View Single Post
  #17  
Old 06-30-2015, 05:54 PM
swaghauler swaghauler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 1,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
Big giveaway for the T-64 is the road wheels, they're much smaller than those on the T-54 & T-55 and they're evenly spaced along the hull. The T-54, T-55 have only five road wheels compared to the six on the T-64 and the first and second wheels are spaced further apart than the second through to fifth road wheels.

The T-62 on the other hand, while looking "generally" similar to the T-5x series (for example, still having five large road wheels), has evenly spaced road wheels from 1st to 3rd and then a larger space between 3rd & 4th and 4th & 5th.

The T-54 & T-55 look like an overgrown T-34 with a domed turret, no surprise as they are an evolution of the T-34 design via the T-44. Even the T-62 is a child of the T-34 as it is nothing more than an evolution of the T-55. Tank designs of that period accepted into Soviet service tended to be evolutionary developments of older designs rather than revolutionary developments until they accepted the T-64.

Going back to the Tiran, apparently Israel only had about 100 captured T-62 MBTs available for conversion to Tiran-6 standard, hence why we don't see many of them compared to the many hundreds of T-54, T-55 variants in Israeli service.
And going back to the movie, another factor that added to the confusion was the tank had a five-man crew whereas the T-5x series only had a four-man crew (driver, commander, gunner, loader).


Sheesh, once a tank-head, always a tank-head
I like military smallarms too
Thanks for the "heads-up." I was confused by the location of the fume extractor on the barrel. If the Israelis' put a 105mm cannon in that chassis; It would explain why the extractor is centered on the barrel instead of towards the muzzle like most older Soviet Tanks.
Reply With Quote