PDA

View Full Version : A good vehicle for the Project-Japanese Load carrier


tsofian
03-13-2017, 09:20 AM
The Japanese GSDF has these load carriers which look to be the business

http://www.deviantart.com/art/Aoshima-1-72-JGSDF-Material-Carrier-Vehicles-668743626

http://miniafv.blogspot.com/2015/04/aoshima-172-jgsdf-material-carrier.html

mmartin798
03-13-2017, 03:07 PM
It's small, but could be useful. Found some specs on it at this Japanese website:

http://www15.tok2.com/home/lttom/military-powers_jgsdf/shisetsu/military-powers_shizai.htm

I made a PDF of the page translated to english via Google Translate and attached it here or those that don't want to go looking for themselves.

tsofian
03-18-2017, 04:34 PM
Thanks! That is very helpful.

ArmySGT.
03-26-2017, 04:18 PM
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/M558.JPG/1024px-M558.JPG

http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/eng/M578.html

tsofian
03-26-2017, 07:16 PM
But that doesn't have any cargo space, the Japanese vehicle has

ArmySGT.
03-26-2017, 10:51 PM
But that doesn't have any cargo space, the Japanese vehicle has

Trailer and everyone straps all there duffle bags and rucks to the outside.

This would have a Deuce or a XR311 accompanying it.

mmartin798
03-27-2017, 06:07 PM
Don't overlook the fact these vehicles are designed for completely different mission profiles. The JGSDF Material Transport is basically a light construction vehicle and the M578 is a light armored recovery vehicle. One set of stats illustrates how different these are: the Material Transport weighs about 2 tonne, has a max carry capacity of 3 tonne and the crane can lift 2 tonne. The M578 weighs in at 27 tonnes and its crane can lift 15 tonne. So put three fully loaded Material Transports on a pallet and one M578 can lift it all.

ArmySGT.
03-28-2017, 11:22 PM
http://www.military-today.com/trucks/m548.jpg

M548 Cargo carrier (http://www.military-today.com/trucks/m548.htm)

http://www.military-today.com/engineering/m105_deuce.jpg
M105 DEUCE (http://www.military-today.com/engineering/m105_deuce.htm)

http://www.military-today.com/engineering/see.jpg
SEE (http://www.military-today.com/engineering/see.htm)

http://www.military-today.com/trucks/cucv.jpg
CUCV (http://www.military-today.com/trucks/cucv.htm)

.45cultist
03-29-2017, 04:27 AM
Early Project vehicles might have included both the M715/ Jeep Gladiator pickup replaced by the CUCV. The CUCV shared componants with the Humvee. An idea I had was to have transport facilities hidden near truck stops. The "Flying M" Would have power plants and transmissions to convert the trucks at the stops as per the original 5 year plant to augment with surviving equipment.

ArmySGT.
03-29-2017, 01:14 PM
Early Project vehicles might have included both the M715/ Jeep Gladiator pickup replaced by the CUCV. The CUCV shared componants with the Humvee. An idea I had was to have transport facilities hidden near truck stops. The "Flying M" Would have power plants and transmissions to convert the trucks at the stops as per the original 5 year plant to augment with surviving equipment.

Just the diesel motors, the head light controls, and the blackout drive lamp. It's a 24volt system, but I think the commonality of parts there crosses over to several chassis.

mmartin798
03-29-2017, 06:42 PM
Early Project vehicles might have included both the M715/ Jeep Gladiator pickup replaced by the CUCV. The CUCV shared componants with the Humvee. An idea I had was to have transport facilities hidden near truck stops. The "Flying M" Would have power plants and transmissions to convert the trucks at the stops as per the original 5 year plant to augment with surviving equipment.

Had some down time and work and went looking. You will notice that the cockpit of the Flying M logo looks a bit like a "P".

ArmySGT.
04-08-2017, 12:04 AM
DEATHKart! (http://www.maxim.com/rides/speed-warhouse-deathkart-2014-4)

aka the Rule of Cool!