Yes, I too preffer radial engines, but, one can not argue with the inline engines of the Alison variety that powered the Spitfire or the P-51 Mustang, two planes that were some of the best of their class. And the P-51 was still in service with some nations into the 70s.
As for F-4, it would be cool, but the amount of JP-4 they would require is insane. Hit after burner and forget it.
As for man hours, if you have the personel then it doesn't matter that much. Heck, even today the CH-53s and CH-46s require an ungodly amount of maintenance hours for each flight hour. It is what comes with using old airframes. My main thing with Jets vs piston driven is one requires alot of technology to keep it in the air. Others, well you can work on them in a garage and even use a regular mechanic for some of its maintenance, as well as high grade vehicle items. And parts can be fabricated easier than those for a new F-18. And all the other support services needed to keep them in the air.
As for biplanes! Oh yeah! Those could be made quite easily, and some of them flew on kerosene which would be interesting. Or how about a small fleet of dirgibles? They follow the wind, fly about the enemy lines taking pictures and dropping bombs as they pass enemy positions. then, they return with the wind several hours later to freindly lines.
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."
|