View Single Post
  #21  
Old 10-17-2012, 06:52 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

Thanks, Mike. Some great material there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post
Woud Soviet commerce raiders (subs, primarily) begin attacking convoys carrying supplies to Europe before U.S. and other NATO forces began military operations against PACT forces in East Germany?
Only if they were ready to go to war with NATO as a whole at that point. The boys in the Kremlin would know that the Americans would consider this an act of war. CINC GSFG would point out that the addition of the remaining forces of NATO to the fighting in Germany would exacerbate the balance of forces problem. There was no point in sinking a few or a couple dozen supply ships in the Atlantic if the prompt entrance of NATO into the equation ended up costing the Pact their hold on East Germany.

On the other hand, the Soviets would have known that the US was resupplying West Germany. They might have tried claiming that shipments of arms and ammunition constituted active support for West Germany. Therefore, Soviet naval forces should have been free to intercept shipping bound for West Germany. The US could have gotten around this by landing arms and ammunition elsewhere in Western Europe. And again, torpedoing American vessels in international waters would give the US its casus belli—something best avoided, since the Soviets were not prepared to bring a conventional war in Germany to a successful conclusion until the end of November.
__________________
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Reply With Quote