Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin
FYI splitting the game from 2300AD could make things very interesting indeed
Without that tie in does either the uber drought or New America happen?
The uber drought that basically stopped the US come back and led to the loss of the Southwest to Mexico and Texas going independent has always been controversial but something like that was needed as part of the rationale of the shrunken US for 2300AD. And the creation of New America that kept Civgov and Milgov so busy fighting them that they couldnt put the country back together until 2020 - and thus lose a lot of land to a much weaker country because of that.
Course we wont know most likely at the start of the game - keep in mind that none of that was in the original releases - it took until the Caribbean module to find out about New America and Kidnapped for the drought.
But it means that in many ways the future is wide open as to what could happen if there is no longer the predetermined 2300AD timeline that must be obeyed.
|
At the very least if it means that we might see some credible attempts at creating successor states beyond the two feuding governments, then I'm all for it.