Quote:
Originally Posted by RN7
I don't like witnessing arguments and I don't care to have my name dragged through all of this just because I defended someone who has been very publically critisised, and because I stated my own worries about something I don't agree with. I have a right to say and discuss things without being publicaly put down by you.
|
I apologize for insinuating that you enjoy witnessing arguments. It was not meant as a put-down. If people publicly confront Legbreaker about his forum beheavior, precedent strongly suggests an argument will ensue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RN7
Why did you have to publically air all of this? Perhaps publically questioning who was privatlely accusing him it wasn't the wisest thing for Legbreaker to do, but you told the whole forum that they did so I think the man has the right to ask who it was.
|
The current ban was publicly announced because the last ban (also involving Legbreaker) was publicly announced by the forum admin two years ago. We wanted people to know that we'd dealt with the problem. There's also the thought that a public notice would encourage, not only the afore-mentioned parties, but everyone who read it, to behave in a more civil, constructive manner.