![]() |
A couple of other observations:
First, while ATGMs do have a much longer effective range than AT guns, local terrain will likely greatly limit advantage, unless you flatten and clear everything within 3,000 meters. (OTOH, the ambush factor of an ATGM that finds a commanding view firing at very long range is significant.) Secondly, AT guns have a useful role against attacking infantry, firing HE or some type of multiple-projectile round. |
Quote:
|
Disclaimer - This post is made on the basis of complete ignorance.
Would EMP have affected the guidance systems of the fancy schmancy missiles? That could be another big point in favour of AT guns. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We were told to expect 5% or so failure rate, during good times. No clue how close that is to reality though. |
Great story, Cavtroop. On a related note, I wonder how well the sighting/targetting and command guidance systems would hold up under battlefield conditions.
|
Quote:
Regarding EMP and missiles, that's a very interesting question and one I doubt we're ever going to be able to answer (at least until certain secret and restricted documents are made public). My guess is that most simple AT weapons should be fine (one the whole) - M72s and the like anyway as there's almost no components in them to be effected. More sophisticated wire guided, or "fire and forget" systems are another matter. One would hope that exposed systems would be sent back to the unit armourer for testing and repair and so this shouldn't be too much of an issue by 2000 (no nukes in a few years). On the other hand, if a hidden cache of munitions was found..... Just think of the possibilities for an evil GM! :devil5: |
Quote:
|
Were NATO tube artillery units issued with AP rounds for self defense? If they were, I supposed then they could be used as AT guns in a pinch.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I already answered webstral in a private message but it seems that the smilies I chose in my last post brought some confusion. Sorry about that for anyone who founded that I might have been offensive and sorry to web. I truly found his point a good point.
Thanks anyone:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Webstral |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.