Thread: Nuclear Blasts
View Single Post
  #16  
Old 02-24-2009, 07:55 AM
Earthpig's Avatar
Earthpig Earthpig is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Menomonie, Wisconsin
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalos72
I was just reading though "Armies of the Night" and realized something.

The strike hitting Linden was listed at 1.25MT. So damage radius should be MUCH smaller then what the maps included show.

I am using this as a guide... http://sc-ems.com/ems/blastICT/blastICT.htm

Is this example accurate?

Obviously radiation and subsequent fires and such would cause more damage. But the maps in the module show complete destruction for 10-12miles out.

What were your calculations on range from Ground zero? I was under the impression that for every factor of ten increase in tonnage the radius only increased by two in which case the difference in radius between a 1 kt vs a 1mt weapon is from 3.8 to 30.4(origianally posted as 15.2) miles NOT 3.8 to 38 miles(I read this a long time ago and suffer from CRS(can't remember Sh....what was I saying?)) ooops missed a doubleing...... carry on. nothing to see here..... the result is close to yours. did good....... sorry bowing out ....of course the difference between a 100mt weapon, my way versus your way gives a 20 mile closer safe area.
__________________
"It's in russian it say's "front towards enem......."

Last edited by Earthpig; 02-24-2009 at 08:06 AM.
Reply With Quote