Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmySGT.
Oh yeah,
He is every where there is the M113.
He will spazz on museum sites, Youtube, scribed, military history sites, scribd.com etc.
Some much so that at the first utterance of the "#avin" name that poster gets banned.
The M113 is just the M113 it has never had a name.
His other crap is just crap. The M113 is lightly armored to make it air transportable or lifted by a heavy lift helo. This means the armor is good enough for small arms and shell splinters.
There's a reason you see Troops riding on top.
|
What sickens me about the guy is that I've seen reposts on YT - by him - of Jihadi videos showing Abrams, Bradleys, Strykers, Humvees and other vehicles/tracks being destroyed by IED usually with some bullshit in the description of ANOTHER POINTLESS LOSS BECAUSE THE ARMY REFUSED TO USE THE PROPER VEHICLE HERE. He got particularly vile about some early losses of AAV-7s early in the Iraq invasion. A pair got hit by RPGs and were total losses (as were the crews and troops inside) and he leapt on it making some kind of connection about how that somehow wouldn't have happened to an M113...