OMG I CANNOT believe Obama did this
 

Hollywood is planning a big budget movie on the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Sounds good; I'd pay to see it. The producer and director were given an audience with the SECNAV and the SOCOM Commander, as well as the Admiral in charge of SEAL operations; unclassified information only. Good, the movie has the support of the US Military. Should make it better.

Then...THEN...Obama took the director and producer out in his helicopter to meet with...wait for it...SEAL Team 6! WTF!!!! Virtually no one is supposed to know the identities of SEAL Team 6, and especially not some Hollywood producer and director!!!

I've been generally supportive of Obama; yes, he's done a few dumb things, but in general, he's done a decent job of pulling the country out of Bush's fireball express. But this, if substantiated, is a genuine, no holds barred, head-up-your-ass moment.

I just heard this on MSNBC, and though it was leading story, I want to believe it has no substance for now. But christ what a dummy if he did that.

Let's see ....

I do not know how trustworthy MSNBC is compared to BBC, so take the following under the assumption that the story is true and these guys are as trustworthy as the BBC (which does have a bias on occasions)

I can see why some idiots in the biggest group of pirates in the world (look at the history, Hollywood is only there because of patient fights with Edison) would think that this would be a "good idea"
I doubt so much that it was the REAL team 6, or even if it's the team 6 that did the op, if it was, balaclavas everywhere
I would know what "credibility" the movie would get if it was "made from actual eye-witnesses and the real team 6", so in relation to point two, I think that was some spin put on to make the movie more "bad-ass" thus giving them the boost up in "gun-toting, batshit insane rednecks" that they are probably looking at for their target market.

Note, not all people who have guns are insane or rednecks, and not all rednecks are batshit insane or own guns, but there some select few that alas, defined the stereotype.

great...
 

Now we have thread that insults BOTH liberals and Obama supporters AND "batshitcrazy gun toting rednecks"

:D

well done lads.

No seriously - the movie producer meeting Seal team 6 - I guess the movie increases in value with every grain of actual connection to US special forces that they can get.

Let's not jump to conclusions. IF this story is true, we can probably assume that, at this meeting, the SEALs were not using their real names, and/or were wearing masks/disguises, and/or were not videotaped or photographed. If OPSEC wasn't followed, then yes, this would be an incredibly boneheaded move.

I'm hoping that Mark Bowden writes a book about the operation.

What's so bad about Director wanting to get his film right?

Sure hollywood hasallot of screwups (pearl harbour anyone?), but if this director is meeting up with the lads in question in order to get the film right, cudos to him.

Speaking for the gun toting batshit crazy redneck crowd, knowing Obama had anything to do with the film is a Detraction, not an Atraction.

PS, I can't believe most of the stuff Obama does.

Careful with the politics, guys.

there is precedent for this. There was a recent movie that was marketed "starring active duty Navy SEALS" (also Special Warfare Combat Crewman).

anyone see Act of Valor?

wikipedia link if you want to read a plot summary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Valor

Without knowing any of the details, I can only trust that the professionals involved in putting SEAL Team 6 in front of the camera insisted on adequate protection regarding the identities of the SEALs. To believe otherwise is to believe that the folks at the top of the SEAL chain of command are bunglers who can't be bothered to a) follow procedure or b) look out for the best interests of their men and to believe that the President would willingly and for no real gain expose the members of SEAL Team 6 to retaliation for their role in killing Osama bin Laden. Not liking President Obama is one thing. Believing that he would capriciously risk the lives of the SEALs against the advice of his military professionals is to put partisan politics ahead of common sense. Psychologists call this phenomenon "demonizing", by which we justify our dislike of someone by believing unbelievable [negative] things about him. In the absence of hard evidence to the contrary, we must assume that adequate safeguards were put in place.

How much of this movie is not going to be 100% pure and unadulterated propaganda...?

I'm extremely doubtful the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth will have much involvement in this. Remember, it's an election year. What's the odds it'll be rushed through production and air just before voting day...?

Me, a cynic? Never! :rolleyes:

A politician (of any stripe) with common sense is a contradiction in terms.

At which point I bite my tongue and withdraw before I make ANY comments. ;)

Why is bat shit any crazier than any other type of shit?

The smell. It's unique.:D

Bat shit, or guano, is used in a variety of consumer products, such as cosmetics.:D

Because for the longest time, it was a key ingredient to high explosives?

I understood it to stem from the phrase "bats in the belfry" which, by extrapolation, insinuates a head full of bat guano. But I like the ammonium nitrate angle, too.

hhhmmm. American cinema has a long tradition of setting movies in our wars, and I do not see why the war on terror should be an exception. I cannot understand how any citizen of a law abiding country would refuse to celebrate the killing of the man that engineered and ordered the attacks on 9/11.

As for getting the truth all I can say is we can't have it both ways. Either you get the whole truth and give away confidential information on the identities of service members and operational procedures, or you give it the Hollywood treatment and try to make a movie that is engaging and entertaining.

Blaming the commander-in-chief seems a little disingenuous before the film is even made, especially considering the recent release of a movie with active-duty members of the Navy Seals who were photographed at the premier of Act of Duty with their dates.

I'm probably just being cynical. It's the timing of it I'm questioning most of all - Bin Laden's bones have barely even hit the ocean floor and operations are still going on in the area! Even here the 1st anniversary was a big deal on the news and soon after this movie is announced just six months before the US election?

Coincidence?

Maybe....

Bah! You're just pissed because the director offed that boy off of Neighbours in the first five minutes of "Hurt Locker". I will not have the integrity of the director of "Point Break" impinged.

Anyone who casts Reeves and Swayze in the same film is beyond our understanding and we should not dare to judge them.

Neighbours!? Complete drivel! Never watch it and risk my brain being melted.
It's his other work that's gained my approval.

Neighbours is some horribly lowly crap.

Last time I watched neighbours, Kylie Minogue was still married to jason Donovan

Ah, "the Singing Budgie". Ok, so some good has come out of Neighbours.

Because I'm a secular humanist and I don't agree with celebrating the killing of anyone?

To be fair, a few good things have come out of Neighbours...Holly Valance and Natalie Imbruglia (sp?) also spring to mind.

Mmm, Holly Valance. Yum.

I can't understand how a law abiding citizen of a supposedly civilised western democracy could celebrate the death of anyone, no matter what their crimes.

The rule of law is such that execution is a required evil, it is not something to be celebrated or welcomed. To take visceral pleasure in another's death is to lower yourself to their inhuman depths.

I did not cheer and celebrate the death of Bin laden, I accepted that his death was a requirement to limit further bloodshed, a required act of evil to stop further, greater evil.

Celebrate does not mean to take visceral pleasure.

My intent in using the word celebrate was a reference to the second definition, and your suggestion that I have lowered myself to inhuman depths is a ridiculous exaggeration.

what!!
 

Its one of the most true documentaries I have ever seen about Aussie life and society - except Crocodile Dundee and Romper Stomper of course. Also good documentaries.

;)

Romper Stomper. :p
Yep, 99% of us Australians are just like that. :cool:

I'll grant you I spontaneously yelled when I heard the announcement that Bin Laden was dead, but it's not like I got pleasure from it. When I hear that Texas has executed another scumbag, I may think, "justice done," I'm not getting pleasure from it.

I also know the kind of scars you get on your soul when you kill someone, even when you know it was the right thing to do. A member of SEAL Team 6 or a state executioner probably has a soul that is filled with those scars. To them, well done, you're braver than I.

And the other 1% are like Priscilla, Queen of the Desert? :D

And you're firmly in that 1% aren't you... :D

Yeah man, for real. H&K USP Tactical in one hand, Prada handbag in the other... :naughty:

Well there is another tea stain on the wall

I could of gone the rest of my life without that image.

At least he didn't tell you about his stilettos, hair, troweled on makeup and that slinky little dress he's wearing....

And all with three day old stubble....



...poking through his stockings.

I think about the guy I didn't kill. I'm sure I mentioned the incident in "Adagio for Strings". It's easy enough to press the trigger, it turns out. But a guy I could have killed saw his mom again because I didn't press the trigger, despite having all the wrong reasons for doing so. Whatever else happens, I'm not a mindless thug. I sleep a bit better knowing that.

If that image bouncing around in my head [expletive deleted] up my Saturday night with the missus, you sir will be getting a candygram of mega sour pusses.

:D

Fishnet stockings....

:D