View Single Post
  #903  
Old 01-08-2023, 10:19 AM
castlebravo92 castlebravo92 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan-117 View Post
I'm with Homer - they go MILGOV.

Tara Romaneasca has a short section on the impact of the NSA's loss and MILGOV alignment on page 93, which is informative. Because when the NSA has a problem generating COMSEC KEYMAT, it's a whole of government problem that point. It's not like most Agencies are using any other COMSEC material - certainly not for national security information.

So reconstituting that capability by the NSA for MILGOV will be a priority, as will CIVGOV seeking alternative encryption systems that don't rely on NSA KEYMAT, which they can't get. Again, the new Romania sourcebook has an entry on this issue, with DOE taking up the mantel on one-time pad production, "and hand-building a limited number of radio encryption modules not based on existing DOD or NSA software architecture."
Yeah, there isn't a split until 1999 anyway, since through May 1998 there is technically a POTUS in charge of everything.
Reply With Quote