Thread: Beta C-Mags
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:00 AM
Mahatatain Mahatatain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK, near Maidstone in Kent
Posts: 347
Default

Thanks for the help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
The patent for the C-Mag was filed in April 1987
Here's a link to the patent document
http://www.google.com/patents?id=A6s...page&q&f=false

According to this website, the US Army tested the C-Mag recently in Afghanistan and found it had problems. Typically these were jams and failures to accept the stated 100-rds into the mag.
http://www.defendamerica.mil/article.../a072803b.html
Thanks for the date.

From the research I've done I think that they are susceptible to breakage, particularly if dropped or bashed. They therefore sound like a good option but shouldn't be exclusively relied upon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raketenjagdpanzer View Post
The soldier in the foreground on my 1.0 boxed set has an M16 sporting one.
I'd forgotten about that. Being picky though I don't think that that is a Beta C-Mag in the drawing as its got one drum not two. What other extended mags were available at the time? Does anyone know?
Reply With Quote