Quote:
Originally Posted by Panther Al
What's it say for the pentagons pet project when not even a year passed before they found out its no good protection wise, and they invalidated the prime reason they picked it (C130 transportable) by adding more and more armour on the thing?
|
Gee doesn't surprise me, these are the same people who thought up-armoring HMMWVs would be good stop-gap measure.