Thread: T-90 vs Abrams
View Single Post
  #25  
Old 11-17-2011, 10:53 PM
Panther Al's Avatar
Panther Al Panther Al is offline
Sabre Ready!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DC Area
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to Panther Al
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmySGT. View Post
Fuel Consumption- Four Gallons to the mile

Needs an APU to keep everything on and idle without consuming a lot of fuel.

Field phone for Infantry coordination had to be re-invented.

Thermal signature moving and at idle is huge. The heat bloom coming off can't be masked by nets with the turbine running.

67 tons is to much for a lot of bridges, ferries, and pontoons.

Amphibious like a brick.
Rough Terrain Performance Sucks - A Merkava can outrun an M1 over rough terrain. This is an established fact - its one of the reasons the Israeli's decided *not* to get the M1, with the other being its a firebomb waiting to happen due to the use of Hydraulics in the Turret. True, the fluid is Fire Resistant, but it was the experiences they had with Hydraulic systems in earlier wars that proved using Hydraulics in the Fighting Compartment was a *very* bad idea.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
Reply With Quote