Politically Influenced? You Think?
Hmmm. Let's see.
1. Facts not multiply verifiable.
2. Situation still apparently fluid, activity on-going.
3. No independent or non-partisan reporting
I didn't mean to imply that the Wiki was completely accurate; more that i was amused that Wikipedia was being used as a war diary, more or less.
Which means that it is being followed by someone with a current interest, which leads me to assume that there is some spin included; the higher level of detail seems to be form the Ukrainian government side.
Personally, I'd rather not see anything in Wikipedia until say a year from now, when somebody can take a longer look back than 12 hours ago.
I almost got the feeling that I was about to read "Esteban just told me he reached the men's room on the second floor near the West end stairs in the new terminal, and that he can fire down the corridor into the old terminal!"
Uncle Ted
|