Quote:
Originally Posted by Panther Al
I love it. 
|
Thanks! This was fun to write. Just barely plausible enough to work, I think.
Quote:
"nor was overly-enthusiastic engagement of non-targets such as migratory birds and rain squalls."
I can sooooo see that happening with a kludged up system like that.
|
The mental image of it interdicting outbound friendly MLRS rounds was what sold me on this.
Quote:
But on a more serious note, Engaging ATGM's? I can buy that, the system was designed to shoot down missiles after all. I can easily see a commander placing one in and armoured assualt with a mission of intercepting incoming missiles, at least till the sovs learned that the slugger needs to be struck out asap.
|
*nod* I gave that some serious though, and I might yet update the writeup. I didn't want it to come across as too uber a system, though, particularly with its drastically shortened development cycle. On the other hand, I have to admit that one of these providing ATGM interdiction for a whole armor platoon on the move is the sort of thing that would look really good on film. I don't know how well it'd handle ground clutter that close, though - what's the usual flight altitude of an ATGM (prior to popping up for top attack)?
- C.