[Raellus]

I like it so far, Rainbow. If Iran appears to be winning what is nominally a sectarian war in Iraq (it's really more of a war for regional dominance), Israel might be prompted to act. That would cause further rifts in the various Sunni and Shiite alliances, leading to a reshuffling of sorts, and a wider, more destructive conflict. I'm going to try to tie this into events in Korea.

This is an alternative to what I've already posted as an option for the U.S.' active military involvement in [what will become WWIII] Asia:

Climate change exacerbates famine conditions in North Korea. Millions are reported starving, tens or maybe hundreds of thousands have already died. South Koreans demand that something be done. At around the same time, evidence surfaces that North Korea has shared nuclear weapons technology with Iran, enabling the Iranians to produce their own operational weapons. North Korea, its senior leadership gripped by paranoia, refuse all offers of aid, and counter with their typical belligerent proclamations.

The U.S. and South Korea, therefore, launch an invasion of the North with the fait accompli of humanitarian concerns- in reality, the main objective is regime change and destruction of the NK nuclear arsenal. As the North Korean forces are pushed back, the Dear Leader prepares to launch a last ditch nuclear attack with his few remaining weapons. Knowing that this will mean the annihilation of NK, a cabal of his own generals depose Kim in a coup and the NK military begins to collapse. Troubled by the approach of U.S./ROK forces, the Chinese cross the Yalu river in force, leading to clashes with U.S. and ROK troops. WWIII in Asia has officially begun.

Having taken a closer look at the NK military, it's pretty clear that they wouldn't have much of a chance against the ROK, much less the U.S., in an attack on the South. This scenario takes this into consideration by reversing the roles a bit, as well as tying into the war in the Middle East.

Thoughts?