Thread: T-90 vs Abrams
View Single Post
  #51  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:53 AM
ShadoWarrior's Avatar
ShadoWarrior ShadoWarrior is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragoon500ly View Post
The Strategic Bombing Survey conducted after the war mentioned that the Air Force had some success killing tanks with bombs (but required a direct hit to kill a tank), strafing with .50 caliber, while murder for trucks, simply scratched paint on a tank and the use of aerial rockets was more anti-personnel/anti-vehicle than it was anti-tank. It was generally agreed that the Air Force's greatest impact was in knocking out the logistical tail of the panzers.
While I agree concerning the infrastructure destruction having the most impact on the front, it's not bombs vs. tanks I was alluding to. Tactical air (P-47s and Typhoons) using rockets were devastating to German tanks caught in the open.

I'll grant that using rockets against soft vehicles was much easier, as a near miss was still a kill due to blast and shrapnel. But if pilots could score a direct hit on turret top armor, or especially against the armor over the engine compartment, the tank was effectively out for the rest of the war.
__________________
If you find yourself in a fair fight you didn't plan your mission properly!

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't.

Last edited by ShadoWarrior; 11-21-2011 at 10:00 AM.
Reply With Quote