![]() |
There has been new modules released for Twilight 2000 including one new canon module - thus there are new releases for it that are "in print" - i.e. you can buy new material for it instead of having to depend on either a used bookstore or a pdf of material released years earlier
Thus technically the game was revived from the dead back in 2017 |
Quote:
https://www.team-yankee.com/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Haven't settled on the date as yet, but likely mid 2000. Hopefully this new edition won't impact what I've already done too much, and they won't be overly protective of their edition and will actually allow the community to add quality work to the base materials. It'd be even better if they published my work and I actually got paid! :p Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
About Modiphius, if they are involved, in my one experience with their new (relative terms I guess that was like 2017) Star Trek game, their playtesting process was easy to get involved with. I'd like to think they'd reach out to the community for some comments but who knows.
Whatever the ultimate outcome is, as someone who only contributes even more niche fan content (such as it is), I'll wait to see what happens and vote with my money. A bad timeline can go a long ways to that being a no-buy however the mechanical end turns out. T2K is a WWIII game to me, that's kind of a key aspect over other post-apocalyptic games out there to me. |
I've reached out to Modiphius on behalf of Raellus, Olefin and myself with the aim of discussing our products and how they might tie into the new edition.
Hopefully they get back to me shortly and we can figure something out. Noted this on their website: Quote:
|
Let's consider the last "made" contributors were people who have since retired from the industry for the most part, who the hell do they think they are going to get.
Yeah, I am now quite concerned. That said here is my POV, I am slowly writing my "Charters of Freedom" adventure. (and I do mean slowly...) but the fact is, Rae, Olefin, Leg, and maybe even me...(I only say that because we're published), could meet their standard, if they squint, but the fact remains? I am not too impressed by that. |
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/vBVmbN8.jpg |
Am a little iffy on "Team Yankee", just because of the copyrights involved. Battlefront is a big enough company to kick our asses, and they're going to want to develop something inhouse. Now, I do know Shawn Carpenter over at AAG, but he's taking a hiatus right now for personal reasons. And...he's not going to want to do this without permission from Marc Miller.
In short, we're going to have to get permission from Marc to do something like this. Not saying we can't do it, but Marc has got to give his blessing. And here's what I said on my blog: https://500twilight2000.blogspot.com...estion-to.html |
Quote:
I own several of the Modiphius games and really do not like their 2d20 system. Part of what my group and I enjoyed of Twilight 2000 (& The Morrow Project), was the 'feel' of the systems. To us the mechanics of those games worked with, and were an important part of the settings - they belonged together, and worked together - and to us non military types, 'felt' a bit military (and yes, gung ho-ing over the gun porn helped too lol) - for my groups at least. It is hard for me to imagine a twilight game that doesn't use v1/2 rules. My groups almost always preferred percentile based systems over d20, always felt more natural to us. My initial concern was that it might appear using the wotc 5e OGL lol. "Sarge! The LT is hit, we need a long rest!" |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
So summing up, it may be popular in some places, it is dead before arrival in mine. Locally, no store would even order it last time I asked, and no one knows anything about it as a game even now. |
"Monk's truck is hit by an RPG! Everyone make a save vs. spells to dive out and take no damage!"
Ok that is funny |
Just seen the news of this; be interesting to see how it goes...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Forget using the RPG on the truck, try using it on Monk with D&D rules - Monk's a Warrior class so he's got buckets of hitpoints. He could probably survive a direct hit to the torso with a PG-7 round because of this, even if he failed the Dex check. Which is exactly the reason I don't like using rules from a fantasy game for any modern, military, sci-fi or near-future games. |
Quote:
Remember, it's NOT a real fight in BRP/RuneQuest if someone isn't suffering an amputation! |
>tanking RPG hits
>falling from LEO and surviving Sounds like the perfect v5 ruleset /sarc |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People like Marcus Bone (who has been involved with ezines & a forum supporting the game as well as being part of the 2nd edition developers/writers), there's also Lee Williams (who has contributed to ezines as well as being part of the team behind the 3rd edition) are actively writing parts of the books such as character creation & development and updating equipment & gear lists and so on. |
It's good policy from a HR standpoint too. As you mentioned, a company can pick up good people at a minimal cost just by spreading the word through associated forums and the like.
We've got close to a thousand members in this forum alone, with what, about 50 or so active contributors per week give or take? I know as fact that there are quite a number of talented people in just those who are active, and many, many different and relevant skill sets. It just makes sense to look in places such as this for contributions and feedback. |
One of the other benefits is that they picked up writers who had some passion for the project, people who were invested in the game, rather than just contracting someone to write articles for something they have little/no interest in.
|
So I posted this on Steph's FB group but thought it might add to some of the discussion here...
Having written as a line author for an RPG company I’d note than many require a Non-Disclosure Agreement about unreleased products but also authors we would spend time “lurking” on forums etc (often being suspiciously quiet in retrospect) to get some idea of the mood and needs of the existing fan-base. All that being said edition change is complex and particularly when it involves a licence change from one company (usually with its preferred system) to another (likewise with it’s preferred system) - that’s just the nature of business but most successful edition changes do give some consideration to a one or two way “conversion” guide (often a free PDF) to draw on existing resources / fan base - the risk is affecting sales of subsequent supplements beyond the core rules, however a 2-way (back conversion eg v4 to v2.2 or v2013 even for T2k) can offset this in some cases. |
Guys,
Heard back from Modiphius Entertainment....Here is the text of their note. Quote:
|
Just to recap: we got news that Modiphius was working on T2K
Multi-post frenzy >Modiphius is not working on T2K Everything's normal here, just carry on. |
Ok so we know there is a version 4 being worked on, we know that Chris Lites is working on it (see multiple posts on Steph's Twilight 2000 facebook group) and that there will be an announcement on it in the fall and that Marc has confirmed that there will be a version 4
The inference that it would be Modiphius based on the fact that Chris works for them was not correct - a good educated guess but not correct based on the letter that Jason received Thus we will have to see who it is when the announcement is made and if they are open to running it past people here on this forum at that time |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.