From what I've seen on the news, it seems like it was one man who's claiming to have had support from two other organisations. By "organisations" he could mean two other separate people or entire chains of them.
My thoughts are how is he going to get a fair trial? He's claimed responsibility however plead not guilty, which of course will necessitate a trial. We all know what the outcome of that will be, and by now everyone in the country will have heard of him and what's happened, so his best defence now could be to claim the inability of a fair trial coupled perhaps with insanity.
Although more guilty than anyone wants to believe, this monster might get off with little more than a slap on the wrist and a year or two of psychiatric treatment - and then somebody, perhaps a grieving parent, will put a bullet in him.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.
Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"
Mors ante pudorem
|