont follow through. And we wonder why the world is slowly turning against us. :(
Why make promises you KNOW you wont keep...
Nowhere Man 1966
03-04-2014, 09:40 PM
For what its worth, we already are technically (The US that is) required by treaty to send in troops in support of the Ukraine.
Back when the old USSR broke up, they wound up with a lot of Nukes: In exchange for giving them up, we, along with 6 others - including Russia - agreed that should *anybodies* armed forces move in, the countries that signed on would come in and put a stop to it with all the force required.
Good point, but I doubt we, or anyone will. Chuck's #2 Law: Treaties are made to be broken. Hate to be cynical but they don't work or otherwise thing change to where they are useless. I think it was a mistake for the Ukraine to give up their nukes.
Chuck
StainlessSteelCynic
03-05-2014, 12:55 AM
On a perhaps related note, a Russian "numbers" radio station had a change in its broadcasts at the end of February.
It's not particularly interesting to hear but as one of the comments on YouTube states, "The timing of this is unsettling".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyJsG3v6mks#t=12
More info on the station concerned, UVB-76
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.