View Single Post
  #14  
Old 03-10-2009, 04:35 PM
boogiedowndonovan's Avatar
boogiedowndonovan boogiedowndonovan is offline
Activist Rules Lawyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: norcal
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b
That doesn't make sense to me (though, I grant you, we are dealing with the US military). The Rangers and SF are already using the M-3 Carl Gustav recoilless rifle -- it seems like they could just order more for the 82nd and 101st and light fighters. It's already in the supply chain, and the Army already has people who are training-qualified on it. Or am I thinking too logically...?
hey Paul,

it doesn't make sense to me either. Not only are the Rangers and SF using the M-3 but also the SEALs.

I recall posting something about this back on the old board. I was doing a hypothetical TOE for t2k light infantry divisions and wanted to give them more punch and was trying to figure out if they would go with the M-3 or the SMAW. I can't remember what the conclusion was though. Hence, part of the reason I brought up this most recent thread, but I'd also like to know anyways.
Reply With Quote