Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
Sorry but I am following canon - the city of San Francisco is still there per the canon (read Howling Wilderness) - that means that it didnt get nuked out of existence
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Fr...Naval_Shipyard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mare_I...Naval_Shipyard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasu..._San_Francisco
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suisun_Bay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_...val_Fuel_Depot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parks_..._Training_Area
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moffett_Federal_Airfield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Air_Station_Alameda
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Air_Station_Oakland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawren...nal_Laboratory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concor...eapons_Station
That is a short list of the things in or around San Francisco worth hitting with a nuke. There is no reason for the Soviets to have left them alone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
- and Littlefield's collection was a long way from there - there are NO nuke targets anywhere near by - as in NONE - and armor welding is specialized enough that it took welders at BAE quite a while to train and pass testing needed to weld together our M88's - I know - I was the Quality Lead for the M88A2 program for 5 years at York
|
Quite a few nukes if the Soviets are in anyway competent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
As for the Centurion Mk13 - you might want to actually look up its specs - it had the same gun that was on the original M1 - meaning that all the ammo it needs is sitting with the 40th ready to go - no need to send it to Canada - all they had to do was load the ammo racks
|
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/co...4200_Centurion
Yes, it has an L7. Who knows how to operate the sights? Who is a British Master Gunner? Not anyone in the 40th... Canada, yes.
It is a BRITISH tank. Meaning, NO Manuals and NO ONE that knows how to operate it. and NO one has any of the speialized metri tools for the engine or other parts. Give it to some one that would be able to use it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
And all the tanks he restored had working radios - he even bought them straight from the military
|
You do understand that radios have to be compatible to talk to each other. By the 90s voice and data encryption is standard across all Branches. Those WW2 radios and even the 50 and 60s radio have at best encrypted single channel, the easiest kind to interept, triangulate, and jam. Let alone their short operational range or that these antiques use vacuum tubes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
Not quite sure what the issue is but Littlefield's Collection is there - as are those mechanics and a huge haul of working armored and other military vehicles - more than enough to give the 40th what it needs to kick the Mexican Army at the least clear back to the mountains north of LA
|
I only have issue with the following things really.
One anything built before say 1965 isn't worth the effort to repair it and send into battled. If any of it was realistially useful in a military, that piee would not be sitting in a museum.
The point I am trying to drive home is LOGISTICS.
No one is taking the Shermans to war as there is no ammunition. No stored, none manufactured, the 75mm and 76mm are obsolete and retired from service. No Depot is going to trot out a crate the just happens to be there. Explosives are carefully maintained as these degrade in storage. After a time, the surplus is destroyed by incineration as the components are unstable.
No 30.06.... phased out in the 1950 and even the links are a different style.
the M60s, the M47, those work because in some fashion or another those are in the Supply. Parts are made for those. Usually for Allies, but the M60 AVLB is in use at the time. They work because they use current ammunition and current radios work in them on current mounts. Most importantly they work because there is trained people to use them and keep them running at the unit level.
You don't waste time and resources on things you cannot field and support at the user level. Who ares if some guy at Portola could fix the carburetor on the wonky Sherman.... the mechanic right there is L.A. cannot.
Lastly, my most important point... You don't send soldiers out to die. You send soldiers out to win those battles, not hamstringing them with obsolete machines that will get them killed. Those WW2 tanks don't have the armor to protect those men from the weakest of anti armor weapons or methods of the 1990s.
Take it from someone that has been shot at in an unarmored M1025 and had an uparmored M1114 blown out from under him by an IED. I appreciate the difference.