View Single Post
  #13  
Old 01-15-2016, 11:13 AM
unkated unkated is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin View Post
You don't really need massive quantities of resources to launch a rocket - the question is what kind of rocket and what payloads is it carrying
To launch a rocket? no.

To build the rocket parts - or even assemble a rocket from spare parts from different parts across the US? I have my doubts.

To assemble a satellite in post-1997 US? To calculate a useful orbit, launch (easy) and track that it hit orbit, and get useful data downloads or communication links (as payment for the effort)? I have graver doubts.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin View Post
keep in mind that the timeline strongly suggests that the US didn't launch a bunch of their rockets that were in silos and the like -
Yes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin View Post
those rockets, at least those still operational,
would be perfect to use to get a communications or weather satellite into orbit
Not really. These are suborbital. They could probably be repurposed to get a smaller package (satellite) into a stable LEO. To launch into a useful GSO (GeoSynchronous Orbit) where the satellite would stay overhead and provide useful weather comverage over a large chunk of earth or a while? No. And therefore probably not worth the effort. LEO commo satellites are only useful in a constellation; teh lower the orbit, the more needed for coverage.

Uncle Ted
Reply With Quote