IMHO, looks pretty good, Admiral. Aligning v4's strategic Sweden situation w/ v1-2.2 timelines is a neat trick and I think you've pulled it off admirably.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adm.Lee
4) all of this is during the other 1998 battles in central and eastern Germany, perhaps as a distraction. No other NATO forces are available to help the Swedes, so the 3 light/leg divisions from the East Coast are sent-- not good from the CONUS perspective, it turns out.
|
Since you asked for thoughts and suggestions, I think moving formations of corps/army size into an ostensibly neutral country requires a more compelling reason than "distraction". Invading Sweden certainly would "distract" the opposition, but it would also create more enemies.
Has Sweden abandoned its neutrality or otherwise provoked the Soviets? Perhaps one of the belligerents invades Sweden in an attempt to outflank strong defensive positions in N. Norway? But that would entail bringing a neutral nation into the war as an opponent, which seems very counterproductive. Sweden is no pushover.
-