|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-27-2015, 10:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The .270 Winchester and .243 Winchester
I mentioned in passing in another thread, but should these two be treated as magnums, at least for range, if not more. Call for more experience!
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com 
|
|
#2
03-27-2015, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno Paul maybe have a look at this guys site to decide...
http://www.chuckhawks.com/myth_busting_calibers.htm
|
|
#3
03-28-2015, 04:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems to indicate magnum for range, but not damage or penetration. They shoot flat, but their power levels are not unusually high.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
|
|
#4
04-05-2015, 01:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
243 is on par with the .223
270 is just a necked down 30-06
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
