Quote:
Originally Posted by micromachine
This seems like a waste of a fair fire support platform, unless it has the main gun damaged. There are plenty of soft skin and light armoured vehicles in the Ukrainian arsenal that would suffer greatly from the D10T.
It would be far more effective if employed in groups, smoke laid to cover the advance, or there was a feint attack on the left/right or there was suppressive fire applied to the enemy position.
Seems like Russia is using ISIL's playbook and poorly at that.
|
To play devil's advocate, they might not want to use the T-54/55 very much because it requires a fourth crewman that normally isn't part of Russian tank crews and trained crews are better used on the newer tanks. Semi-trained crews can probably handle them adequately in the artillery role that the T-54/55 and T-62 are allegedly being used in, but not in the armored assault role.
IIRC, the D-10T also had a barrel life of just a few hundred rounds, so this one may have already been worn out by use as
ad hoc artillery.