RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2011, 08:06 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,749
Default 5th generation jet fighters

The Sukhoi T-50, is it a true 5th gen 'stealth' fighter? Could it go toe-to-toe with the F-22 Raptor?
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2011, 12:44 AM
Mohoender's Avatar
Mohoender Mohoender is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Near Cannes, South of France
Posts: 1,653
Default

My answer would be yes. Still I'm not convinced it can fully challenge the F22 Raptor which might remain the best fighter of that generation. The future F35 Lightning (also a 5th generation fighter) might still be inferior to the F22.

Mig29 hardly compare with F15 while being of the same generation.

Moreover, according to the US DoD, it seems that they are more concerned about the Chengdu J20.

I don't know if that site is fully reliable but it gives some interesting insights:
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-081109-1.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2011, 08:18 AM
95th Rifleman 95th Rifleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Default

With the current economic mess the Americans could find themselves dropping behind. Take the "new" technology for the F22 that allows a pilot to aim a missle wherver he looks, the Russians have had this technology for a while now and use it in their MIG 29's.

I have to disagree with Mohoender, the export MIG 29's are no comparison to the F15 but the Russian model (along with the SU 37's) can compete with the F15.
__________________
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2011, 08:42 AM
ShadoWarrior's Avatar
ShadoWarrior ShadoWarrior is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
With the current economic mess the Americans could find themselves dropping behind. Take the "new" technology for the F22 that allows a pilot to aim a missile wherever he looks, the Russians have had this technology for a while now and use it in their MIG 29's.
Which is a further development of older technology from the AH-64 Apache.
__________________
If you find yourself in a fair fight you didn't plan your mission properly!

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2011, 06:12 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Just as an aside, the site that Mohoender has linked to is essentially a series of articles by military science analysts and researchers.
Both the men who founded the site have careers relating to or directly involved with the defence forces.

Dr Carlo Kopp is a qualified pilot and has written for many defence publications including Jane's Missiles and Rockets and Air International. http://www.ausairpower.net/editor.html
Mr Peter Goon is a qualified pilot and has served in the RAAF and graduated from the USN's Test Pilot School. http://www.ausairpower.net/CV-PAG-2007.html

Is it reliable? Yes but it must be pointed out that these two men have a particular aim and that is to promote a better air power capacity for Australia and their collection of articles is meant to support that idea.

http://www.ausairpower.net/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2011, 07:27 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,289
Default

The Su-50 airframe might end up being as stealthy as the F22 (although I doubt that it will be) and, if the MiG-29 and SU-27 series are any indication of a trend in this direction, it will probably be more manouverable. But the Russians are still a bit behind the west in terms of avionics. So, I'll have to give the edge to the Raptor.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2011, 07:55 PM
Panther Al's Avatar
Panther Al Panther Al is offline
Sabre Ready!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DC Area
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to Panther Al
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
With the current economic mess the Americans could find themselves dropping behind. Take the "new" technology for the F22 that allows a pilot to aim a missle wherver he looks, the Russians have had this technology for a while now and use it in their MIG 29's.

I have to disagree with Mohoender, the export MIG 29's are no comparison to the F15 but the Russian model (along with the SU 37's) can compete with the F15.
For what its worth: The MiG29 was never meant to square up against the F15- it was designed more as a counter to the F16. The SU27 on the other hand, thats aimed right at the F15.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2011, 08:42 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

When you consider that over the last fifty years or so, many of the worlds conflicts haven't really involved East vs West technology (Iraq being one exception to the general rule), and with many of the worlds more unstable and warlike nations/regions fielding essentially the same equipment as each other....

It seems unreasonable to assume Russian built planes will need to go up against Western airframes. A more reasonable approach may be to compare the sale price - a $2 million plane is much more likely to see combat against a similar value, unless the poorer force does something REALLY STUPID and pisses off a wealthier country (or one with a higher amount of it's GDP spent on the military).

Even if similar technology is pitted against each other, the quality of the pilot will have a LOT to do with the outcome. A novice in the seat of the most advanced machine conceived by man is almost guaranteed to loose against a highly trained pilot in a machine 30 years old.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-19-2011, 09:35 AM
RN7 RN7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
When you consider that over the last fifty years or so, many of the worlds conflicts haven't really involved East vs West technology (Iraq being one exception to the general rule), and with many of the worlds more unstable and warlike nations/regions fielding essentially the same equipment as each other....

It seems unreasonable to assume Russian built planes will need to go up against Western airframes. A more reasonable approach may be to compare the sale price - a $2 million plane is much more likely to see combat against a similar value, unless the poorer force does something REALLY STUPID and pisses off a wealthier country (or one with a higher amount of it's GDP spent on the military).

Even if similar technology is pitted against each other, the quality of the pilot will have a LOT to do with the outcome. A novice in the seat of the most advanced machine conceived by man is almost guaranteed to loose against a highly trained pilot in a machine 30 years old.
Vietnam War
Six Day War
Indo-Pakistani War
Yom Kippur War
Iran-Iraq War
Bekaa Valley

All proxy wars perphaps regarding US/Western vs Soviet technology, but still a lot of combat between East and Western technology.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-19-2011, 03:28 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Even if similar technology is pitted against each other, the quality of the pilot will have a LOT to do with the outcome. A novice in the seat of the most advanced machine conceived by man is almost guaranteed to loose against a highly trained pilot in a machine 30 years old.
I agree -- the Russians are coming up with some great machines, but I heard somewhere that Russian pilots get as little as 12 flying hours per YEAR -- even an Air National Guard pilot in the US gets about that in 1-2 weeks.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.