View Full Version : Remington 1740 - I want one!!
TiggerCCW UK
04-16-2009, 04:32 AM
Its the munchkin gun!!! Anyone fancy working out stats?
http://www.lesjones.com/2008/06/16/double-barrel-pump-shotgun-moe-szyslak-style/
http://amodestpublication.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/homebuilt-double-barrel-pump-action-shotgun/
Targan
04-16-2009, 04:55 AM
There is hardly anything to work out except maybe the weight. It is just a pair of 870s sharing a few components.
Rupert Willies
04-16-2009, 05:46 AM
Check these out:
http://tml.travellercentral.com/hillberg/index.html
And a Russian site discussing a Russian handicraft:
http://grossfater-m.livejournal.com/1113851.html
..if your Russian is rusty - like mine - and you enjoy deciphering Russlish:
http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=no&js=n&u=http%3A%2F%2Fgrossfater-m.livejournal.com%2F1113851.html&sl=ru&tl=en
Sweet..
TiggerCCW UK
04-16-2009, 06:10 AM
I was wondering about recoil, and how much the extra weight would help compensate for for the recoil of both barrels firing at once.
Targan
04-16-2009, 06:18 AM
The recoil would be worse, not better, because the weight is less than two 870s by themselves. There are some shared components it seems.
TiggerCCW UK
04-16-2009, 10:09 AM
Say double recoil plus one for the slightly lower weight? I haven't got my books to hand at the minute but I'm thinking that might work?
Targan
04-16-2009, 10:41 AM
Sounds reasonable to me. When firing single shots the extra weight would help to counteract the recoil a bit, perhaps minus one?
General Pain
04-22-2009, 07:31 AM
Its the munchkin gun!!! Anyone fancy working out stats?
http://www.lesjones.com/2008/06/16/double-barrel-pump-shotgun-moe-szyslak-style/
http://amodestpublication.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/homebuilt-double-barrel-pump-action-shotgun/
I\d go with Targan on this one
double rec when both are firing
but -1 when 1 barrel is firing
damage same or double comp. to a normal one(1 or 2 barrels)
weight : must be found i'd guess it woulod be allmost as much as 2 remingtons
bulk +1 or +2 or even +3 (for inexperienced users)
TiggerCCW UK
04-22-2009, 08:18 AM
I reckon double weight is near enough, plus it'll account for some of the encumberance of the weapon - its hardly the smallest and easiest weapon to carry. Plus 3 bulk I reckon is a fair amount as well.
How's this one sound for you General? The Mag 20 Freeway Blocker. Made from two Mag 10 road blockers :)
General Pain
04-22-2009, 09:00 AM
I reckon double weight is near enough, plus it'll account for some of the encumberance of the weapon - its hardly the smallest and easiest weapon to carry. Plus 3 bulk I reckon is a fair amount as well.
How's this one sound for you General? The Mag 20 Freeway Blocker. Made from two Mag 10 road blockers :)
The General is droooling-aarrghglhllgll(homer simpson sound)
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.