View Single Post
  #12  
Old 03-19-2014, 03:29 AM
Rainbow Six's Avatar
Rainbow Six Rainbow Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Targan View Post
I've been following this story too. In my professional life I'm a supervisor at a government media monitoring unit so the news is kind of my thing. This is a really strange case. Solid information has been really slow to trickle out. There's still not really enough data to make a solid prediction. Here's my take on things:

The aircraft's transponder was probably deliberately switched off. I'm no airline pilot but I guess that can be done from the cockpit. The system that sends engineering data back to home base probably can't be switched off from the cockpit (maybe from the avionics bay below the cockpit?) and whoever had control of the aircraft either didn't know about that system, didn't know how to turn it off or didn't want to leave the cockpit to disable it.

The aircraft's movements after the transponder was switched off seem to have been deliberate. It's looking like someone initiated a radical course change and then flew the aircraft nap of earth on an entirely new heading (or as close to nap of earth as you effectively can fly a commercial passenger jet). That sort of action suggests that someone wanted to land the plane intact and undetected. Why would you bother to do all that if you were just going to crash the plane on purpose? Makes no sense.

There has been some suggestion that the engineering data updates back to home base continued past the time that the aircraft would have run out of fuel if still in flight. Logic would suggest that this means the aircraft was already on the ground somewhere and the APU was on. The APU could continue to run for hours longer than the main engines.

But then the waters get muddied even further by stories like this:
Oil rig worker says he saw Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 burst into flames

Conclusions: It either blew up in flight (terrorist attack or catastrophic malfunction, who knows?) and hasn't been found because there's a whole lot of empty ocean out there, or it was hijacked by a person/persons unknown and was landed somewhere, probably in SW Asia. If it was all done by a terrorist organisation, why no claims of responsibility? Why no intel suggesting an op was being prepared or was in play? I'm not big on conspiracy theories at all, but this case is a really strange one. I'm almost prepared to believe it was a government or corporate black op. That would explain why no-one has said anything about why it was done. Unfortunately, if that is the case, the passengers and crew may end up dead anyway, to tie up loose ends.

Please, I welcome the above thoughts being critiqued. What have I missed?

Edit: Just had a look through the links others have posted. Some really interesting theories there too.
Sky News this morning was revisiting the theory that there may have been a fire (or some other incident, but not terrorism) in the cockpit that neccessitated the shutting down of the transponder and other systems by the pilots (not as an act of sabotage but to try and save the aircraft) followed by a turn towards land to try and make an emergency landing, however for whatever reason pilots were incapacitated resulting in the plane flying on under autopilot until it ran out of fuel somewhere in the Indian Ocean. Apparently several aviation "experts" have asserted that this is one of the more plausible explanations. There are also reports that the plane heading south rather than north is supported by Australian data from the Jindalee radar network.

I know that theory contradicts some of the "facts" that have been released but there have already been several contradictions and about turns since the plane first went missing. I wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory per se, but it seems to me that some Governments may not be comfortable with sharing all the data they have either because it exposes how ineffective their systems are (in the event they couldn't / didn't trace the flight) or exposes that they have capabilities that others don't know about (for example one report states that the Jindalee radar has a greater range than its officially declared 3,000km).
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom
Reply With Quote