In the interest of civility and probably my better judgement I will answer your questions to the best of my ability. I was actually enjoying this debate until the tone of your comments changed. I am being polite to you and I expect you to also be polite if you reply. Criticism is fine but moderate it.
Before I answer your questions I will inform you that I am in Ireland at the moment with some of my sources. The rest of my sources are in America on my book shelf, in my attic, burned to CD or on memory key and I cannot access them until I return to America at Christmas.
I already gave you my principle source for naval statistics but you overlooked it. That is
World War II a Statistical Survey by John Ellis. It's my favourite reference book and you may have it, and if you do you will know what a good source of statistics it is. Its naval statistics are not infallible but they are good. Its land, air and industrial statistics are much better in my opinion, and its national army division listings are the most complete I have seen. Some of its references are sourced from US War Department and British MOD records.
If you want statistics for US Lend Lease supplies to the Soviet Union and the British Empire and other countries then I suggest you go online and google the following:
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/...hip/index.html
You will find a complete and thorough listing of very item that the US shipped to other countries around the world. It's listing for the Soviet Union and British Empire is very complete.
If you want statistics on German aircraft and many other points I have argued with you over there are so many now sources online that it is pointless listing books from my memory I don't have on hand. I find it a bit tedious repeatedly going back and forth over small statistics and technical issues but I can access some of my books and a lot more if you are prepared to wait a month. But as you have used internet sites to support your argument and so have I as so much information is now online what is the point.