View Single Post
  #9  
Old 02-28-2014, 02:47 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schone23666 View Post

I would say the "idea" of having a system like DIVAD wasn't necessarily bad at all, especially if they could've tweaked it to provide ground fire support in a pinch like the Russians did with the ZSU-23-4, though I heard the Russians lost a lot of ZSU's when they pressed them into that role. But once they started designing it with inferior components in a very sloppy and poor execution of said platform....ugh, yeah, enough said.
The DIVAD was a poor excuse to use "off the shelf" components to provide something we needed at a time when defense budgets were getting slim for R&D. It was a PBI (Partially Baked Idea).
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote