|
|
|
#27
12-01-2009, 05:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Take a look at tank development in WWII and get back to me....
I'm certain they would have pushed on with alternate designs, including the Challenger II. They already had the hulls in plenty, it seems that only the weapon and electronics were an issue. The Challenger also fits the British concept of combat in Eruope a lot better than any other tank. Heavily armed and armoured, it might not be the fastest on the battlefield, but it can take the punishment others can't.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem 
|
| Tags |
| weapons |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode