RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2012, 08:21 AM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default Body Armor

Another question - this one actually not about tanks!

Body Armor degrades when it absorbs multiple hits. Kevlar will, over time, simply wear out. While Kevlar probably isn't easy to replace (read: nigh impossible) how feasible is the manufacture of new trauma plates in a post 2k environment? I mean, they're "just" ceramic, plastic and steel sandwich laminate...but that's not exactly like milking a cow.
__________________
THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2012, 08:27 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

The ceramic would go the way of Kevlar, it requires specialized materials and factories to make. You would be more likely to see metal plates added, the first flak jackets were made of nylon and held overlapping steel strips in pockets on the armor, needless to say, they were very heavy!
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2012, 08:35 AM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragoon500ly View Post
The ceramic would go the way of Kevlar, it requires specialized materials and factories to make. You would be more likely to see metal plates added, the first flak jackets were made of nylon and held overlapping steel strips in pockets on the armor, needless to say, they were very heavy!
Yeah, I can see vehicle armor from completely destroyed (lighter) vehicles making its way to small machine shops for conversion to trauma plates.
__________________
THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2012, 08:58 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

LOL, I'm afraid that if you are planning to use vehicle armor, its more along the lines of a fabrication plant and a decent forge. Even thin armor would run at least 0.5-inch thick, thats a lot of machining!

The metal that was used in the bomber crew flak jackets and later in the first issue armored vests is actually quite thin, its initial purpose was not to stop a bullet but rather to deflect and absorb the energy of fragments. You really didn't start getting good "bullet-stopping" armor until the use of Kevlar and later, ceramics.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:06 AM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragoon500ly View Post
LOL, I'm afraid that if you are planning to use vehicle armor, its more along the lines of a fabrication plant and a decent forge. Even thin armor would run at least 0.5-inch thick, thats a lot of machining!
"But sir, I don't wanna wear the vest!"

"You'll wear it and like it - that stuff will stop a tank round."

"That's because it's made from tank armor, sir!"

Quote:
The metal that was used in the bomber crew flak jackets and later in the first issue armored vests is actually quite thin, its initial purpose was not to stop a bullet but rather to deflect and absorb the energy of fragments. You really didn't start getting good "bullet-stopping" armor until the use of Kevlar and later, ceramics.
Huh; didn't know that.
__________________
THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:36 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

It's the same with many of the lighter vehicles - their armour is only designed to protect against (ie slow down) small arms fire and shrapnel. As long as the crew and passengers survive relatively intact, it can be considered "effective".
Naturally this isn't anything close to acceptable with heavier, higher value vehicles such as MBTs, but for scout vehicles and some APCs (aka battle taxis)...
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem

Last edited by Legbreaker; 11-09-2012 at 09:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:39 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,749
Default

There was a discussion on a thread not all that long ago (late last year maybe?) in which I recall suggesting that perhaps sections of kevlar spall liner, cut to size, could be used to repair damaged/degraded kevlar body armour. I'd go looking for the thread but it's late here and likely to take bloody ages.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.