View Single Post
  #17  
Old 12-16-2012, 06:26 AM
Lundgren Lundgren is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude_uk View Post
Which idiot at NATO HQ thought that one up?! And more importantly the British Army toy-box is empty, what units?
Good points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Nuke usage in T2K doesn't exactly follow any plans I've ever heard about.
As the saying goes, no plan ever survive the contact with the enemy. In my opinion, plans are just a foundation for improvisation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panther Al View Post
(In short: The TDM was too massive in too short a time to allow emergency services to do a good job in dealing with the effects, but too small and targeted on the right targets without hitting others, that would force a epically massive need for the same.)
I agree as well. Just one hit in an urban area would probably tie up most of a countries medical and firefighting abilities.

One thing to remember is that the Soviet nukes was cruder and larger. I don't know if that was correct for the late '90s or not. But the reason for the larger Soviet ones was that the western robots could hit a specific building, and a Soviet one could not. A Soviet one didn't have precision enough to hit a specific city block, so it needed a lot more bang to make sure the target was destroyed. That was also the reason why it was any point to build those bunkers that would survive "...unless receiving a direct hit."
__________________
If you find yourself to be in a fair fight; you are either competing in a sport, or somebody has messed up.
Reply With Quote