View Single Post
  #9  
Old 09-03-2010, 03:09 PM
Adm.Lee Adm.Lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,387
Default

One could always try the Byzantine strategy of using warlords against one another. If you need stuff from Phoenix, are all of those things under just one warlords' control? What if you traded with Warlord A one week, and Warlord B the next month, and so on? It sounds needlessly complex, but it might avoid the dilemma of making Warlord A so powerful that he can dominate the region.

It could also backfire horribly, if Warlord C takes out both A and B, and refuses to deal with SAMAD at all. Especially if A and B wear themselves out fighting over resources to trade with SAMAD.
__________________
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.
Reply With Quote