View Single Post
  #12  
Old 06-07-2011, 02:07 PM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
I'm assuming that reloading while the tank is stationary is somewhat easier and therefore quicker than on the move?
It also seems reasonable to assume that in general, no more than a couple of rounds will be fired in any one minute given that the tank should be manoeuvring around the battlefield, supporting and supported by several other tanks and because of said movement, the terrain will be getting in the way on a fairly regular basis unless it's a flat, featureless plain).
That's another advantage of the M-1, the loader has a switch that he can hit that freezes the gun tube at the best angle for reloading. The gunner can still keep his sights on target, but when the loader slaps the safety into the fire position....you had better have any body parts that you want to keep out of the way of the breech because the computer moves the tube into alignment with the gunner's sight. So on the move, I'd give the M-1 a shorter reload time.

On the other hand, an older tank, such as a M-60A1, I'd add a second or two due to the juggling act that the loader has to do.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote