RPG Forums

RPG Forums (https://forum.juhlin.com/index.php)
-   Twilight 2000 Forum (https://forum.juhlin.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   if you could have any vehicle (https://forum.juhlin.com/showthread.php?t=4921)

unkated 08-21-2015 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sanjuro (Post 66444)
When I drove for a living I used to see this quite often...
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=...fH0&ajaxhist=0

And you could resist the urge to roll over it?

Uncle Ted

Bullet Magnet 08-22-2015 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Legbreaker (Post 66443)
For the more devout soldier....
Attachment 3459

It presents a bit of a high profile, but it might work for camo in some urban settings.

Some ideas for use:
Mobile chapel for an armored division
The vehicle the company chaplain uses...he takes both roles, soldier and clergy, VERY seriously.
Or, for when the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch just isn't up to the task at hand, and you need something stronger.

ArmySGT. 08-22-2015 03:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 3461

Sanjuro 08-22-2015 04:06 PM

I have thought of a problem with the vehicle I posted: having to explain to the Marauders that it is only a car, I don't have any chocolate!

pmulcahy11b 08-23-2015 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmySGT. (Post 66474)

What the hell is that?

Legbreaker 08-23-2015 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66480)
What the hell is that?

Justification for incendiary weapons.

ArmySGT. 08-23-2015 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66480)
What the hell is that?

Battle Meter Maids....... Do not occupy a position after being told to displace.

LT. Ox 08-23-2015 09:20 PM

speed
 
Top speed is negative 12

rcaf_777 08-24-2015 12:25 PM

5 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66432)
From what I understand, it's mostly fiberglass, with little actual room inside.

Looks big enough to me, and look the Nutmobile

LT. Ox 08-24-2015 03:19 PM

Hmmmmm
 
Let me see a crew of one and four fully equipped wieners.
Hell I had enough trouble with Marines just riding around on top of a M113 ain’t no way I am coming Out of a wiener!!!
:devil:

.45cultist 08-24-2015 03:21 PM

Convoy!, the cadbury eggmobiles are escorts.

unkated 08-24-2015 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66480)
What the hell is that?

Some from of Piaggio Ape (Bee in Italian).

Light utility trike with several sizes of Vespa engine; been around since the 1960s. Bed can manage 200-1000 kg.

Perhaps it's a Mexican verison, making it one of the Killer Bees!
http://snltranscripts.jt.org/75/pics/75ibees5.jpg


Diesel engine Piaggio Ape TM (1982)

Size: 3.39 x1.5x1.63 m
Veh Wgt: 465 kg
Small diesel engine; 15 lt tank; Fuel Consumption: 4 lt/4hr period
Cargo: 750 km

Trv Move: 130/40 km
Cbt Move: 30/10 m

Uncle Ted

Legbreaker 08-24-2015 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LT. Ox (Post 66493)
......ain’t no way I am coming Out of a wiener!!!
:devil:

Not again anyway. ;)

pmulcahy11b 08-24-2015 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcaf_777 (Post 66492)
Looks big enough to me, and look the Nutmobile

Big enough to bring your dog! (And don't start...)

LT. Ox 08-24-2015 09:36 PM

ah heck!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66498)
Big enough to bring your dog! (And don't start...)

So many thoughts and so many things to say and you cut me off at the.......:censored:

Legbreaker 08-26-2015 01:45 AM

Because you can never have enough firepower
 
Attachment 3469

LT. Ox 08-26-2015 11:24 AM

not a MG
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Legbreaker (Post 66524)

Err may I stand BEHIND you Sir?

StainlessSteelCynic 08-26-2015 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Legbreaker (Post 66524)

I see your 10 barrel SPG and raise you with my landship!

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/...20130607211045

The scary thing is, these "landships" were actually proposed by some people after WW1, some were even meant to sail to where they were needed then come ashore to continue the fight.
No matter that they were utterly beyond the technology of the time... oh and utterly impractical! Supplying one of those things would be akin to a modern US super carrier, an amphibious assault ship and a WW2 battleship all rolled into one.
Talk about "arms race".

Legbreaker 08-26-2015 06:57 PM

Well the Soviets did give it a shot with their T28...

Attachment 3470

And of course the Americans did their bit with their own T28 super heavy tank.

Attachment 3471
Attachment 3472

ArmySGT. 08-26-2015 09:52 PM

http://drawingdatabase.com/wp-conten.../hetzer_16.jpg

I have always liked for no real reason the Panzer 38T "Hetzer"

http://www.achtungpanzer.com/jagdpanzer-38t-hetzer.htm

unkated 08-27-2015 01:38 PM

PzJgd-38 Hetzer
 
I have also always liked the Hetzer. Something... compactly competent about it.

Hetzers were built Post WW2 by Czechoslovakia and sold to Austria as the G-13, which fielded them to the early 1970s. Some could be unearthed in a warehouse and revived in 1996/7 as reserves for the Austrian Army...

Uncle Ted

LT. Ox 08-27-2015 04:59 PM

I wonder
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unkated (Post 66544)
I have also always liked the Hetzer. Something... compactly competent about it.

Hetzers were built Post WW2 by Czechoslovakia and sold to Austria as the G-13, which fielded them to the early 1970s. Some could be unearthed in a warehouse and revived in 1996/7 as reserves for the Austrian Army...

Uncle Ted

What weapons system would that have? Same as developed or would I look else where for change info?

Legbreaker 08-27-2015 06:42 PM

The Swiss also bought 158 of them which served into the 1970's, renaming them as the G-13 (any designated G-13 definitely served with the Swiss).
The Soviets regunned them with their 76.2mm but otherwise kept them basically the same.
The Czechs converted some of theirs by replacing the gun with a flame thrower, although Hitler had ordered this conversion in November 1944 so it's unknown if the Czechs did it themselves, or just picked up a few which had already been done.
From what I can see though, it doesn't look like too many other alterations were made to the armament.
There is no indication I can find of Austria having any after the war (I suspect unkated confused them with Switzerland).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hetzer
http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_Hetzers_G13.pdf

StainlessSteelCynic 08-27-2015 06:47 PM

Hey Leg, don't forget the British A39 Tortoise heavy assault tank - it only weighed 79ton... only!
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...5-Tortoise.jpg

I too am a fan for the Hetzer, like unkated mentioned, there seems to be something about it. Competent is a good word, it's no too fussy in its design, uncluttered and still compact. Unsurprisingly it was a very good ambush weapon even though the troops didn't particularly like it - too cramped.

Hey unkated, did you mean Switzerland instead of Austria?
LT. Ox, the G13 was armed with a 75mm KwK 40 main gun, the same gun as mounted on the Panzer IV late model G and H & J models as well as on the StuG III F & G models and the StuG IV. AKA the 7.5cm KwK 40. The Swiss also removed the remote MG installation from the roof and placed the commander opposite to the German Hetzer (i.e. Swiss placed commander on the left, gunner & loader on the right). The Swiss also had a field telephone installed on the rear for external comms.
They got 158 G13 assault guns as well as some recovery vehicle models.
They also modernized some of the assault guns to G13D standard which included replacing the petrol engine with a diesel model.

However the interesting item is that the Czechoslovaks fielded a large number under the designation ST-I. They were either repaired or new build Hetzers and carried the original 7.5cm KwK39 main gun or were unarmed and used as training vehicles (called the ST-III). Some of the ST-IIIs had a superstructure built on while others retained the basic lines of the Hetzer. They built/rebuilt 50 to the ST-III spec for a total of 299 vehicles (249 ST-I & 50 ST-III). The Czechoslovaks used them till the mid 1950s and not much is known about them afterwards although they are believed to have been scrapped.
For game purposes however, there's no reason why they couldn't have kept them in their war reserve.

Apparently Israel was interested in buying 60 or 70 ST-I vehicles but they were too pricey, about twice the price of a Sherman tank, so they never bothered and got Shermans instead.

Crappy photo but the only one I could find...
ST-III
http://www.aviarmor.net/tww2/photo/g...tzer_st3_1.jpg

Although this drawing makes it clearer. ST-III
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41chtpJkd3L.jpg

What's intriguing though, is that apparently the Czechoslovaks exported eleven ST-I vehicles & spares to Guinea, West Africa between 1959 & 1961.

The other interesting thing about the Hetzer, it formed the basis for for the WW2 Germans' first purpose made, fully tracked, APC, the Vollkettenaufklarer 38(t) "Kätzchen" AKA full-tracked reconnaissance vehicle 38(t) "Kitten". It would carry up to 8 troops and act in a similar role as the White Scout Car (or in modern terms, an M3 Bradley CFV without the 25mm and TOW).

Kätzchen wooden mock-up showing general height.
http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/vlkt.jpg
One of the working prototypes
http://www.aviarmor.net/tww2/photo/g...zhen_bmm_6.jpg

As it probably would have looked in service
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-W10dQaL7Zd...0/DSC_0836.JPG

StainlessSteelCynic 08-27-2015 06:49 PM

Well it looks like I dawdled too long getting my reply posted!
Beaten to the punch by Legbreaker - curse you! :p

Legbreaker 08-27-2015 06:52 PM

I may have beaten you to the punch, but yours has more info - you missed the flame throwers though! :p

unkated 08-31-2015 04:13 PM

Hetzer
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Legbreaker (Post 66551)
The Swiss also bought 158 of them which served into the 1970's, renaming them as the G-13 (any designated G-13 definitely served with the Swiss).
The Soviets regunned them with their 76.2mm but otherwise kept them basically the same.

Swiss (yes, I misremembered it; not Austrian; I got enthused by the Austrian 2001 Sourcebook posted in this forum) G-13s were armed with StuK 40, which is the German 7.5cm KwK40 Tank gun in a slightly different mount (same gun as that Panther discovered earlier this year).

As a T2K vehicle, it would be something like this: (hmmm should be attached)

ArmySGT. 08-31-2015 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unkated (Post 66636)
Swiss (yes, I misremembered it; not Austrian; I got enthused by the Austrian 2001 Sourcebook posted in this forum) G-13s were armed with StuK 40, which is the German 7.5cm KwK40 Tank gun in a slightly different mount (same gun as that Panther discovered earlier this year).

As a T2K vehicle, it would be something like this: (hmmm should be attached)

That machinegun can be fired from under cover via a periscope and swivels 360 degrees. A smart commander doesn't let the gun go empty and clips a fresh belt onto the first before it runs out. This way the commander does not expose himself to enemy fire.

ArmySGT. 09-01-2015 01:21 PM

Anyone doing a WW2 campaign with T2k rulesets?

Twilight1939 or Twilight1941?

unkated 09-01-2015 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic (Post 66552)
The other interesting thing about the Hetzer, it formed the basis for for the WW2 Germans' first purpose made, fully tracked, APC, the Vollkettenaufklarer 38(t) "Kätzchen" AKA full-tracked reconnaissance vehicle 38(t) "Kitten". It would carry up to 8 troops and act in a similar role as the White Scout Car (or in modern terms, an M3 Bradley CFV without the 25mm and TOW).

To be fair, the Hetzer was derived itself from the Czech Pz-38t (t = Tzech in German), developed just before Czechoslovakia was overrun and dismembered by Germany (with help from Hungary and Russia). The Germans used the Pzr 38 light tank early in the war (better armor and weapons than a Panzer 2), and kept the chassis in production and development through the war - the factories were churning them out and they worked fine.

In addition to the Hetzer, the chassis carried SP AA guns, SP artillery and SPAT (some versions of Marder). Katzchen was another derivation.

Uncle Ted

unkated 09-01-2015 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmySGT. (Post 66665)
Anyone doing a WW2 campaign with T2k rulesets?

Twilight1939 or Twilight1941?

There was someone related to the Yahoo T2K group that was doing a Pacific WW2 campaign a while ago. I remember reading an AAR. You could probably find a link to the person there.

Uncle Ted

StainlessSteelCynic 09-01-2015 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unkated (Post 66666)
To be fair, the Hetzer was derived itself from the Czech Pz-38t (t = Tzech in German), developed just before Czechoslovakia was overrun and dismembered by Germany (with help from Hungary and Russia). The Germans used the Pzr 38 light tank early in the war (better armor and weapons than a Panzer 2), and kept the chassis in production and development through the war - the factories were churning them out and they worked fine.

In addition to the Hetzer, the chassis carried SP AA guns, SP artillery and SPAT (some versions of Marder). Katzchen was another derivation.

Uncle Ted

Very similar story for the earlier LT vz35 AKA Pzr 35(t) although it never had the conversion desirability that the LT vz38 had. I reckon the Germans were probably put off by the pneumatic drive system and the engine heat getting into the crew compartment and figured it wasn't worth converting it further?
Interestingly, a British company was looking for a production licence for the vz35 just before the Germans began their occupation of Czechoslovakia. Another interesting point, there was also a variant built for Afghanistan.

pmulcahy11b 09-01-2015 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmySGT. (Post 66665)
Anyone doing a WW2 campaign with T2k rulesets?

Twilight1939 or Twilight1941?

I posted on my PDF page a PDF of a now-defunct site someone did on WWII (and the Arab-Israeli Wars) in T2K v1 rules.

StainlessSteelCynic 09-01-2015 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66669)
I posted on my PDF page a PDF of a now-defunct site someone did on WWII (and the Arab-Israeli Wars) in T2K v1 rules.

Could you tell me what the name of the pdf is please Paul? I had a quick look but couldn't see anything that specifically stated WW2 or Arab-Israeli Wars. :(

ArmySGT. 09-02-2015 02:40 PM

What is the rule system(s) for statting out vehicles?
 
What are the pertinent rules and formulas for building the stats for various vehicles for the V1 and 2.2 systems any way? As much as people come over here asking for stats on weapons and vehicles seems like some tutorials are I order.

unkated 09-02-2015 03:29 PM

Weapons rules are the most straight froward; the formulas used are presented in the V2 Infantry Weapons Guide, spread out across two pages.

The key values you need are

Bullet weight
Receiver type (Single shot, Bolt action, lever action, pump action, semi auto, full auto, Single action revolver, double action revolver)
Weapon weight
Weapon length
Muzzle velocity
Rate of fire (for automatic weapons)

Uncle Ted

.45cultist 09-02-2015 03:34 PM

Fire, Fusion,& Steel for Traveller the New Era has them as well.

pmulcahy11b 09-02-2015 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic (Post 66673)
Could you tell me what the name of the pdf is please Paul? I had a quick look but couldn't see anything that specifically stated WW2 or Arab-Israeli Wars. :(

It doesn't seem I ever actually uploaded it. Damn. Give me until the morning.

StainlessSteelCynic 09-02-2015 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b (Post 66701)
It doesn't seem I ever actually uploaded it. Damn. Give me until the morning.

:) no problem Paul, I didn't know anyone had done something on the Arab-Israeli wars so while I'm naturally curious to see the doc, it doesn't have to be "right now!" :D

LT. Ox 09-03-2015 01:10 AM

People pleasing
 
It is in his nature.:)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.