![]() |
I had the option of using the forward pistol grip with my M4 and chose not to. I tried both options during the rare moments of down time during the train-up, and the forward pistol grip never felt natural to me. Of course, I'm an arch conservative when it comes to these sorts of things. I "grew up" using the M16A2, and my use of the M4 reflected my inherited prejudices.
|
Quote:
I believe in that regard, unless I'm mistaken, it's due to the big recoil buffer and spring in the M16 (and also the M4), hence why it's rather easy to shoot. In comparison, I heard the Steyr AUG doesn't quite have this setup, or the recoil buffer is smaller (someone please correct me here if I'm wrong!), hence recoil is slightly more of an issue. That and I hear the buttstock on the weapon isn't as comfortable to shoulder, but I'd like to hear opinions from our friends that have used the Steyr AUG before jumping to that conclusion. |
Quote:
:D |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Great! Thanks a lot, guys. Informative and entertaining postings! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I doubt it. Doesn't take much to search online and find all sorts of photos and video of well endowed women firing rifles, machineguns and other things that go bang. Granted, most of it is more focused on semi-naked women who've never held a weapon before in their lives, but large breasts still don't seem to be a problem.
Depends also on what they're wearing. We've all heard of such things as sports bras which tend to flatten the chest. Any active woman is likely to be seeking this sort of apparel out in preference to anything more soft and lacy one would expect (dammit!). As for a bullpup mag getting in the way, not a problem at all. Although located towards the rear of the weapon, it's still several inches from the buttplate. |
Quote:
|
I didn't have any back then. Now, twenty years later and as many kilos added to the waist however...I'm still somewhat of an Adonis. :p
|
Quote:
Man-Boobies! |
Quote:
http://www.armyproperty.com/Equipment-Info/M16A3-A4.htm Quote:
|
Quote:
How'd you manage that? I thought anything less than 16 inches for a carbine or rifle in civilian hands was illegal, or does that vary in some states, or perhaps you have to have an additional license and fees? Personally, I think the whole "16 inch rule" for civilian rifles is BS, but that's me. |
Quote:
Anyone (who can legally buy a firearm) can buy it with a $200 tax and registration with the BATFE, though, civilian or military. My point though, was that they exist and are on the market and in civilian gun shops so could be encountered in game. |
Quote:
Ah, that makes much more sense, thanks. :) And you'd be surprised what you'll find not so much in gun shops, but in more places that are a bit off the beaten trail, so to speak around here, or maybe not. :p I still think Yamamoto said it best, "You cannot invade the mainland United States, there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." |
This whole thing makes me mad! The more you know, the more questions arise :mad:
The AN/PEQ-2 would be in service. Is it right, that it only produces an infrared beam (More precise: 2 different, but still infrared beams, one narrow, one wide!)? That means, it could only be used during nighttime and only by operators, wearing IR-goggles. Did some kind of LAD exist, that could switch to laser (projecting a red dot to the target) or infrared laser? And: If the operator wears IR-goggles, would an attached ACOG interfere with proper handling of the rifle? And some more: As far as I know, it is impossible to use IR-goggles and some kind of sniper scope at the same time, right? Err ... Thanks in advance! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The operator wearing IR goggles and an AN/PEQ-2 won't be looking through the ACOG. Doesn't need to. If the AN/PEQ-2 is properly bore sighted to the weapon then whatever the beam is placed on that is wear the bullet will hit. Laser pointer of death. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.