Thread: M4a1
View Single Post
  #20  
Old 04-18-2016, 11:32 AM
.45cultist .45cultist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unkated View Post
It has been my experience that Fire Fusion and Steel provides skewed results when applied to real world weapons. Either the weapons are notably heavier than their real-world design, or if held to weight and size, are underpowered.

If nothing else, the formulae used in Infantry Weapons are those used to develop the other weapons modeled in the Infantry Weapons Guide. So, whatever the difference is in the two modeling systems (FFS & Inf Weapons), using those in Inf weapons would be consistent with the rest of the weapons available.

Uncle Ted
I had the second printing that had some corrections and the results seemed to be comparable to book stuff. I used it for rcl and range of a given barrel length. Beyond figuring barrel length, I don't use the entire rules set so it's just more detailed than IW. I hope 3HG gets their weapons book done soon.

Last edited by .45cultist; 04-20-2016 at 08:01 PM.
Reply With Quote